In:The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 245–270
Markedness and syncretism in Kashmiri differential argument encoding
Published online: 25 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.11man
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.11man
The pronominal clitic system in Kashmiri takes the form of set of verbal suffixes conditioned by the case of the coreferent DP. This system interacts in unexpected ways with differential argument encoding (DAE) in Kashmiri, in which the case-marking of objects in non-perfective aspects is dependent on a person hierarchy. I will follow in spirit Aissen’s (2003) approach to DAE as adapted to Kashmiri in Sharma (2001), however I will argue that the particulars of the Kashmiri clitic system force us to adopt an account couched not in the syntax, but in the post-syntactic component of the grammar. Keine and Müller (2008) propose that DAE is a phenomenon of the morphology-syntax interface, employing harmonic alignment of scales within framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993, 1994). I argue here that an otherwise mysterious set of clitic syncretisms in Kashmiri, including the overlap in the marking of ergative subjects and accusative objects, find explanation if we consider Kashmiri DAE not as an instance of differential marking in the narrow syntax, but instead as a as a non-zero/non-zero alternation resulting from the interaction of morphological processes and a system of optimization at the morphology-syntax interface.
References (24)
Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
17: 673–711.
. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. Economy.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
21: 435–483.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1967. Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In
To Honor Roman Jakobson
(ed.), vol. 1, 239–270, The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
Calabrese, Andrea. 2008. On the shyness of the first person: Investigations on markedeness and under specification in morphology.
MUMSA Conference
, Harvard University, March 1–3, 2008.
Hale, Ken. 1972. A new perspective on American Indian linguistics. In:
New Perspectives on the Pueblos
, Alfonso Ortiz (ed.), 87–103. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In
The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger
, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In
Papers on Phonology and Morphology
, Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. 21, 275–288.
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In
Papers at the Interface
, Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.
Hook, Peter Edwin & Koul, Omkar N. 1984. Pronominal suffixes and split ergativity in Kashmiri. In
Aspects of Kashmiri Linguistics
, Omkar N. Koul & Peter Edwin Hook (eds), 123–135. Delhi: Bahri.
Hook, Peter. 1987. Poguli syntax in the light of Kashmiri: A preliminary report.
In Studies in the Linguistic Sciences
17(1): 63–71.
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus.
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague
6: 240–288, reprinted 1966 In Readings in Linguistics II, Eric Hamp, Fred Householder & Robert Austerlitz (eds), 51–89, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keine, Stefan. 2007. Reanalysing Hindi split ergativity as a morphological phenomenon. In
1 2 Many
, Jochen Trommer & Andreas Opitz (eds), Universität Leipzig, Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 85, 1–2.
Keine, Stefan & Müller, Gereon. 2008. Differential argument encoding by impoverishment. In
Scales
, M. Richards & A. Malchukov (eds), 83–136. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Manetta, Emily. 2006. Peripheries in Kashmiri and Hindi-Urdu. PhD dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz.
. 2011. Peripheries in Hindi-Urdu and Kashmiri. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sharma, Devyani. 2001. Kashmiri case clitics and person hierarchy effects. In
Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimal Theoretic Syntax
, Peter Sells (ed.), 225–256. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In:
Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages
, R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Subbarao, Kārumūri V. 2001. Agreement in south Asian languages and minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
The Yearbook of South Asian Languages
, P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (eds), 457–492. London/New Delhi: Sage Publications/Thousand Oaks.