Cover not available

In:The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 1–24

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The lexicon-syntax interface

Some issues

 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Central Institute of Indian Languages
 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Central Institute of Indian Languages
Published online: 25 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.01int
References (73)
Abraham, Werner & Leisiö, Larisa (eds). 2006. Passivization and Typology. Form and Function [Typological Studies in Languages 68]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amritavalli, Raghavachari. 2003. Syntactic categories and lexical argument structure. Language in India 3(5 May).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Emond. 1982. Purpose clauses and control. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation , P. Jacobson & G. K. Pullum (eds), 35–57. Reidel: Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. C. 1996. On the structural position of themes and goals. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon , J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), 7–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives . [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 102]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C., Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2003. Topics in the syntax of the modern indo-aryan languages. Causativization. [URL]
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David. 2003. Causative derivations in Hindi. [URL] (2003)
Bodding, Paul O. 1929/1952. A Santal Grammar for the Beginners . Benagaria: Santal Mission of the Northern Churches.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense II: The Normal Course of Events . Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N. 1984. Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation. Linguistics 22(3): 259–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deeney, John. J. 1975. Ho Grammar and Vocabulary . Chaibasa: Xavier Ho Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini & Sharma, Devyani. 2007. Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan Languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3): 369–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna M. & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1991. Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 369–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building, 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building, 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], A. Carnie, H. Harley & T. Bures (eds), 275–288. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Sase bizarre: The structure of Japanese causatives. In Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Society Meeting , P. Koskinen (ed.), 221–232. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Compounding in distributive morphology. In Oxford Handbook of Compounding . Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds), 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. A minimalist approach to argument structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 427–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1999. Accomplishments. In Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, the Second GLOW Meeting in Asia , Mamoru Saito et al.. (eds), 131–139. Nagoya, Japan: Nanzan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Johann. 1903. Mundari Grammar . Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. A. 1986. Passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1980. Aspects of Hindi-grammar . New Delhi: Manohar Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Subject and topic , C. N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon , Johann Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Kluwer Dordrecht: Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. A. & Dowty, David. R. 1988. Towards a nongrammatical account of thematic role. Syntax and Semantics 21: 61–73. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop. 1994. Active passives. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , R. Aronovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss & M. Senturia (eds). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2], A. Dimitriadis et al.. (eds), 201–225.
Martin, Roger & Uriagereka, Juan. 2000. Some possible foundations of the minimalist program. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, R. S. 1972. Outline of Hindi Grammar . Oxford: Clarendon Press, Gloucestershire Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara. 1994. Argument Structure in Hindi . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neukom, Lukas. 2001. Santali . München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1984. Control and the thematic domain. Language 60: 215–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 2007. Languages without nouns and verbs? An alternative to lexical classes in Kharia. In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics , Colin P. Masica (ed.), 274–303. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietroski. Paul. 2011. Minimal semantic instructions. In The Oxford Handbook on Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 472–498. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Introducing Arguments . Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Minimalist semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 449–471. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. UiL-OTS Working Papers . Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The theta system – An overview. In Theoretical Linguistics 28, W. Sternfeld (ed.), 229–290. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal. 2003. Thematic arity operations and parametric variations. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics . University of Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric J., Bhattacharya, Tanmoy & Spathas, Giorgos. 2007. Argument Structure . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richa. 2011. Hindi Verb Classes and their Argument Structure Alternations . Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richa & Nandaraj, Amom. 2011. The Status of Causee in Manipuri and Hindi . Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1987. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects . Foris: Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Smuggling, Affectness and Argument Structure Alternation . University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahoo, Anindita. 2011. Oriya passives with ditransitives. In Papers from Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching 2010 , K. Kaufhold, S. McCulloch & A. Tominc (eds), 173–200. UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. in progress. Passives in Some South Asian languages: A Comparative Study. PhD Dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1982. The Syntax of Words [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 7]. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Srivastava, Vishwajit N. 1969. A Structural Study of Hindi Phrases. PhD Dissertation, Agra University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1994. Event phrase structure and a theory of functional categories. In Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of Canadian Linguistics Society , P. Koskinen (ed.), 559–570.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions of “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Liinguistic Inquriy 12.2: 245–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1989. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue