(Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface

Frascarelli, Mara; Ramaglia, Francesca

doi:10.1075/la.208.04fra

In:Cleft Structures
Edited by Katharina Hartmann and Tonjes Veenstra
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 208] 2013
► pp. 97–138

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

(Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface

Mara Frascarelli | Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Francesca Ramaglia | Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Published online: 28 November 2013

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.208.04fra

This paper proposes an interface approach to (pseudo)cleft constructions, in which their semantic, syntactic, discourse and intonational properties are examined in a cross-linguistic perspective. Following most influential studies, the relevant constructions are analyzed as specificational copular sentences, in which the two major constituents – a (free) relative DP and the (to be) focused phrase – are merged in a SC structure. However, based on formal evidence and discourse considerations, we take the clefted constituent to be merged as the predicate of the relevant construction, thus departing from the general view. Finally, (pseudo)clefts are also shown to imply a Topic strategy. This proposal is substantiated by intonational investigation, showing a crucial correlation between tonal events and the information-structural articulation activated by clefting. Keywords: Focus; interface; (pseudo)clefts; specificational copular sentences; (different types of) Topic(s)

Cited by (31)

Cited by 31 other publications

Order by:

Hert, Regina, Anja Arnhold & Juhani Järvikivi

2025. Focus effect unveils children’s local processing of pronouns and reflexives. Language Acquisition 32:3 ► pp. 363 ff.

Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob

2022. When data challenges theory. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 1 ff.

Van Valin, Robert D.

2021. An unusual cleft construction in Lakhota (Siouan, North America). Faits de Langues 52:1 ► pp. 255 ff.

Hopp, Holger, Joseph Bail & Carrie N. Jackson

2020. Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English. Second Language Research 36:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Pinelli, Maria Cristina, Cecilia Poletto & Cinzia Avesani

2020. Does prosody meet syntax? A case study on standard Italian cleft sentences and left peripheral focus. The Linguistic Review 37:2 ► pp. 309 ff.

Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Karen De Clercq

2019. From negative cleft to external negator. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 228 ff.

Batllori, Montserrat, Elisabeth Gibert-Sotelo & Isabel Pujol

2019. Changes in the argument and event structure of psych verbs in the history of Spanish. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 249 ff.

Bernstein, Judy, Francisco Ordóñez & Francesc Roca

2019. On the emergence of personal articles in the history of Catalan. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 88 ff.

Blümel, Andreas & Marco Coniglio

2019. What kind of constructions yield what kind of constructions?. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 131 ff.

Miriam Bouzouita, Anne Breitbarth, Lieven Danckaert & Elisabeth Witzenhausen

2019. Cycles in Language Change,

Breitbarth, Anne, Lieven Danckaert, Elisabeth Witzenhausen & Miriam Bouzouita

2019. Cycling through diachrony. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 1 ff.

De Clercq, Karen

2019. French negation, the Superset Principle, and Feature Conservation. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 199 ff.

Fischer, Susann, Mario Navarro & Jorge Vega Vilanova

2019. The clitic doubling parameter. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 52 ff.

Fuß, Eric

2019. When morphological and syntactic change are not in sync. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 33 ff.

Garzonio, Jacopo & Silvia Rossi

2019. Weak elements in cycles. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 71 ff.

Kinn, Kari

2019. Bare singular nouns in Middle Norwegian. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 109 ff.

Moreno, Mitrović

2019. Quantificational cycles and shifts. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 155 ff.

Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici

2019. On the relative cycle. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 177 ff.

van Gelderen, Elly

2019. Cyclical change and problems of projection. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 13 ff.

Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic

2018. Non-prototypical clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 1 ff.

Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli

2017. Complementizer Deletion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.

Cruschina, Silvio

2015. Some notes on clefting and fronting. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 181 ff.

Cruschina, Silvio

2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 53 ff.

Lahousse, Karen

2015. A case of focal adverb preposing in French. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 209 ff.

Frascarelli, Mara & Francesca Ramaglia

2014. The interpretation of clefting (a)symmetries between Italian and German. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 6], ► pp. 65 ff.

Haegeman, Liliane, André Meinunger & Aleksandra Vercauteren

2014. Against the matrix left peripheral analysis of English it-clefts. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 6], ► pp. 91 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. List of abbreviations. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. ix ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Copyright Page. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. iv ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Series preface. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. vii ff.

[no author supplied]

2020. Right Peripheral Fragments [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 258],

[no author supplied]

2022. Arabic Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 271],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.