In:Cleft Structures
Edited by Katharina Hartmann and Tonjes Veenstra
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 208] 2013
► pp. 35–70
Predication and specification in the syntax of cleft sentences
Published online: 28 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.208.02dik
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.208.02dik
This paper reviews the differences between predicational and specificational copular sentences in the realm of (pseudo-)cleft constructions, and proposes an analysis which treats the it of specificational it-clefts as a pro-predicate that inverts with its subject in the course of the syntactic derivation. In contrastive-focus it-clefts, the sentence-final relative clause is a right-dislocated headless relative dependent on a formal licensing relationship with the operator inside the relative clause and a content-licensing relationship with the focus. This dual licensing dependency explains the restrictions on the distribution of which as the relative clause operator in contrastive-focus it-clefts. Continuous-topic it-clefts are structurally assimilated to pseudorelative constructions, which accounts for the restrictions on the realisation of the left periphery of their relative clause. Keywords: it-cleft; predication; specification; headless relative; asyndetic specification
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Jin, Dawei & Jun Chen
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna
Jin, Dawei
Pinelli, Maria Cristina, Cecilia Poletto & Cinzia Avesani
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
KARSSENBERG, LENA
Hartmann, Jutta M.
Hartmann, Jutta M.
2018. A focus analysis of apparent predicational clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
