In:In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque
Edited by Terje Lohndal
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 202] 2013
► pp. 327–358
Language as technology
Some questions that evolutionary linguistics should address
Published online: 17 January 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.202.22muf
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.202.22muf
Over the past two decades, studies of the phylogenetic emergence of language have typically focused on grammatical characteristics, especially those that distinguish modern languages from animal communication. The relevant literature has thus left the reader with the impression that language is either exclusively or primarily mental; in the latter case, its physical features, phonetic or manual, would be epiphenomena that may be overlooked. I argue that language is natural collective technology that evolved primarily to facilitate efficient communication in populations whose social structures were becoming increasingly more complex. It emerged through hominines’ exaptation of their own anatomy, thanks to the same mind that was enabling the complex cultures they were producing. Linguistic constraints of various kinds are emergent properties that are largely consequences of the modalities used, a position that does not expect signed languages cum legitimate linguistic systems to replicate the general architecture of spoken languages in all respects. The rest of the paper speculates on how the architecture of spoken languages evolved, gradually, with some features presupposing the prior emergence of others, whereas some others conjure up concurrent emergence. The facts suggest a complex non-unilinear evolutionary trajectory with many alternative options, consistent with emergent technologies in which considerations of optimality are absent.
Cited by (29)
Cited by 29 other publications
Hassan, Yousif
Kimura, Takeshi
Ding, Seong Lin & Wei Han Chee
Auer, Anita
Bousquette, Joshua
Bousquette, Joshua, Joshua R. Brown, Benjamin Frey, Mirva Johnson, David Natvig & Joseph Salmons
Brown, Joshua R.
Brown, Joshua R. & Joseph Salmons
Frey, Benjamin E.
Johnson, Mirva
Natvig, David
Schlaudt, Oliver
Pirhonen, Antti & Rebekah Rousi
Pirhonen, Antti & Rebekah Rousi
de Boer, Bart
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Christophe Coupé & François Pellegrino
Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Cécile B. Vigouroux
Elias, John Z. & Shaun Gallagher
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2014. Language ecology, language evolution, and the actuation question. In The Sociolinguistics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 154], ► pp. 13 ff.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2015. Creoles and pidgins don’t have inadequate lexica. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30:1 ► pp. 142 ff.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2016. A cost-and-benefit approach to language loss. In Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 42], ► pp. 115 ff.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
