In:What is a Context?: Linguistic approaches and challenges
Edited by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 196] 2012
► pp. 81–104
Context
Gricean intentions vs. two-dimensional semantics
Published online: 23 October 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.196.07jas
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.196.07jas
The article analyses the concepts of context used in two-dimensional formal semantic accounts of Kaplan and Stalnaker and in selected versions of post-Gricean contextualism. It focuses on the question of contextual parameters employed in “context as index” on the one hand, and on free, top-down contextual enrichment on the other, pointing out the strengths and weaknesses of breaking down contextual dependence into specific sub-types. It also addresses the question of metaphysical vis-à-vis epistemological construal of context and points out that the epistemic context, associated with the concepts of intentions and pragmatic universals of rational conversational behaviour, may ultimately be reducible to a metaphysical construct. The claim is then assessed in terms of the contextualist theory of Default Semantics (DS) and it is concluded that metaphysical context is suitable for modeling the speaker-addressee interaction as it is conceived of in DS.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
