In:Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons
Edited by Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman and Rachel Nye
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190] 2012
► pp. 297–318
The status of complementizers in the left periphery
Published online: 27 June 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.13man
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.13man
In Section 1 we argue that the nominal nature of complementizers in many languages (notably wh-items in Romance) points to the conclusion that this extra embedding layer is nominal (cf. Rosenbaum 1967). In Section 2 we address the question whether the structures they create are more similar to headed relatives (Arsenijević 2009; Kayne 2010, to appear) or to free relatives (Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2005, 2011). In Section 3 we consider some of the empirical reasons that would recommend distinguishing between complementizers and wh-items, including selection, islands and order in the left periphery. We also consider finiteness restrictions (Section 4). In Section 5 we conclude by indicating what this line of research implies for Main Clause Phenomena.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Rugna, Giuseppe
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia
2018. Finite and non-finite complementation, particles and control in Aromanian, compared to other Romance varieties and Albanian. Linguistic Variation 18:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
