In:Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages
Edited by Sascha Gaglia and Marc-Olivier Hinzelin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 186] 2012
► pp. 201–230
Partial or complete lack of plural agreement
The role of morphology
Published online: 24 July 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.186.08pom
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.186.08pom
Many Romance languages and varieties show different patterns of partial or complete lack of plural agreement within the determiner phrase (DP). This phenomenon has scarcely been addressed in the literature and poses problems for any kind of analysis proposed so far, regardless of the theoretical background. This paper presents and classifies several cases of lack of plural agreement or plural marking within the Romance DP and critically discusses several proposed analyses in research literature and their applicability to these Romance varieties. The main focus of the discussion is placed on the role which morphology is assumed to play. It is argued that lack of plural agreement can be explained neither in pure syntactic terms nor in pure morphological terms.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Stark, Elisabeth & Jan Pavel Davatz
Cyrino, Sonia & M.Teresa Espinal
2020. Number as an adjunct in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 16], ► pp. 77 ff.
Cyrino, Sonia & M.Teresa Espinal
Pomino, Natascha & Elisabeth Stark
Massot, Benjamin & Elisabeth Stark
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
