In:Transitivity: Form, Meaning, Acquisition, and Processing
Edited by Patrick Brandt and Marco García García
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 166] 2010
► pp. 209–234
Event-structure and individuation in impersonal passives
Published online: 17 November 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.166.09pri
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.166.09pri
This paper discusses the event-structural effects of suppressing the subject argument in impersonal passives in several languages, including German, Dutch and Turkish. Corpus data partially support earlier assumptions that the situation denoted by impersonal passives is a homogenoeus, e.g. atelic, event. Contrary to some of the earlier proposals, telic (or unaccusative) verb lexemes can be used in the impersonal passive if they are forced into event-structural homogeneity. I will attempt to derive this event-structural restriction from the referential demotion of the subject argument. In this view, the telicity restriction is not a strict independent constraint but rather an epiphenomenon of the referential non-individuation of the argument undergoing a change of state.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Rovai, Francesco
2019. Impersonal passives and the suffix -r in the Indo-European languages. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 187 ff.
Ackema, Peter & Antonella Sorace
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
