In:Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure
Edited by Carsten Breul and Edward Göbbel
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 165] 2010
► pp. 231–276
Formal and functional constraints on constituent order and their universality
Published online: 9 September 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.165.09ohl
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.165.09ohl
This paper addresses the competition between syntactic relations and the structural encoding of discourse semantic functions, and, more specifically, the question of how much the distributional restriction of syntactic linearisation can be constrained by the inventory of functional features of Generative Syntax. The variation between typologically distinct languages is explained by the potential of a generative syntactic system to fix constituent order by means of functional phrases, something not implemented to the same degree in all languages. Moreover, the various information structural properties a sentence topic can have imply that notions like topic and comment are not primitives as such, but that it is more primitive features of perspectivation which determine the choice of constituents to act as sentence topics.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
J. Kerr, Elisabeth, Allen Asiimwe, Patrick Kanampiu, Zhen Li, Ernest Nshemezimana & Jenneke van der Wal
Weber, Thilo
Wolfe, Sam
2016. A comparative perspective on the evolution of Romance clausal structure. Diachronica 33:4 ► pp. 461 ff.
Wolfe, Sam
Faarlund, Jan Terje & Kristin Hagemann
2014. Subjects and objects in Germanic and Romance. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 213], ► pp. 295 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
