In:Studies in West Frisian Grammar
Selected papers by Germen J. de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 161] 2010
► pp. 233–250
Chapter 11. Grammatical borrowing and language change
The dutchification of Frisian
Published online: 18 August 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.161.11gra
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.161.11gra
In this paper we would like to address the very old problem of grammatical borrowing. We will discuss this problem within the context of minority language studies. Is it possible that the grammatical system of a minority language changes by borrowing grammatical elements and/or grammatical principles from the dominant language? It seems to be natural to take the dutchification of Frisian as an example. Three cases of grammatical borrowing of Frisian from Dutch that have been proposed in the literature will be critically discussed:
1. the borrowing of verbal endings that is supposed to be responsible for transition of verbs from the -je class to the -e class;
2. the transition of the diminutive suffix -ke to -tsje;
3. changes in the word order of the Frisian verbal complex.
We will argue that the grammatical system of Frisian does not dutchify. Furthermore this examination gives rise to some general conclusions concerning the ways in which minority languages can and cannot be influenced by dominant languages.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bergstra, Myrthe
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
