In:The Linguistics Enterprise: From knowledge of language to knowledge in linguistics
Edited by Martin B.H. Everaert, Tom Lentz, Hannah N.M. De Mulder, Øystein Nilsen and Arjen Zondervan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 150] 2010
► pp. 183–212
Theoretical validity and psychological reality of the grammatical code
Published online: 13 January 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.150.08nee
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.150.08nee
One interpretation of the competence-performance distinction is that the grammar is a knowledge base consulted by the performance systems. We argue for an alternative interpretation, according to which the grammar and the performance systems are theories of the same object, but at different levels of description. This does not mean that the grammar is reduced to the performance systems. It is fundamental in explaining properties of these systems, as it expresses constraints on their design that generalize across specific computational procedures. We base our argument on considerations of computational effi ciency, a comparison with other information-processing systems and evolutionary considerations.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Myers, James
Coopmans, Cas W. & Emiliano Zaccarella
Fodor, Janet Dean
Höhn, Georg F. K.
Iijima, Kazuki & Koji Ota
Slioussar, Natalia
2014. What is and what is not problematic about the T-model. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11], ► pp. 350 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
