In:Determiners: Universals and variation
Edited by Jila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul and Martina Wiltschko
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 147] 2009
► pp. 67–96
The proper D connection
Published online: 28 October 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.147.02gho
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.147.02gho
We examine the concepts “proper” and “common” to determine how they are encoded in noun phrases. We address the issue of the noun-determiner relation in fixing the value of a noun phrase, arguing that both noun class and determiner features are involved. We suggest that in both definite common and proper noun phrases, NP is topped with a DP. In the former case, the DP contains the overt definite determiner the (in English), which is unmarked for any proper value as well as for number. In the latter, the DP also contains a definite determiner, which is null in English but not in all languages. This determiner has the features [proper] and [singular], which restrict it to appearing with singular NPs with a [name] feature.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Höhn, Georg F.K. & Alain N. Hien
Dékány, Éva
Ghomeshi, Jila & Diane Massam
Motschenbacher, Heiko
ALEXIADOU, ARTEMIS
Alexiadou, Artemis
Palmer, Bill
Gray, Aidan
Klassen, Gabrielle & John W. Schwieter
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
