Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics

Ramchand, Gillian; Svenonius, Peter

doi:10.1075/la.132.08ram

In:The Limits of Syntactic Variation
Edited by Theresa Biberauer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132] 2008
► pp. 219–245

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics

Gillian Ramchand | CASTL, University of Tromsø

Peter Svenonius | CASTL, University of Tromsø

Published online: 17 September 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.08ram

In this paper, we argue that languages differ in what parts of meaning are

specified in the syntax and what parts are negotiated by the Conceptual-

Intentional systems (C-I). This leads to a kind of parametric variation, which

we illustrate with examples from Norwegian definiteness, Russian perfectivity,

Salish tense, and other natural language phenomena. Our claim is that syntactic

variation is not as great as sometimes suggested (for example, we argue that

Chinese has a D head and Salish has a T head), but nor are syntactico-semantic

representations identical across languages; LFs vary from one language to the

next, and in some cases C-I specifies what syntax/semantics does not, particularly

when it comes to reference tracking for the variables introduced by the syntax.

The result is a very clean system with no semantic module disinct from syntax

and hence no distinction between syntactic and semantic parameters.

Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Order by:

Nadova, Zuzana & María del Pilar García Mayo

2024. Telicity judgments in L2 English by L1 Slovak speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:6 ► pp. 775 ff.

Abumelha, Mary

2018. Classroom input to accelerate feature reassembly of English generics. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 2:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall

2017. The rise of contrastive modality in English. Linguistic Variation 17:1 ► pp. 68 ff.

Francez, Itamar & Andrew Koontz-Garboden

2017. Semantics and Morphosyntactic Variation,

Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia

2017. Enclisis/Proclisis Alternations in Romance: Allomorphies and (Re)Ordering. Transactions of the Philological Society 115:1 ► pp. 98 ff.

Bidese, Ermenegildo, Federica Cognola & Manuela Caterina Moroni

2016. Introduction. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 1 ff.

Eguren, Luis, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea

2016. Introduction. In Rethinking Parameters, ► pp. 1 ff.

Iverson, Michael & Jason Rothman

2015. Object Drop in L2 Spanish, (Complex) Feature Reassembly and L1 Pre-emption. In The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 257 ff.

Cho, Jacee & Roumyana Slabakova

2014. Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research 30:2 ► pp. 159 ff.

Winward, John

2014. The state of the article. Linguistic Variation 14:1 ► pp. 46 ff.

Lardiere, Donna

2009. Further thoughts on parameters and features in second language acquisition: a reply to peer comments on Lardiere's `Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition' in SLR 25(2). Second Language Research 25:3 ► pp. 409 ff.

Slabakova, Roumyana

2009. Features or parameters: which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study?. Second Language Research 25:2 ► pp. 313 ff.

Slabakova, Roumyana

2019. The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated. In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63], ► pp. 319 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 218],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.