Why are they different? An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs

Botwinik-Rotem, Irena

doi:10.1075/la.120.17bot

In:Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P
Edited by Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke and Rick Nouwen
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120] 2008
► pp. 331–364

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Why are they different? An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs

Irena Botwinik-Rotem

Published online: 21 May 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.120.17bot

Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Order by:

Burukina, Irina

2023. On the syntax of postpositional phrasesin Mari. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 158 ff.

Cinque, Guglielmo

2022. On Two Sub-projections of the Nominal Extended Projection: Some Romance Evidence. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

Real-Puigdollers, Cristina

2021. A minimalist approach to the syntax of p . Linguistic Variation 21:1 ► pp. 90 ff.

Ursini, Francesco-Alessio

2021. Prolegomena to a theory of chorophorics. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 753 ff.

Rainsford, Thomas M.

2019. De-prefixed spatial Ps in medieval French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 277 ff.

Dékány, Éva

2018. The position of case markers relative to possessive agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:2 ► pp. 365 ff.

Terzi, Arhonto

2017. Complex Spatial Expressions. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.

Nchare, Abdoulaye Laziz & Arhonto Terzi

2014. Licensing silent structure: the spatial prepositions of Shupamem. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32:2 ► pp. 673 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Prepositions, Case and Verbal Prefixes [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 255],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.