In:Argument Structure
Edited by Eric J. Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya and Giorgos Spathas
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108] 2007
► pp. 37–48
The argument structure of the dative construction
Published online: 28 November 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108.06jay
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108.06jay
It is argued that the ‘dative construction’ – i.e. the construction in which an Experiencer or Possessor argument is realized as a DP marked with dative Case, and the VP has the form ‘be NP’ – alternates with two ‘nominative constructions’ (i.e. constructions in which the Experiencer/Possessor argument has nominative Case): one in which the VP has the form ‘have NP,’ and another in which the VP has the form ‘be AdjP’. We try to account for the three-way realization of the same underlying Lexical Relational Structure (LRS) in terms of incorporation: when the dative Case incorporates into ‘be,’ we get ‘have’; and when a Noun incorporates into dative Case, we get an Adjective.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mangialavori Rasia, M. Eugenia
2018. (And yet) another proposal for ser/estar
. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 177 ff.
Espanol-Echevarria, Manuel
2016. The interplay of silent nouns and (reduced) relatives in Malay adjectival modification. In Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 235], ► pp. 145 ff.
Menon, Mythili
2014. Property concepts and the apparent lack of adjectives in Dravidian. In The Lexicon–Syntax Interface [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 209], ► pp. 25 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
