In:Parentheticals
Edited by Nicole Dehé and Yordanka Kavalova
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106] 2007
► pp. 203–234
Invisible constituents? Parentheticals as b-merged adverbial phrases
Published online: 26 July 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.106.11vri
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.106.11vri
Parentheses are included in their host sentences, but at the same time they show unintegrated behavior. This article studies this Janus-faced phenomenon from a syntactic point of view. There are two main parts. The first introduces the term Invisibility for syntactic independence based on the absence of c‑command relations, which is a particular way of defining structural independence. A number of tests indicate that parentheses and other paratactic constituents are indeed invisible, but specific attention is paid to the various difficulties that show up in establishing such a conclusion. The examples are drawn primarily from Dutch and English. The second part develops a structural proposal for parentheses within a Minimalist type of grammar which takes into account their contradictory properties. Parentheses, it is argued, are adverbial phrases attached by means of a nonsubordinative inclusion relation that can be used in other paratactic configurations as well, in particular appositional constructions.
Cited by (59)
Cited by 59 other publications
Ke, Alan Hezao, Andrew McInnerney & Yushi Sugimoto
Driemel, Imke
McInnerney, Andrew
Holmstedt, Robert D.
Dehé, Nicole
DOBASHI, YOSHIHITO
Heine, Bernd
2018. Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 23 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2018. Interpersonal adverbs in FDG. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 47 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2020. The semantics, syntax and prosody of adverbs in English. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 191 ff.
Salminen, Jutta
Wiślicki, Jan
Colaço, Madalena & Gabriela Matos
2016. Explicative clauses in Portuguese as a case of parentheses. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10], ► pp. 43 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
2016. Chapter 2. On insubordination and cooptation. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 39 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016. Extra-clausal constituents. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries
Giorgi, Alessandra
2015. Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 229 ff.
Giorgi, Alessandra
Griffiths, James
MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA
MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA
MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA
Ott, Dennis
2015. Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation 15:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
Apresjan, Valentina
Griffiths, James & Mark de Vries
Griffiths, James & Mark de Vries
Abe, Jun & Norbert Hornstein
Biberauer, Theresa & Michelle Sheehan
Bošković, Željko
Bury, Dirk & Hiroyuki Uchida
Citko, Barbara
Epstein, Samuel David, Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely
Fábregas, Antonio
Gračanin‐Yuksek, Martina
Lahne, Antje
Lechner, Winfried
Miyamoto, Yoichi
Nunes, Jairo
Obata, Miki & Samuel David Epstein
Del Gobbo, Francesca
Bosveld-de Smet, Leonie & Mark de Vries
De Vries, Mark
de Vries, Mark
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2020. Dualistic approaches to the analysis of forms and structures in languages. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 157 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
