Article published In: Korean Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2015) ► pp.33–77
Overriding syntactic islands with prosodically marked wh-scope in South Kyŏngsang Korean and two dialects of Japanese
Published online: 15 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.1.02hwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.1.02hwa
This article explores the effect of discourse context and prosody on the resolution of wh-scope ambiguity in Tokyo Japanese, Fukuoka Japanese, and South Kyŏngsang Korean. It focuses on wh-islands in particular. There is little consensus in the literature as to whether wh-island effects are present in Japanese or Korean (Huang 1982, Nishigauchi 1990, Lee 1982, Suh 1987, among others). A production study, in which a scope-ambiguous wh-interrogative was preceded by a disambiguating discourse context, demonstrates that speakers’ scope interpretation is consistent with the preceding discourse context. An additional comprehension study reveals that prosodic wh-scope marking observed in the languages studied improves the acceptability of the matrix scope readings in violation of wh-islands. The experimental results support the view that wh-island effects can be overridden by plausible discourse contexts as well as the appropriate prosodic marking of wh-scope. These results highlight the interaction of grammatical knowledge, contextual factors, and prosody.
References (81)
Abrusán, Márta. 2011. Presuppositional and Negative Islands: A Semantic Account. Natural Language Semantics 191: 257–321.
Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman. 1988. Interaction with Context During Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 301: 191–238.
Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips, and Amy Weinberg. 2003. Processing of Japanese Wh-scrambling Constructions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.
Arnon, Inbal, Bruno Estigarribia, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Jeanette Pettibone, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider. 2005. Rethinking Superiority Effects: A Processing Model. Poster presented at the
CUNY Sentence Processing Conference
, University of Arizona.
Baker, C.L. 1970. Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Q Morpheme. Foundations of Language 61: 197–219.
Baltazani, Mary. 2002. Quantifier Scope and the Role of Intonation in Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 721: 32–68.
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Cynthia Breazeal & Linda B. Smith. 2007. Cognition as Coordinated Noncognition. Cognitive Processing 81: 79–91.
Choe, H.S. 1995. Focus and Topic Movement in Korean and Licensing. Discourse Configurational Languages ed. by K.E. Kiss, 269–334. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. London: SAGE Publications.
Crain, Stephen & Mark Steedman. 1985. On Not Being Led up the Garden Path: The Use of Context by the Psychological Parser. Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lauri Kartunnen, David Dowty & Arnold Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deguchi, Masanori & Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and Wh-questions. Proceedings of NELS 32 ed. by Masako Hirotani, 73–92. Amherst: GLSA.
Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition 68.1: 1–76.
. 2000. The Dependency Locality Theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium ed. by Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil, 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hawkins, John. 1999. Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. Language 75.2: 244–285.
Hayata, Teruhiro. 1985. Hakata hougen no akusento·keitairon [The accent and morphology of the Hakata dialect]. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.
Hirose, Yuki & Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2007. Production and perception of Prosody-Scope Correlation in Wh-interrogatives. Presentation at
Workshop on Prosody, Syntax and Information (WPSI) III
. Indiana University.
Hirotani, Masako. 2005. Prosody and LF Interpretation: Processing Japanese Wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive Constraints on Syntactic Islands. Language 861: 366–415.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Hwang, H.J. 2007. Wh-Phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean. In
Proceedings 17th JK Linguistic Conference
.
Hwang, Hyun Kyung. 2006. Intonation Patterns of Wh-interrogatives in South Kyungsang Korean and Fukuoka Japanese. Eoneohak, Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 451: 39–59.
. 2009. The Role of Prosody and Pragmatics on Wh-scope Assignment in Korean and Japanese.
Proceedings of CLS 45
.
. 2011a. Scope, Prosody and Pitch Accent: the Prosodic Marking of Wh-Scope in Two Varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
. 2011b. The Interaction of Accent and wh-question intonation in Korean and Japanese. Language Research 47.1: 45–70.
. 2011c. Distinct Types of Focus and Wh-question Intonation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 922–925.
. 2012. Wh-intonation and Information Structure in South Kyeongsang Korean and Tokyo Japanese. Information Structure: Contrasts and Positions ed. by A. Neeleman & Ivona Kucerova, 48–71. Cambridge University Press.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but Audible Wh-scope Marking: Wh-constructions and Deaccenting in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 21, ed. by Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts, 180–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
. 2003. Intonation and Interface Conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Jun, Sun-Ah & Mira Oh. 1996. A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-Phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 391: 37–61.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2005a. Prosody, Syntax and Pragmatics of Wh-questions in Japanese. English Linguistics 22.2: 302–346.
. 2005b. Wh-scope Puzzles. In
Proceedings of NELS 35, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa & Yuki Hirose. 2012. Appeals to Prosody in Japanese Wh-interrogatives—Speakers’ Versus Listeners’ Strategies. Lingua 122.6: 608–641.
Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the Distinction between Strong and Weak Islands: A Processing Perspective. Syntax and Semantics Volume 29: The Limits of Syntax ed. by Peter Culicover & Louise McNally, 241–279. Elsevier.
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a Processing Phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 81: 573–633.
Kubo, T. 1989. Hukuoka-si hougen no, dare·nani tou no gimonsi o hukumu bun no pitti pataan [The pitch patterns of sentences containing WH-words in the Fukuoka City dialect]. Kokugogaku 1561: 1–12.
. 1990. Hukuoka-si hougen no gimonsi hyougen no akusento kisoku [Accent rules for WH expressions in the Fukuoka dialect.] Kyuudai gengogaku kenkyuusitu houkoku 111: 103–118.
. 1993. Flat High Pitch and the Scope of Wh-words.
Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa 22
. Tokyo university of Foreign studies.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1988. The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh University. [reprinted in 1993, Kurosio Publishers].
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Kraljic, Tanya & Susan E. Brennan. 2005. Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Structure: For the Speaker or for the Addressee? Cognitive Psychology 50.2: 194–231.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 151: 235–289.
Miyamoto, Edson T. & Shoichi Takahashi. 2002. The Processing of Wh-phrases and Interrogative Complementizers in Japanese. Japanese Korean Linguistics 10 ed. by Noriko Akatuka & Susan Strauss, 62–75. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Nagahara, Hiroyuki. 1994. Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Nagel, H. Nicholas, Lewis P. Shapiro, Betty Tuller & Rebecca Nawy. 1996. Prosodic Influences on the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity during On-line Sentence Processing. Journal of Psycholing-uistie Research 251: 315–340.
Phillips, Colin. 2013. On the Nature of Island Constraints I: Language Processing and Reductionist Accounts. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects ed. by Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, & Shani H. Abada. 2005. ERP Effects of the Processing of Syntactic Long-distance Dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 221: 407–428.
Price, P.J., S. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Huffnagel, & C. Fong. 1991. The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 2956–2970.
Schafer, Amy J., Shari R. Speer, Paul Warren & S. David White. 2000. Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291: 169–182.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
. 2000. The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing. Prosody: Theory and Experiment ed. by M. Horne, 231–262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Schütze, Carson. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, J. 2010. Empirical Approaches to Fukuoka Japanese WH Prosody.
Proceedings of FAJL 5
ed. by Ryan Bennett, Anie Thompson & Matthew Tucker, MITWPL.
Smith, Jennifer. 2013. Fukuoka Japanese Wh Prosody in Production and Perception. Lingua 1241: 96–130.
Spivy, Michael & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 1998. Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 241: 1521–1543.
Sugahara, Mariko. 2003.
Downtrends and Post-FOCUS Intonation in Tokyo Japanese
. Ph.D dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Szabolcsi, Anna & Frans Zwarts. 1993. Weak Islands and an Algebraic Semantics of Scope Taking. Natural Language Semantics 11: 235–284.
Takahashi, Daiko. 1993. Movement of Wh-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 111: 655–678.
Thelen, Esther & B. Smith Linda. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tomioka, Satoshi. 1997. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and LF Syntax. Handout from the LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.
Venditti, Jennifer J. 2000.
Discourse Structure and Attentional Salience Effects on Japanese Intonation
. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Warren, Tessa & Edward Gibson. 2002. The Influence of Referential Processing on Sentence Complexity. Cognition 851: 79–112.
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, Cambridge: MITWPL.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Yun, Weonhee
Yun, Weonhee
Yun, Weonhee
Yun, Weonhee
Yun, Weonhee
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
