Cover not available

Article published In: Korean Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2015) ► pp.3377

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (81)
Abrusán, Márta. 2011. Presuppositional and Negative Islands: A Semantic Account. Natural Language Semantics 191: 257–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman. 1988. Interaction with Context During Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 301: 191–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips, and Amy Weinberg. 2003. Processing of Japanese Wh-scrambling Constructions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, Inbal, Bruno Estigarribia, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Jeanette Pettibone, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider. 2005. Rethinking Superiority Effects: A Processing Model. Poster presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference , University of Arizona.
Baker, C.L. 1970. Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Q Morpheme. Foundations of Language 61: 197–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary. 2002. Quantifier Scope and the Role of Intonation in Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 721: 32–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Cynthia Breazeal & Linda B. Smith. 2007. Cognition as Coordinated Noncognition. Cognitive Processing 81: 79–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choe, H.S. 1995. Focus and Topic Movement in Korean and Licensing. Discourse Configurational Languages ed. by K.E. Kiss, 269–334. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1991. Types of A’ dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1984. Binding Domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 141: 37–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Mark Steedman. 1985. On Not Being Led up the Garden Path: The Use of Context by the Psychological Parser. Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lauri Kartunnen, David Dowty & Arnold Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deguchi, Masanori & Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and Wh-questions. Proceedings of NELS 32 ed. by Masako Hirotani, 73–92. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition 68.1: 1–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Dependency Locality Theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium ed. by Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil, 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Hak-Sung. 1992. Notes on Reflexive Movement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 215–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1999. Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. Language 75.2: 244–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro. 1985. Hakata hougen no akusento·keitairon [The accent and morphology of the Hakata dialect]. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirose, Yuki & Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2007. Production and perception of Prosody-Scope Correlation in Wh-interrogatives. Presentation at Workshop on Prosody, Syntax and Information (WPSI) III . Indiana University.
Hirotani, Masako. 2005. Prosody and LF Interpretation: Processing Japanese Wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive Constraints on Syntactic Islands. Language 861: 366–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Hwang, H.J. 2007. Wh-Phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean. In Proceedings 17th JK Linguistic Conference .
Hwang, Hyun Kyung. 2006. Intonation Patterns of Wh-interrogatives in South Kyungsang Korean and Fukuoka Japanese. Eoneohak, Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 451: 39–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The Role of Prosody and Pragmatics on Wh-scope Assignment in Korean and Japanese. Proceedings of CLS 45 .
. 2011a. Scope, Prosody and Pitch Accent: the Prosodic Marking of Wh-Scope in Two Varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
. 2011b. The Interaction of Accent and wh-question intonation in Korean and Japanese. Language Research 47.1: 45–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011c. Distinct Types of Focus and Wh-question Intonation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 922–925.
. 2012. Wh-intonation and Information Structure in South Kyeongsang Korean and Tokyo Japanese. Information Structure: Contrasts and Positions ed. by A. Neeleman & Ivona Kucerova, 48–71. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but Audible Wh-scope Marking: Wh-constructions and Deaccenting in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 21, ed. by Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts, 180–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Intonation and Interface Conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Jun, Sun-Ah & Mira Oh. 1996. A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-Phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 391: 37–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2005a. Prosody, Syntax and Pragmatics of Wh-questions in Japanese. English Linguistics 22.2: 302–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Wh-scope Puzzles. In Proceedings of NELS 35, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa & Yuki Hirose. 2012. Appeals to Prosody in Japanese Wh-interrogatives—Speakers’ Versus Listeners’ Strategies. Lingua 122.6: 608–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert. 1998. On the Distinction between Strong and Weak Islands: A Processing Perspective. Syntax and Semantics Volume 29: The Limits of Syntax ed. by Peter Culicover & Louise McNally, 241–279. Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a Processing Phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 81: 573–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubo, T. 1989. Hukuoka-si hougen no, dare·nani tou no gimonsi o hukumu bun no pitti pataan [The pitch patterns of sentences containing WH-words in the Fukuoka City dialect]. Kokugogaku 1561: 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Hukuoka-si hougen no gimonsi hyougen no akusento kisoku [Accent rules for WH expressions in the Fukuoka dialect.] Kyuudai gengogaku kenkyuusitu houkoku 111: 103–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Flat High Pitch and the Scope of Wh-words. Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa 22 . Tokyo university of Foreign studies.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1988. The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh University. [reprinted in 1993, Kurosio Publishers].
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya & Susan E. Brennan. 2005. Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Structure: For the Speaker or for the Addressee? Cognitive Psychology 50.2: 194–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 151: 235–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Move Alpha: Conditions on its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, H.S. 1982. Asymmetry in Island Constrains in Korean. ms., UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1973. Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity. Glossa 71: 107–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Edson T. & Shoichi Takahashi. 2002. The Processing of Wh-phrases and Interrogative Complementizers in Japanese. Japanese Korean Linguistics 10 ed. by Noriko Akatuka & Susan Strauss, 62–75. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagahara, Hiroyuki. 1994. Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Nagel, H. Nicholas, Lewis P. Shapiro, Betty Tuller & Rebecca Nawy. 1996. Prosodic Influences on the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity during On-line Sentence Processing. Journal of Psycholing-uistie Research 251: 315–340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 2013. On the Nature of Island Constraints I: Language Processing and Reductionist Accounts. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects ed. by Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, & Shani H. Abada. 2005. ERP Effects of the Processing of Syntactic Long-distance Dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 221: 407–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. & Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Price, P.J., S. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Huffnagel, & C. Fong. 1991. The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 2956–2970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richard, Norvin. 2000. Wh-Island Effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 91: 187–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J., Shari R. Speer, Paul Warren & S. David White. 2000. Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291: 169–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing. Prosody: Theory and Experiment ed. by M. Horne, 231–262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2010. Empirical Approaches to Fukuoka Japanese WH Prosody. Proceedings of FAJL 5 ed. by Ryan Bennett, Anie Thompson & Matthew Tucker, MITWPL.
Smith, Jennifer. 2013. Fukuoka Japanese Wh Prosody in Production and Perception. Lingua 1241: 96–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spivy, Michael & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 1998. Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 241: 1521–1543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugahara, Mariko. 2003. Downtrends and Post-FOCUS Intonation in Tokyo Japanese . Ph.D dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Suh, C.M. 1987. Gukeo Uimummum Eongu [ A study on Korean interrogatives ]. Tower Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna & Frans Zwarts. 1993. Weak Islands and an Algebraic Semantics of Scope Taking. Natural Language Semantics 11: 235–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 1993. Movement of Wh-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 111: 655–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thelen, Esther & B. Smith Linda. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 1997. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and LF Syntax. Handout from the LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.
Venditti, Jennifer J. 2000. Discourse Structure and Attentional Salience Effects on Japanese Intonation . Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Warren, Tessa & Edward Gibson. 2002. The Influence of Referential Processing on Sentence Complexity. Cognition 851: 79–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti J. Price. 1992. Segmental Durations in the Vicinity of Prosodic Phrase Boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 921: 1707–1717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshida, T. 1998. Wh-operator vs. Yes/No-operator. ICU Language Research Bulletin 131: 159–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Lee, So-Young
2024. Scope and Prosody in Multiple Wh-Questions. Languages 9:7  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2021. A perceptual study of the wh-island constraint in Seoul Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 13:2  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2022. Perceptual discrimination of wh-scopes in Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 14:2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2023. Patterns of categorical perception and response times in the matrix scope interpretation of embedded wh-phrases in Gyeongsang Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 15:2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2024. A statistical analysis of wh-scope responses to embedded wh-phrases in Gyeongsang Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 16:2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2025. Wh-scope interpretation in Gyeongsang Korean: Prominence and individual differences in response times. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 17:2  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee, Ki-tae Kim & Sunwoo Park
2020. A prosodic cue representing scopes of wh-phrases in Korean: Focusing on North Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 12:3  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue