Article published In: Korean Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2014) ► pp.18–50
The ambiguity and alternative construals of the [X-ko iss-ta] construction in Korean
Published online: 7 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.16.1.02par
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.16.1.02par
This article analyzes the Korean [X-ko iss-ta] construction from the perspective of construal-based semantics, where the speaker’s choice and the grammatical context play an important role. The [X-ko iss-ta] construction exhibits ambiguity between the Progressive and the Resultant meanings. I argue that the Progressive reading is associated with the accomplishment construal of the construction, while the Resultant reading is associated with the achievement construal. I further argue that this type of alternative construal is motivated by the granularity observed ubiquitously in our everyday language. In terms of the function of -ko iss-, I argue that it segments out a smaller portion of the profiled semantic contour for focused viewing — an advantageous perspective from which to analyze stative verbs. My construal-based semantic analysis overcomes difficulties left by the previous proposals on the same topic.
References (43)
Bickel, Balthasar. 1997. Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102.2/3:115–131.
Binnick, Robert I. 2006. Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English Linguistics ed. by Bas Aarts & April McMahonm, 244–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Breu, Walter. 1994. Interactions between lexical, temporal, and aspectual meaning. Studies in Language 18.11: 23–44.
Chung, Taegoo. 2007. Kwuke concay kwumwunuy uymiwa saken kwuco [An event structure approach to the Korean existential construction]. Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 32.4: 779–801.
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2: 347–385.
Han, Dong-Wan. 1999. ‘ko iss’ kwusenguy cwunguysengey tayhaye [On the ambiguity of the ‘-ko iss’ construction]. Hanwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 51: 215–248.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johanson, Lars. 1996. Terminality operators and their hierarchical status. Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective ed. by Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera, 229–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe ed. by Östen Dahl, 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2011. Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA imperfective construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36.4: 863–885.
Kim, Min-Joo, 2009. A fresh look at the ambiguity puzzle of KO ISS imperfective in Korean.
Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on East Asian Linguistics
. [URL] (accessed 30 July 2013).
Kim, Min-Joo. 2011. The imperfect puzzle in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18 ed. by William McClure & Marcel den Dikken, 266–277. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Kim, Minju. 2011. Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. London: Saffron Books.
Kim, Namkil. 1986. The progressive in Korean. Studies in Korean Language and Linguistics ed. by Namkil Kim, 97–117. LA: East Asian Studies Center, USC.
Kwon, Iksoo. 2012. Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex: Evidence, Perception, Assessment, and Time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2008. Argument structure and event structure: the case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.2: 117–139.
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991. Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lee, Kee Dong. 1978.
Cotongsa isstauy uymi yenkwu [On the semantic nature of the auxiliary iss-ta]. Nwunmoy Huh Wung paksa hwankap nonmwuncip [Essays in Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Nwunmoy, Dr. Wung Huh] ed. by The Festschrift Committee, 359–387. Seoul, Korea: Kwahaksa.
Lee, Nam-Sun. 1981. Hyentay kwukeuy siceywa sangey tayhan yenkwu [Research on tense and aspect of Modern Korean]. Master Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusative: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1: 1–67.
Okuda, Yasuo. 1978a. Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, zyoo [On the study of aspect, I], Kyooiku Kokugo 531: 33–44. Recited from Shirai (1998).
1978b. Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, ge [On the study of aspect, II], Kyooiku Kokugo 541: 14–27. Recited from Shirai (1998).
Park, Yang-Kyu. 1985. Kwukeuy caykwui tongsaey kwanhaye [On Korean reflexive verbs]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 141: 361–382.
Rhee, Seongha. 1996. Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology61: 199–271.
Shirai, Yasuhiro, 1998. Where the progressive and the resultative meet: imperfective aspect in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and English. Studies in Language 22.3: 661–692.
Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application ed. by Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Ogihara, Toshiyuki & Eun-Hae Park
Chae, Hee-Rahk
Chae, Hee-Rahk
Chae, Hee-Rahk
서성기
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
