Article published In: Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2025) ► pp.179–216
Epistemic perspective of temporal deictics
A study on Mari retrospectivizing particles
Published online: 24 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00041.spe
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00041.spe
Abstract
Deictic items encoding coordinative dimensions of space and time
often grammaticalize into markers of epistemic categories. This study examines
what kind of epistemic system is formed by the tense-deictic retrospectivizing
particles əʎe/əʎə and
ulmaʃ/ələn in the Mari languages. Based on
a corpus study, the paper proposes a new perspective-based approach to the
evidentiality of the particle constructions and shows how they also participate
in a discourse-interactive custom of Common Ground management. Both functions
stem from the internal semantics of the particle constructions which in essence
are multiple perspective constructions expressing two observer positions with
respect to one state of affairs. Crucially, also spatial deictics express
epistemic differences based on observer positions, but they have different
communicational properties. Spatial environment allows intersubjective reference
to speaker and addressee perspectives, while the Mari temporal particle
constructions are fully speaker-anchored. Thus, the epistemic grammaticalization
potential of the two types of deictics is shown to be different.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Mari languages and current views on their retrospectivizing particles
- 2.1The profile of the Mari languages
- 2.2Current views on the syntax and semantics of the retrospectivizing particles
- 3.Multiple perspective constructions
- 3.1Mari retrospectivizing past tenses as multiple perspective constructions
- 3.2Types of multiple perspective constructions
- 4.Data and methods
- 5.Perspective-based evidential system of the Mari retrospectivizing
particles
- 5.1əʎe/əʎə as a marker of internal observation
- 5.2Ulmaʃ /ələn as a marker of external observation
- 6.Mari retrospectivizing particles in Common Ground management
- 6.1Common Ground management as an information structural process
- 6.2Types of common ground management functions of the Mari retrospectivizing
particles
- 6.2.1Assertive functions of əʎe/əʎə
- 6.2.2Contrastive and corrective functions of əʎe/əʎə
- 6.2.3Additive functions of əʎe/əʎə
- 6.2.4Information structural functions of əʎe/əʎə and ulmaʃ/ələn contrasted
- 7.Grammaticalization of epistemics from multiple perspective constructions
- 8.Summary and conclusions
- Notes
- Abbreviations
Sources References
References (58)
Alhoniemi, Alho. 1986. Marin kielen lukemisto
sanastoineen. [A reader of Mari
with a
vocabulary]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Egorkina, Elizaveta (Егоркина,
Елизавета). 2012. Ӹлӓ гӹнь шӹдӹр шӱмӹштет… Повесть дон
шайыштмаштвлӓ [Let a star live
in your heart… Novel and short
stories.] Yoshkar-Ola: Мары книгӓ издательство.
KS = Кырык сирышты. Повесть, лыдышвлӓ, пьесывлӓ,
очерк. [At the foot of a hill:
Short stories, poems, songs and
articles], edited by I. I. Taryanov [Тарьянов И.
И.] 1968. Yoshkar-Ola: Книгам лыкшы мары издательство.
KSYT = Кырык сирышты, Йыл тӹрышты. Лыдышвлӓ, шайыштмашвлӓ,
очерквлӓ. (At the foot of a
hill, on the bank of Volga. Poems, short stories and
articles), edited by I. Gornyi, A. Kanyushkov, V. Suzy, G. Matyukovskyi & S. Zakharov [Горный, И, А. Канюшков,
В. Сузы, Г. Матюковскый & С. Захаров] 1967. Кокшы выпуск. Yoshkar-Ola: Книгам лыкшы мары издательство.
Onchyko = Archive of
journal Ончыко [Onchyko] within the portal of Mari-Lab. Ончыко (PDF) — Mari-Lab (last
access 2
November 2024).
Agyagási, Klára. 2012. Language
contact in the Volga–Kama area. Studia
Uralo-Altaica 491. 21–37. Szeged: University of Szeged.
Alhoniemi, Alho. 1985. Marin kielioppi [A
grammar of Mari]. (Apuneuvoja
suomalais-ugrilaisten kielten opintoja varten
X.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Becker, Martin & Jakob Egetenmeyer. 2018. A
prominence-based account of temporal discourse
structure. Lingua 2141. 28–58.
Bereczki, Gábor. 2002. A cseremisz nyelv történeti
alaktana [Historical morphology
of Mari]. (Studies in Linguistics of the
Volga-Region, University of Debrecen Supplementum
I.) Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadója.
Bergqvist, Henrik. 2015. Epistemic
marking and multiple perspective: An
introduction. Sprachtypologie und
Universalienforschung:
STUF 68(2). 123–141.
. 2017b. Time
and commitment: the grammaticalization of uúch in Lakandon
Maya. Journal de la Société des
américanistes. Maya times. Hors-série. Tiempos
Mayas, 265–289.
. 2018. Intersubjectification
revisited: a cross-categorical
perspective. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), Epistemic
modalities and evidentiality in cross-linguistic
perspective, 319–345. Germany: De Gruyter, Inc.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the
world. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2007. Spatial
deictic tense and evidentials in
Korean. Natural Language
Semantics 151. 187–219.
Clifton, Charles Jr. & Lyn Frazier. 2012. Discourse
integration guided by the ‘Question under
Discussion’. Cognitive
Psychology 651. 352–379.
Evans, Nicholas. 2005. View
with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective
constructions. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics
Society 31(1). 93–120.
Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist & Lila San Roque. 2017a. The
grammar of engagement I: Framework and initial
exemplification. Language and
Cognition 101. 110–140.
Faller, Martina. 2004. The
deictic core of ‘non-experienced past’ in Cuzco
Quechua. Journal of
Semantics 211. 45–85.
Friedman, Victor A. 2018. Where
do evidentials come
from? In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greed, Teija. 2014. The
expression of knowledge in
Tatar. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The
grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic
typology, 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grzech, Karolina. 2020. Epistemic
primacy, Common Ground management and epistemic
perspective. In Henrik Bergqvist & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Evidentiality,
egophoricity and
engagement, 23–60. (Studies
in Diversity Linguistics
30.) Berlin: Language Science Press.
Haan, Ferdinand de. 2005. Encoding
speaker perspective:
Evidentials. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic
diversity and language
theories, 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. Mirativity
does not exist: Hdug in Lhasa Tibetan and other
suspects. Linguistic
Typology 16(3). 389–433.
Johanson, Lars. 2018. Turkic
Indirectivity. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 510–524. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From
discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural
language, formal logic and discourse representation
theory. Student
Edition. Dordrecht — Boston — London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kashkin, E. V., M.-E. A. Winkler, T. I. Davidyuk, V. V. Dyachkov, V. A. Ivanov, D. D. Mordashova, P. S. Pleshak & I. A. Khomchenkova [Кашкин Е. В., М.-Э. А
Винклер, Т. И. Давидюк, В. В. Дьячков, В. А. Иванов, Д. Д.
Мордашова, П. С. Плешак & И. А. Хомченкова.] 2023. Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом
освещении. [Elements
of Hill Mari language in light of
typology.] Москва: Буки Веди.
Krasnova, Nadezhda, Timothy Riese, Tatiana Yefremova & Jeremy Bradley. 2017. Reading
Hill Mari through Meadow
Mari. Vienna. Available
at: [URL] (last
access 2
November 2024).
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic
notions of information
structure. In Caroline Fery & Manfred Krifka (eds.) Interdisciplinary
Studies on Information Structure
6, 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. [URL] (2 November
2024).
Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan. 2012. Information
structure: Overview and linguistic
issues. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The
expression of information
structure, 1–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kubitsch, Rebeka. 2023. Evidencialitás az udmurt
nyelvben. [Evidentiality
in the Udmurt
language]. Szeged: University of Szeged, Ph.D.
dissertation. [URL] (2 November
2024).
Kuram, Kadri. 2023. Common
ground management via evidential markers in
Turkish. Pragmatics and
Society, 275–294.
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity,
evidentiality, mediativity, or
other? Linguistic
Typology 31. 91–109.
Leinonen, Marja. 2000. Evidentiality
in Komi
Zyryan. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials:
Turkic, Iranian and neighboring
languages, 419–440. (Empirical
Approaches to Language Typology 24.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense
and time reference in
English. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies
in Linguistic
Semantics, 97–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality
and epistemological stance: Narrative
retelling. (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series
87.) Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pengitov, N. T., I. S. Galkin & N. I. Isanbaev [Пенгитов, Н. Т, И. С.
Галкин & Н. И. Исанбаев]. 1961. Современный марийский язык.
Морфология) [Modern Mari
language:
Morphology]. Yoshkar-Ola: Марийское книжное издательство.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2010. Types
of verbal evidentiality marking: an
overview. In Gabriele Diewald & Elena, Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic
realization of evidentiality in European
languages, 15–58. (Empirical
Approaches to Language Typology
49.) Göttingen: Mouton de Gruyter.
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Johan van der Auwera. 2006. Towards
a typology of discontinuous past
marking. Language Typology and
Universals 59(4). 317–349.
Saarinen, Sirkka. 2022. Mari. In: Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso and Elena Skribnik (eds.), The
Oxford guide to the Uralic
languages, 432–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saraheimo, Mari & Rebeka Kubitsch. 2023. Discourse-interactional
functions of Udmurt val and
vylem. Linguistica
Uralica 591. 130–153.
Skribnik, Elena & Petar Kehayov. 2018. Evidentials
in Uralic
languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 525–553. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spets, Silja-Maija. 2023. Temporal
perspective and its formal background: An explanation for aspectual synonymy
between simple and analytic past tenses in
Mari. Journal de la Société
Finno-Ougrienne 991. 275–318.
. 2025a. (De)grammaticalization of Mari retrospectivizing particles. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 491.
. 2025b. Encoding
discontinuativity by Mari retrospectivizing particle
constructions. Finnisch-Ugrische
Forschungen 701.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common
Ground. Linguistics and
Philosophy 25(5/6). 701–721. [URL]
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge,
morality and affiliation in social
interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jacob Steensig (eds.), The
morality of knowledge in
conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uchaev, Z. V. [Учаев, З.
В.]. 1985. Марий йылме. Кокымшо ужаш. Факультативный занятийым эртарыме
учебный пособий. Туныктышо-влаклан. [The
Mari language. Second part. Teaching aids for optional classes. For
teachers.] Yoshkar-Ola: Марийское книжное издательство.
Wiemer, Björn. 2018. Evidentials
and epistemic
modality. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 85–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A
cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of
evidentiality. Studies in
Language 12(1). 51–97.
