Article published In: (Inter)subjectivity across registers of Estonian: Special issue of the Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 (2024)
Edited by Helle Metslang, Tiit Hennoste and Külli Habicht
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2] 2024
► pp. 265–296
Pragmatic particles as distinguishing features of registers
Published online: 8 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00033.pri
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00033.pri
Abstract
The study explores the potential of utilizing particle use data to differentiate between seven Estonian registers:
everyday conversation, institutional interaction, printed media (newspapers), prose fiction, academic prose, instant messaging,
and internet comments. The objective is to develop a simple yet effective model that enables researchers to comprehend the
internal logic behind register differentiation based on particle use. Particles are considered promising differentiators due to
their independence from text content.
The article outlines the chosen method, the model creation, and the testing process. A key finding reveals that
hierarchical relationships between particles within registers prove more reliable indicators than general use frequencies. The
method involves establishing correspondences between particle pairs and register pairs, facilitating the measurement of distances
between registers. During testing, the model demonstrates high accuracy across registers, encountering some difficulties in
categorizing fiction and institutional interaction. Overall, the study confirms the efficacy of the proposed method in
distinguishing registers based on particle use, underscoring the significance of particles in linguistic analysis.
Keywords: particles, frequency, differentiators, spoken language, internet language, printed texts, Estonian
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Material and method
- 2.1Corpus and distribution of particles
- 2.2Background regarding the choice of register differentiation method
- 2.3Working method: Comparison pairs
- 3.Model
- 4.Test
- 4.1Academic prose
- 4.2Print media
- 4.3Fiction
- 4.4Internet comments
- 4.5Instant messaging
- 4.6Institutional conversation
- 4.7Everyday conversation
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
- Note
- Abbreviations
References
References (19)
Alumäe, Tanel, Ottokar Tilk & Ullah Asad. 2018. Advanced
rich transcription system for Estonian speech. In Kadri Muischnek & Kaili Müürisep (eds.), Human
language technologies — the Baltic perspective: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, Baltic HLT
2018, 1–8. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Amer, Ali A. & Hassan I. Abdalla. 2020. A
set theory based similarity measure for text clustering and classification. Journal of Big
Data 74 (7).
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register,
genre, and style. (Cambridge Textbooks in
Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossley, Scott A. & Max M. Louwerse. 2007. Multi-dimensional
register classification using bigrams. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 12 (4). 453–478.
Demerau, Fred J. 1975. The use of function word
frequencies as indicators of style. Computers and the
Humanities 9 (6). 271–280.
Foolen, Ad. 1996. Pragmatic
particles. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook
of pragmatics online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hennoste, Tiit, Gerson Klumpp & Helle Metslang. 2022a. Diskursusemarkerid ja pragmaatika. Sissejuhatuseks [Discourse
markers and pragmatics: Introduction]. Keel ja
Kirjandus 1–21. 3–18.
Hennoste, Tiit, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Helle Metslang, Kirsi Laanesoo, Liina Pärismaa, Elen Pärt, Andra Rumm, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul. 2022b. Komplementlausega predikaatidel põhinevate diskursusemarkerite kasutus eri
registrites [Complement-taking predicate markers in different registers in
Estonian]. Keel ja
Kirjandus 1–21. 130–150.
Hennoste, Tiit, Helle Metslang, Külli Habicht & Külli Prillop. 2021. Kuue (inter)subjektiivsuspartikli kasutus eesti keele registrites [The use of six (inter)subjectivity particles in Estonian registers]. Emakeele
Seltsi
aastaraamat 66 (1). 91–123.
Hennoste, Tiit, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Helle Metslang, Kirsi Laanesoo, David Ogren, Liina Pärismaa, Elen Pärt, Andra Rumm, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul. 2024. Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers: The case of
Estonian. Journal of Uralic
Linguistics 31. 159–186.
Jonsson, Ewa. 2015. Conversational
writing: A multidimensional study of synchronous and supersynchronous computer-mediated
communication. New York: Peter Lang.
Olev, Aivo & Tanel Alumäe. 2022. Estonian
speech recognition and transcription editing service. Baltic Journal of Modern
Computing 10 (3). 409–421.
Paumäe, Pamela & Reili Argus. 2023. Modaalpartiklid jutusaates „Keskpäevatund“ [Modal particles in
the talk show ‘Keskpäevatund’]. In Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Mart Velsker & Roosmarii Kurvits (eds.), Kahtlus ja mõttemäss: Pühendusteos Tiit Hennoste 70. sünnipäevaks [A
festschrift for Tiit Hennoste’s 70th
birthday], 109–122. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli kirjastus.
Pic, Elsa & Grégory Furmaniak. 2012. A
study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: the case of possibility adverbs perhaps, maybe and
possibly. Revista de Lenguas para Fines
Especificos 181. 13–44. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle. PRES Sorbonne Pris Cite — Primes EA 4398.
Pho, Phuong Dzung. 2012. Authorial stance in research
article abstracts and introductions from two disciplines. In Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois & Juliane House (eds.), Subjectivity
in language and in discourse, 97–114. (Studies in
Pragmatics
10). Leiden: Brill.
Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Habicht & Helle Metslang. 2021. Ei saa me läbi „Pragmaatika“ korpuseta. Korpuspragmaatika ja
pragmaatikakorpus [We can’t get by without the pragmatics corpus. Corpus
pragmatics and the pragmatics
corpus]. Mäetagused 811. 161–176.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hennoste, Tiit, Külli Prillop, Külli Habicht, Helle Metslang, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, David Ogren, Liina Pärismaa, Elen Pärt, Andra Rumm, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul
2024. Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht, Tiit Hennoste, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Külli Prillop, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
