Cover not available

Article published In: (Inter)subjectivity across registers of Estonian: Special issue of the Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 (2024)
Edited by Helle Metslang, Tiit Hennoste and Külli Habicht
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2] 2024
► pp. 158–185

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers

The case of Estonian

 | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
 | NEIFI LLC, United States
 | University of Tartu, Estonia | Tallinn Kristiine High School, Estonia
 | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
 | University of Tartu, Estonia
ORCiD logo with link | University of Tartu, Estonia
Published online: 8 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
Abstract
The article analyzes the frequency of downtoners and intensifiers in seven Estonian registers based on data from the Estonian Pragmatics Corpus. These particles are most common in instant messaging, followed by institutional interaction, everyday conversation, online comments, printed fiction, media, and academic prose. The analysis revealed that previously offered situational features that increase frequencies (orality, spontaneity, dialogicity, everydayness and involved production) correlate only with frequencies of downtoners in comments, fiction and media. The frequency of downtoners in instant messaging is significantly higher than in spoken dialogues, and the use of all particles in academic prose is significantly lower than expected. We propose hypotheses to explain those anomalies. Ten especially frequent particles were identified: six downtoners and four intensifiers. Those particles account for 15% of all downtoners/intensifiers and account for 76% of particle use, with their proportion varying across registers from 87% in everyday conversation to 43% in academic prose.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Registers, situational features and particles
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall distribution of particles
    • 4.2Basic downtoners
    • 4.3Basic intensifiers
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (58)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10). Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Argus, Reili, Katrin Kern & Helika Mäekivi. 2022. Keeletoimetamine [Language editing]. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 2013. Instant messaging. In Susan S. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (Handbooks of Pragmatics 9), 135–161. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, genre, and style. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert. 2018. Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language. Exploring orality and literacy, 35–53. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle. 2022. Register and social media. Register Studies 4(2). 133–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle & Jack Grieve. 2019. Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: a linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLOS ONE 14(9). 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2023. Register in corpus linguistics: the role and legacy of Douglas Biber. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 19 (1). 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber (eds.). 2001. Variation in English: Multidimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daems, Jocelyne, Dirk Speelman & Tom Ruette. 2013. Register analysis in blogs: Correlation between professional sector and functional dimensions. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 2(1). 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada. 2019. Are online news comments like face-to-face conversation? A multidimensional analysis of an emerging register. MS (published in Register Studies 2020, 2:1. 1–36).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Characterising online news comments: A multidimensional cruise through online registers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EKG II = Mati Erelt, Reet Kasik, Helle Metslang, Henno Rajandi, Kristiina Ross, Henn Saari, Kaja Tael & Silvi Vare. 1993. Eesti keele grammatika. II. Süntaks. lisa: kiri. [Grammar of Estonian II]. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Tiiu Erelt & Kristiina Ross. 2020. Eesti keele käsiraamat [Handbook of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad. 1996. Pragmatic particles. In Frank Brisard, Pedro Gras, Sigurd D’hondt & Mieke Vandenbrouck (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics online, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner. 2020. Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics 61. 435–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Douglas Biber, Eric Friginal & Tatiana Nekrasova. 2010. Variation among blogs: A multidimensional analysis. In Alexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff & Marina Santini (eds.), Genres on the web: Computational models and empirical studies, 303–322. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 32 (3). 182–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit. 2012. Enda algatatud eneseparandus eestikeelsetes MSN-i dialoogides [Self-initiated self-repair in Estonian instant messaging interaction]. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat 8 = Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics 81. 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Suuline keel [Spoken language]. In Helle Metslang (ed.), Eesti grammatika [Estonian grammar], 997–1181. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit & Karl Pajusalu. 2013. Eesti keele allkeeled [Varietes of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Gerson Klumpp & Helle Metslang. 2022. Diskursusemarkerid ja pragmaatika. Sissejuhatuseks [Discourse markers and pragmatics: Introduction]. Keel ja Kirjandus 65 (1–2), 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Helle Metslang, Külli Habicht & Külli Prillop. 2021. Kuue (inter)subjektiivsuspartikli kasutus eesti keele registrites [The use of six (inter)subjectivity particles in Estonian registers]. Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 661. 91–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennoste, Tiit, Olga Gerassimenko, Riina Kasterpalu, Mare Koit, Kirsi Laanesoo, Anni Oja, Andriela Rääbis & Krista Strandson. 2010. The structure of a discontinuous dialogue formed by internet comments. In Petr Sojka, Aleš Horák, Ivan Kopeček & Karel Pala (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue, 515–522. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1990. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication 101. 185–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text 181. 349–382.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jonsson, Ewa. 2015. Conversational writing: A multidimensional study of synchronous and supersynchronous computer-mediated communication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehayov, Petar. 2009. Interaction between grammatical evidentials and lexical markers of epistemicity and evidentiality: A case study of Bulgarian and Estonian. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 721. 165–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel. 2014. The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 11. 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and women’s place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning 50:4, 675–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 2007. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metslang, Helle. 2023. Kolme (inter)subjektiivsusmarkeri lugu: ehk, äkki, järsku [The story of three (inter)subjectivity markers: ehk, äkki, järsku]. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri = Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 14(2). 271–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht, Tiit Hennoste, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Külli Prillop, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul. 2024. (Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers: Introduction. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 31. 119–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998/2009. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman & James W. Pennebaker. 2008. Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 451. 211–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paumäe, Pamela & Reili Argus. 2023. Modaalpartiklid jutusaates „Keskpäevatund“. [Modal particles in “Midday news”]. In Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Mart Velsker & Roosmarii Kurvits (eds.), Kahtlus ja mõttemäss: Pühendusteos Tiit Hennoste 70. sünnipäevaks, 109–122. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli kirjastus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pic, Elsa & Grégory Furmaniak. 2012. A study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: The case of possibility adverbs perhaps, maybe and possibly. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Especificos 181. 13–44. [URL] (8 July, 2024)
Prillop, Külli & Külli Habicht. 2022. Vist või kindlasti? Tõenäosuspartikli vist pikk teekond eesti kirjakeeles [The long journey of the probability particle vist in literary Estonian]. Keel ja Kirjandus 65 (1–2). 35–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Habicht & Helle Metslang. 2021. Ei saa me läbi “Pragmaatika” korpuseta. Korpuspragmaatika ja pragmaatikakorpus [We can’t get by without the pragmatics corpus. Corpus pragmatics and the pragmatics corpus]. Mäetagused 811. 161–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste & Helle Metslang. 2024. Pragmatic particles as distinguishing features of registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 31. 266–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1989. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rääbis, Andriela & Andra Rumm. 2022. Tahan lihtsalt koju saada. Vähendav ja tugevdav partikkel lihtsalt hädaabikõnedes [Downgrading and upgrading with the particle lihtsalt in Estonian emergency calls]. Keel ja Kirjandus 65 (1–2). 54–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2007. Conversation in context: A corpus-driven approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan P. De Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 1061. 10587–10592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valdmets, Annika. 2011. Kahe eesti kirjakeele modaalpartikli arengust viimase sadakonna aasta jooksul [On the development of two modal particles in written Estonian over the last century]. Keel ja Kirjandus 54(10). 764–776. [URL] (11 July, 2024)
Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse particles. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 21, 2012–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Online materials
CombiDic = EKI ühendsõnastik [The EKI Combined Dictionary]. Compilers and editors Indrek Hein, Jelena Kallas, Olga Kiisla, Kristina Koppel, Margit Langemets, Tiina Leemets, Maia Melts, Sirje Mäearu, Tiina Paet, Peeter Päll, Maire Raadik, Mai Tiits, Katrin Tsepelina, Maria Tuulik, Udo Uibo, Tiia Valdre & Ülle Viks. [URL] (11 July, 2024)
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Habicht, Külli, Külli Prillop & Carl Eric Simmul
2024. From certainty to uncertainty. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Laanesoo-Kalk, Kirsi
2024. Functions of the particles tõesti ‘really’ and tõepoolest ‘indeed’ in the spoken, online and printed registers of Estonian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht, Tiit Hennoste, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Külli Prillop, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul
2024. (Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste & Helle Metslang
2024. Pragmatic particles as distinguishing features of registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue