Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2023) ► pp.194–213

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Case and agreement puzzle in the Moksha debitive

 | HSE UniversityMoscow
Published online: 16 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00020.shi
Abstract
This paper is dedicated to the debitive construction in Moksha Mordvin, which exhibits patterns unusual for a dative-infinitive construction (DIC). The non-finite verb can agree with its internal argument but not with the external one. The internal argument can bear both the definite nominative case, which is otherwise restricted to subjects of finite clauses, and the definite genitive case, which can mark both direct objects and definite possessors. Personal agreement is mandatory in the former case but prohibited in the latter. I propose that the Moksha debitive construction includes a null modal verb that assigns dative to the external argument of the infinitive. The case marking on the internal argument is determined by its structural position, in accordance with Dependent Case Theory. The case of Moksha demonstrates that the dative case in DICs can be inherent (contra what has been argued on the basis of Russian DICs) and that an argument for biclausality can be constructed based on case and agreement patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Moksha debitive
  • 2.Analysis
    • 2.1Null matrix modal verb
    • 2.2Is dative structural?
    • 2.3Position of the internal argument and the case and agreement pattern
      • 2.3.1Moksha case system
      • 2.3.2The agreement probe
      • 2.3.3Where is the internal argument?
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Glossing abbreviations
  • References
References (38)
References
Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Christina Sevdali. 2020. Two modes of dative and genitive case assignment: Evidence from two stages of Greek. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 381. 987–1051. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2004. The case of Q. In Proceedings of FASL, vol. 121, 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 161.373–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Case. Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrie, Michael & Christine Pittman. 2010. Mandatives: Lessons on raising/control diagnostics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 551. 131–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bikina, Daria. 2021. Moksha “definite” declension, D-linking, and global choice functions. Talk given at Southern New England Workshop in Semantics, UConn (virtually). [URL]
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burukina, Irina. 2020. Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 51. 54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2004. Restructuring in English. Unpublished manuscript. MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efremov, Evgenii. 2020. Dative case with infinitives in Russian. In Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. [URL]
Egorova, Anastasia. 2018. Sentencial’nye aktanty [Sentential arguments]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 666–706. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Marta Grzybowska. 2014. Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction: The Latvian debitive. In Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic, 97–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kashkin, Egor. 2018. Opredelënnost’ [Definiteness]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 122–152. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kholodilova, Maria. 2018a. Imennaja predikacija [Nominal predication]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 616–632. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Morfologija imeni [Nominal morphology]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 63–121. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozlov, Alexey. 2018. Glagol [Verb]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 341–395. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2000. Case and licensing. In Eric J. Reuland (ed.), Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s generalization, 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 2001. Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 321. 141–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marušič, Franc & Rok Žaucer. 2006. On the intensional FEEL-LIKE construction in Slovenian: A case of a phonologically null verb. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 241. 1093–1159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murav’ëva, Aleksandra & Maria Kholodilova. 2018. Poslelogi i reljacionnye imena [Postpositions and relational nouns]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 212–248. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pleshak, Polina. 2015. Semantics and morphosyntax of Moksha possessive constructions. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 1111. 379–393.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. The exponence of caseless NPs in Moksha. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 61. 628–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. The status of Dative case in the Moksha case paradigm. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 51. 108–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. to appear. Taxonomies of case and ontologies of case. In Elena Anagnostopoulou, Christina Sevdali & Dionysios Mertyris (eds.), On the place of case in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rivero, María Luisa. 2003. Reflexive clitic constructions with datives: syntax and semantics. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 111, 469–494.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2001. On the nature of default case. Syntax 41. 205–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. University of Lund dissertation.
Stenin, Ivan. 2018. Passiv [Passive voice]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 491–545. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toldova, Svetlana. 2017. Kodirovanie prjamogo dopolnenija v mokšanskom jazyke [Encoding direct objects in Moksha]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 131. 123–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Predikacii s glagolʹnym skazuemym [Clauses with verbal predicates]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 546–615. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toldova, Svetlana & Maria Kholodilova (eds.). 2018. Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective]. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsedryk, Egor. 2017. Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian: Are they really biclausal. In Wayles Browne, Miloje Despic, Naomi Enzinna, Simone Harmath-de Lemos, Robin Karlin & Draga Zec (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 251, 298–317. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 371. 111–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2003. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zakirova, Aigul. 2018. Nominalizacii [Nominalisations]. In Svetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 753–778. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue