Article published In: Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2023) ► pp.214–241
Reported speech and its extensions in Beserman
Published online: 16 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00019.ark
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00019.ark
Abstract
This paper presents a descriptive account of reported speech, understood in terms of Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina. 2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 231. 119–159. , in Beserman (Uralic > Permic). Two phenomena are described in particular. First, it is demonstrated that, although Beserman generally prefers the direct speech strategy, the interpretation of indexicals in certain contexts may be affected by pragmatic factors. Second, Beserman allows for agreement mismatch between the subject and the predicate of the reported clause, known as “monstrous agreement”. This phenomenon has not been attested in Permic languages before. Apart from that, extended uses of two Beserman reported speech markers are described, whereby they convey pragmatic meanings that resemble English kind of or like. This semantic development reverses a well-known grammaticalization path that turns such pragmatic elements into reported speech markers. The study is based on both corpus and elicited data.
Keywords: reported speech, pragmatics, indexicals, monstrous agreement, Beserman, Udmurt
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Reported speech markers
- 3.Interpretation of indexicals and pragmatics
- 4.Agreement mismatch
- 5.Pragmatic uses of reported speech markers
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (49)
Andersen, Gisle. 1998. The pragmatic marker like from a Relevance-theoretic perspective. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Pragmatics & beyond: New series, vol. 571, 147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen. 2012. Preface: Introductory remarks on new and old quotatives. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), xi–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Claridge, Claudia. 2013. The evolution of three pragmatic markers: As it were, so to speak/say and if you like. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 141. 161–184.
Cysouw, Michael & Jeff Good. 2013. Languoid, doculect and glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language.’ Language Documentation and Conservation 71. 331–359.
Davidse, Kristin & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2011. Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 236–250.
Dömötör, Adrienne. 2015. A mondván és az úgymond: diskurzusjelölő elemek keletkezése idéző szerkezetekből [Mondván and úgymond: The emergence of discourse markers from quoting constructions]. Magyar Nyelv 1111. 21–37.
Evans, Nicholas. 2013. Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganenkov, Dmitry. 2016. Eccentric agreement can be monstrous. Presented at the 39th GLOW Conference, Göttingen, April 5–8, 2016.
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT]). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2012. Thetic speaker-instantiating quotative indexes as a cross-linguistic type. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), 117–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karpova, Lyudmila. 2013. Leksika severnogo narechija udmurtskogo jazyka [Vocabulary of the Northern dialect of the Udmurt language]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
Kasenov, Daniar. 2021. Indexical shift and monstrous agreement in Balkar. Presented at the 18th Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Kelmakov, Valentin. 1998. Kratkij kurs udmurtskoj dialektologii [A brief course on Udmurt dialectology]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
Khachaturyan, Elizaveta. 2020. Marqueurs discursifs du dire (français, russe, norvégien): Des sémantiques lexicales différentes pour des stratégies énonciatives similaires? [Discursive markers of “say” (French, Russian, Norwegian): Different lexical semantics for similar speech strategies?]. Corela (HS-31).
Kibardina, Tatyana. 2012. Sredstva vyrazhenija modal’nosti v udmurtskom jazyke [Means of expression of modality in Udmurt]. Mozhga: Udmurtskij universitet.
Kirillova, Lyudmila (ed.). 2008. Udmurtsko-russkij slovar’: Ok. 50000 slov [Udmurt–Russian dictionary: ca. 50,000 headwords]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
Klumpp, Gerson. 2016. Semantic functions of complementizers in Permic languages. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57), 529–586. De Gruyter Mouton.
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2022. SAY-complementizers and indexical shift in Poshkart Chuvash: With emphasis on communicative reception reports. Studies in Language 461. 402–452.
Kolyaseva, Alena. 2021. The divergent paths of pragmaticalization: The case of the Russian particles tipa and vrode. Journal of Pragmatics 2011. 181–196.
König, Ekkehard. 2002. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London / New York: Routledge.
Lytkin, Vasiliy. 1962. Komi-Jaz’vinskij dialekt [Yazva Komi dialect]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
. 1964. Istoricheskij vokalizm permskix jazykov [Historical vocalism of the Permic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.
Matić, Dejan & Brigitte Pakendorf. 2013. Non-canonical SAY in Siberia: Areal and genealogical patterns. Studies in Language 371. 356–412.
Messick, Troy. 2017. The morphosyntax of self-ascription: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012. Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 161. 233–263.
Podobryaev, Alexander. 2014. Persons, imposters, and monsters. PhD dissertation, MIT. [URL]
Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Svetlana Toldova. 2010. Grammaticalization of the verb of speech in Finno-Ugric languages. In Congressus XI Internationalis Finno-Ugristarum. Pars VI: Dissertationes symposiorum ad linguisticam. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.
. 2014. Glagol rechi manaš v marijskom jazyke: osobennosti grammatikalizacii [The verb of speaking manaš in the Mari language: Peculiarities of grammaticalization]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61. 66–91.
Skribnik, Elena. 2022. Clause combining. In Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, and Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 996–1017. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sorvacheva, V. (ed.). 1961. Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ komi-zyrjanskix dialektov [Comparative dictionary of Komi-Zyrian dialects]. Syktyvkar: Komi knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli. 2021. In a manner of speaking: How reported speech may have shaped grammar. Frontiers in Communication 61. 624486.
Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina. 2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 231. 119–159.
Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2011. A plea for syntax and a return to first principles: monstrous agreement in Tamil. In Proceedings of SALT 211, 674–693.
Tánczos, Orsolya. 2013. Hogy ... hogy? Kettős kötőszók az udmurt mondatban [That... that? Double conjunctions in the Udmurt sentence]. In Klára Agyagási, Attila Hegedűs & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), Nyelvelmélet és kontaktológia 21., 95–112. Piliscsaba: PPKE BTK Magyar Nyelvészeti Tanszék.
Teptiuk, Denys. 2019. Quotative indexes in Finno-Ugric (Komi, Udmurt, Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian). Tartu University. [URL]
Teptiuk, Denys & Johannes Hirvonen. 2021. Perspective shift in reported discourse of Finno-Ugric languages. Presented at 54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Athens, August 31 – September 3, 2021.
Tyshkevich, Natalia. 2014. Kosvennaja rech’ v besermjanskom dialekte udmurtskogo jazyka [Indirect speech in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt]. Presented at the 2nd Workshop on Beserman and Mari studies, Moscow, February 28, 2014.
Usacheva, Maria, Timofey Arkhangelskiy, Olga Biryuk, Vladimir Ivanov & Ruslan Idrisov. 2017. Tezaurus besermjanskogo narechija: Imena i sluzhebnye chasti rechi (govor derevni Shamardan) [Thesaurus of the Beserman supradialect: Nominals and functional parts of speech (Shamardan village variety)]. Moscow: Izdatel’skie reshenija.
Usacheva, Maria N. 2021. Dialogue-focused experiments in the field: Advantages and disadvantages (a Permic experience). In Tatiana B. Agranat & Leyli R. Dodykhudoeva (eds.), Strategies for knowledge elicitation, 27–62. Cham: Springer.
Vakhrushev, Vasiliy, V. Zakharov & L. Kalinina. 1974. Grammatika sovremennogo udmurtskogo jazyka. Sintaksis slozhnogo predlozhenija [Grammar of contemporary Udmurt. Syntax of the complex sentence]. Izhevsk: Udmurtskij NII istorii, ekonomiki, literatury i jazyka.
Van der Houwen, Fleur. 2012. The effect of genre on reporting speech: conversations and newspaper articles. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 11. 101.
Winkler, Eberhard. 2011. Udmurtische Grammatik [Udmurt grammar] (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 81). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Zakirova, Aygul & Alexey Kozlov. 2022. The emphatic identity particle =OK in the Volga-Kama Sprachbund. Presented at Congressus XIII Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Vienna, August 21–26, 2022.
