Cover not available

Article published In: Approaches to Hungarian 17: Special issue of the Journal on Uralic Linguistics 1:2 (2022)
Edited by Tamás Halm, Elizabeth Coppock and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2] 2022
► pp. 181–214

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Hárman, sokan, mindannyian

A presuppositional analysis to -AN-marked numerals and quantifiers in Hungarian

 | Afeka Tel Aviv Academic College of Engineering, Israel
Published online: 17 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00009.sch
Abstract
This paper examines the semantics of -AN-suffixed numerals and quantifiers in Hungarian. The main aim is to provide a compositional analysis that captures the wide variety of uses of -AN-marked numerals. While in the literature -AN has been treated as an adverbial suffix, I claim that the -AN-marking on numerals and quantifiers is a different mechanism than its phonologically similar adverbial counterpart. I present a number of grammatical phenomena in support of the assumption that -AN is associated with the [+plural] and [+human] features and I propose that they are realized as a presupposition. I argue that -AN is a predicate at type <e,t>, λx: HUMANS.(x) and show that -AN-suffixed numerals are complex predicates that presuppose a plurality of human beings and have the cardinality property provided by the numeral. In accounting for all positions -AN-marked numerals and quantifiers occur in, two main categories emerge: the predicative position and adnominal pronominal constructions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Ruling out alternative analyses
    • 2.1-AN is not a collective suffix
    • 2.2-AN is not an adverbial suffix
  • 3.Inherent features: [+human], [+plural]
    • 3.1Humanness
    • 3.2Pluralness
  • 4.The analysis
    • 4.1-AN: A predicate at type <e,t>
    • 4.2Numerals
    • 4.3The semantics of NUM-AN
      • 4.3.1A presuppositional approach
  • 5.Accounting for the range of constructions
    • 5.1NUM-AN in predicative position
    • 5.2NUM-AN in adnominal pronominal constructions
      • 5.2.1NUM-AN in extended personal pronoun DPs
      • 5.2.2NUM-AN in focus, topic, and contrastive topic positions
      • 5.2.3NUM-AN with quantifiers
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (65)
References
Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper. 1983. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 41. 159–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bende-Farkas, Ágnes. 2014. From A-quantification to D-quantification: Universal quantifiers in the sentence and in the Noun Phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 83–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. The semantics of Old Hungarian floating mind ‘all’. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian, ICSH11, Bucharest, June 7. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisson, Christine M. 1998. Distributivity, maximality and floating quantifiers. New Brunswick: Rutgers University PhD dissertation.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics 61. 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko & Anna Szabolcsi. 2012. Quantification in Hungarian. In Edward L. Keenan & Denis Paperno (eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language, 399–465. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva K. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Tromsø: University of Tromsø PhD dissertation. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Dékány, Éva & Aniko Csirmaz. 2018. Numerals and quantifiers. In Gábor Alberti & Tibor Laczkó (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and noun phrases, vol. 21, 1044–1150. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Dékány, Éva & Veronika Hegedűs. 2015. Word order variation in Hungarian PPs. In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference, vol. 141, 95–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1987. Collective predicates, distributive predicates and all. In Ann Miller & Zheng-sheng Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the 1986 Eastern States Conference on linguistics, 97–115. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. & Belinda Brodie. 1984. The semantics of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 31. 75–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1992. Az egyszerű mondat szerkezete [The structure of the simple sentence]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: Mondattan [A structural grammar of Hungarian: Syntax], vol. 11, 79–177. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul D. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1960. On sense and reference. In Peter Geach & Max Black (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 2nd edn., 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Gil, David. 1982. Distributive numerals. Los Angeles: University of California PhD dissertation.
. 2013. Distributive numerals. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Groot, Casper de. 2017. The essives in Hungarian. In Casper de Groot (ed.), Uralic essive and the expression of impermanent state, 325–351. Amsterdam: John Bejnamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gyuris, Beáta. 2002. The semantics of contrastive topics in Hungarian. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University PhD dissertation.
Hegedűs, Veronika & Éva Dékány. 2021. The internal syntax of PPs. In Katalin É. Kiss, Veronika Hegedűs, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver & István Kenesei (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Postpositions and postpositional phrases, 193–250. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
Heusinger, Klaus von. 2002. Reference and representation of pronouns. In Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds.), Pronouns: Representation and grammar, 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas. 2005. Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. The Philosophical Review 1141. 179–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhn, Georg F. K. 2017. Non-possessive person in the nominal domain. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.
2020. The third person gap in adnominal pronoun constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 51. Article 69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Ora Matushansky. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 231. 315–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Cardinals: The syntax and semantics of cardinal-containing expressions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi. 2000. Hungarian. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 29–52. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1989a. Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 121. 559–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989b. Groups, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 121. 723–744. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Predicate-argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites. In Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds.), From NP to DP: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, vol. 11, 211–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Indefinites and the type of sets. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Boolean pragmatics. In Jaap van der Does & C. Dutlih Novaes (eds.), ‘This is not a Festschrift’: A Festschrift for Martin Stokhof. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Lasersohn, Peter. 1995. Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lengyel, Klára. 2000. A melléknév [The adjective]. In Borbála Keszler (ed.), Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar], 142–151. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwartze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and the interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 609–665.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Guiseppe. 2005. Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 241. 5–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maling, Joan M. 1976. Notes on quantifier-postposing. Linguistic Inquiry 71. 708–718.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marácz, László. 1986. Dressed or naked: The case of the PP in Hungarian. In Abraham Werner & Sjaak de Meij (eds.), Topic, focus and configurationality: Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen, 1984, 223–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Why Rose is the Rose: On the use of definite articles in proper names. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 61. 285–308. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
. 2008. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 311. 573–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oravecz, Csaba, Tamás Váradi & Bálint Sass. 2014. The Hungarian Gigaword Corpus. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 1719–1723. Reykjavik: ELRA. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Peredy, Márta. 2010. Nincs van [No copula in 3sg]. In Zsuzsanna Gécseg (ed.), LingDok 9. Nyelvész-doktoranduszok dolgozatai, 145–172. Szeged: JATE Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2005. Pronouns are determiners after all. In Marcel den Dikken & Christina M. Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, 251–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2009. Individuating and measure readings of classifier constructions: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 11. 106–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Numericals: Counting, measuring and classifying. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 161. 527–542. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
. 2017. Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schvarcz, Brigitta R. 2014. The Hungarians who say -nyi: Issues in counting and measuring in Hungarian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University MA thesis.
2022. Nouns, numbers and classifiers in Hungarian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University PhD dissertation.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2011. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), NELS 39: Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 661–678. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharvy, Richard. 1980. A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 891. 607–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass. 2012. Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből [Language technology and cultural heritage, or, corpus building from Old Hungarian codices]. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXIV1. 243–264. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Szőke, Bernadett. 2015. Az értelmezős szerkezetek vizsgálata a magyar nyelvben [Exploring appositive constructions in Hungarian]. Szeged: University of Szeged PhD dissertation.
. 2018. Appositive constructions. In Gábor Alberti & Tibor Laczkó (eds.), Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and Noun Phrases, vol 21, 896–932. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL] (Accessed 14 June 2022)
Tompa, József. 1968. Ungarische Grammatik [Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wohlmuth, Kata. 2019. Atomicity and distributive reference. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra PhD dissertation.
Zweig, Eytan. 2006. Nouns and adjectives in numeral NPs. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), NELS 35: Proceedings ofthe 35th conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 663–675. Amerst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue