Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.34–57

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity

 | University of Virginia
 | University of Melbourne
Published online: 6 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21014.abd
Abstract
This study investigated the role of prompt types in the emotion and lexical complexity level in L2 writing performance using fine-grained automatic textual analyzing tools and indices. Fifty-three ESL advanced-mid students wrote essays on pandemic (esp. COVID-19) and non-pandemic prompts. A textual Sentiment Analysis was carried out to detect both positive and negative emotions expressed in the students’ writing. A set of six lexical complexity indices was calculated to examine further the rarity, fluency, sophistication, and diversity levels in writing. The results revealed that the prompt types affect the emotional and lexical complexity of L2 writing. These results also showed that emotionality and lexical complexity have intricate and significant interactions, providing evidence for an emotion-lexicon link in L2 writing. Our results indicated that emotion has a substantial role in L2 writing beyond the traditional cognition-centered perspective, echoing the call of an ‘affective turn’ in second language acquisition (SLA) research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of literature
    • 2.1Effects of prompts on L2 writing quality and complexity
    • 2.2Effects of prompts on emotion
    • 2.3The role of emotion in SLA and its association with L2 writing
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants and instructional context
    • 3.2Prompts
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Sentiment analysis
    • 3.5Lexical complexity measures
    • 3.6Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Emotion scores
    • 4.2Lexical complexity indices
    • 4.3Emotion-lexicon link
    • 4.4Re-examining lexical complexity with emotion controlled
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality
    • 5.2Effects of prompt types on different facets of lexical complexity in L2 writing
    • 5.3Relationship between emotionality and lexical complexity in L2 writing
    • 5.4Implications, limitations, and future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Writing. Retrieved from [URL]
Balahur, A., Mihalcea, R., & Montoyo, A. (2014). Computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis: Present and envisaged methods and applications. Computer Speech & Language, 28(1), 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2013). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories and praxis. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrillo, L. M., & Moreno, J. L. (2011). Guided use of writing prompts to improve academic writing in college students. Forma y Función, 241, 103–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamcharatsri, P. B. (2012). Emotionality and composition in Thai and English. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, M. (2019). The effects of prompts on L2 writing performance and engagement. Foreign Language Annals, 52(3), 576–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clachar, A. (1999). It’s not just cognition: The effect of emotion on multiple-level discourse processing in second-language writing. Language Sciences, 21(1), 31–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2010). The common European framework of references for languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press. Retrieved from [URL]
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 803–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Mello, S., & Mills, C. (2014). Emotions while writing about emotional and non-emotional topics. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 140–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2018). Editorial. Studies in second language learning and teaching, 8(1), 15–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196(1), 34–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2013). Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 86–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1050–1057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 381, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, L., & Shi, L. (2012). Topical knowledge and ESL writing. Language Testing, 29(3), 443–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2009). The effect of essay prompts and topics on the uses of modal verbs in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 667–683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huh, M.-H., & Lee, J. (2018). Task complexity and writing prompts and performance in EFL high school students’ narrative writing. English Teaching, 73(4), 55–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.12.2) [Computer software]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaur, J., & R. Saini, J. (2014). Emotion detection and sentiment analysis in text corpus: A differential study with informal and formal writing styles. International Journal of Computer Applications, 101(9), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kean, D. K., Glynn, S. M., & Britton, B. K. (1987). Writing Persuasive Documents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 55(2), 95–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoch, U., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2013). A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focused definition for assessment purposes. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 300–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, B., & Reid, J. (1994). Guidelines for designing writing prompts: Clarifications, caveats, and cautions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 231–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for Second / Foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1030–1046. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. (2018). A positive psychology perspective on Chinese students’ emotional intelligence, classroom emotions, and EFL learning achievement. Xiamen: Xiamen University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Gregersen, T. (2012). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., & Vincze, L. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 61–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, C., & D’Mello, S. (2012). Emotions during writing on topics that align or misalign with personal beliefs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 638–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2018). iPad Animations: Powerful Multimodal Practices for Adolescent Literacy and Emotional Language. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(6), 609–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mostafa, T., & Crossley, S. A. (2020). Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 writing quality: Effects of writing tasks and prompts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 491, 100730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortigosa, A., Martín, J. M., & Carro, R. M. (2014). Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 527–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2013). The affective turn in SLA: From ‘affective factors’ to ‘language desire’ and ‘commodification of affect’. In Gabrys-Barker, D. & J. Belska (Eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition (pp. 3–28). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(3), 274–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2019). Elephants in the room: An “affective turn,” or just feeling our way? Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 516–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “Big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rani, S., & Kumar, P. (2017). A sentiment analysis system to improve teaching and learning. Computer, 50(5), 36–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2020). Exploring emotions in language teaching. RELC Journal, 003368822092753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2017). Effects of sound, vocabulary, and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning, 67(3), 665–693. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweinberger, M. (2019). A sociolinguistic analysis of emotives. Corpus Pragmatics, 3(4), 327–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, B., Huang, L., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37(3), 361–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stone, P. J., Bales, R. F., Namenwirth, J. Z., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1962). The general inquirer: A computer system for content analysis and retrieval based on the sentence as a unit of information. Behavioral Science, 7(4), 484–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46(2), 195–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage-based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinson, D., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). How does emotional content affect lexical processing? Cognition and Emotion, 28(4), 737–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2020). Emotion and syntactic complexity in L2 writing: A corpus-based study on Chinese college-level students’ English writing. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–17. Retrieved from [URL]
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, C. J. (2018). The emotional turn in applied linguistics and TESOL: Significance, challenges and prospects. Emotions in Second Language Teaching, 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 281, 53–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, H.-J., & Polio, C. (2016). The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 275–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Putri, Cicilia Deandra Maya & Sumarlin Rengko HR
2025. Motivation, Emotion, and Systemic Factors in Second Language Acquisition: A Narrative Review. Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language 3:3 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Gavin Bui & Yizhou Wang
2024. The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing. Language Teaching Research 28:4 ► pp. 1616 ff. DOI logo
Jung, YeonJoo
2024. Analyzing Sentiment and Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing: A Computational Approach. Modern English Education 25:0 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Mark D. Johnson & Mahsa Farahanynia
2023. Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Examining effects of task complexity and task repetition. Assessing Writing 58 ► pp. 100783 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Xiaofei Lu & Yizhou Wang
2023. The effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in L2 writing: An exploratory study. System 114 ► pp. 103021 ff. DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Xiaofei Lu & Yizhou Wang
2025. Mapping the associations among task complexity, emotionality, and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. Language Awareness 34:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Abdulaziz Alkhalaf, Shatha Ahmed
2022. Expressive writing in a Saudi university English foreign language (EFL) classroom: Evaluating gains in syntactic complexity. F1000Research 11 ► pp. 723 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue