Cover not available

Article published In: Studies of Bilingual Processing Presented to Kenneth I. Forster
Edited by Nan Jiang
[Journal of Second Language Studies 4:2] 2021
► pp. 375–411

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Of revistas and magacínes

Lexical competition in the online processing of established loanwords

 | University of Maryland at College Park, USA
 | The Pennsylvania State University, USA
Published online: 20 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21010.joh
Abstract
The transfer of words from one language to another is ubiquitous in many of the world’s languages. While loanwords have a rich literature in the fields of historical linguistics, language contact, and sociolinguistics, little work has been done examining how loanwords are processed by bilinguals with knowledge of both the source and recipient languages. The present study uses pupillometry to compare the online processing of established loanwords in Puerto Rican Spanish to native Spanish words by highly proficient Puerto Rican Spanish-English bilinguals. Established loanwords elicited a significantly larger pupillary response than native Spanish words, with the pupillary response modulated by both the frequency of the loanword itself and of the native Spanish counterpart. These findings suggest that established loanwords are processed differently than native Spanish words and compete with their native equivalents, potentially due to both intra- and inter-lingual effects of saliency.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1How do loanwords arise?
    • 1.2Loanwords and bilingualism
    • 1.3Using pupillometry
    • 1.4Research questions and hypotheses
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Design
    • 2.4Procedure
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Pre-processing and data cleaning
    • 3.2GAMMs
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Comparing established loanwords and native Spanish words
    • 4.2Frequency effects on the pupillary response
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (90)
References
Adler, R. M., Valdés Kroff, J. R., & Novick, J. M. (2020). Does integrating a code-switch during comprehension engage cognitive control? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 741.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alnæs, D., Sneve, M. H., Espeseth, T., Endestad, T., van de Pavert, S. H. P., & Laeng, B. (2014). Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. Journal of Vision, 14(1), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. The Annual Review of Neuroscience, 281, 403–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attar, N., Schneps, M., & Pomplun, M. (2013). Pupil size as a measure of working memory load during a complex visual search task. Journal of Vision, 131, 160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backus, A. (2012). A usage-based approach to borrowability. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beatty, J., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychonomic Science, 51, 371–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beatty-Martínez, A. L., & Dussias, P. E. (2017). Bilingual experience shapes language processing: Evidence from codeswitching. Journal of Memory and Language, 951, 173–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanco-Elorrieta, E., & Pylkkänen, L. (2017). Bilingual language switching in the lab vs. in the wild: The spatio-temporal dynamics of adaptive language control. Journal of Neuroscience, 371, 9022–9036. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Ecological Validity in Bilingualism Research and the Bilingual Advantage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(12), 1117–1126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boada, R., Sánchez-Casas, R., Gavilán, J. M., Garcia-Albea, J. E., & Tokowicz, N. (2013). Effect of multiple translations and cognate status on translation recognition performance of balanced bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 183–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.09, retrieved from [URL]
Bosma, E., Blom, E., Hoekstra, E., & Versloot, A. (2019). A longitudinal study on the gradual cognate facilitation effect in bilingual children’s Frisian receptive vocabulary. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(4), 371–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. L. (1967). Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature, 2161, 515–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., Morin-Lessard, E., & Lew-Williams, C. (2017). Bilingual infants control their languages as they listen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 9032–9037. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrol, S. E. (1992). On cognates. Second Language Research, 8(2), 93–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Gallés, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2016–). Corpus del Español: Two billion words, 21 countries. Available online at [URL]. (Web / Dialects)
Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology, 48(9), 1203–1207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and language, 41(4), 496–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010). How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and language, 62(3), 284–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 251, 57–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasiolo, M., Nedellec, R., Goude, Y., & Wood, S. N. (2018). Scalable visualisation methods for modern Generalized Additive Models. Arxiv preprint. [URL]
Foote, S. L., & Morrison, J. H. (1987). Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 101, 67–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fricke, M., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2016). Phonetic variation in bilingual speech: A lens for studying the production-comprehension link. Journal of Memory and Language, 891, 110–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabay, S., Pertzov, Y., & Henik, A. (2011). Orienting of attention, pupil size, and the norepinephrine system. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 731, 123–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (2011). Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1171–1181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwartz, L. (2016). Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 857–876. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldwater, B. C. (1972). Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological Bulletin, 771, 340–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(2), 186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1995). A psycholinguistic approach to code-switching: The recognition of guest words by bilinguals. One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching, 259–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasch, M., Ferré, P., & Haro, J. (2017). Pupil dilation is sensitive to the cognate status of words: further evidence for non-selectivity in bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1), 49–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2006). Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is Syntax Separate or Shared between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In M. Haspelmath and U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the World’s Languages (pp. 35–54). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106(1), 501–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1256–1274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johns, M. A., Valdés Kroff, J. R., & Dussias, P. E. (2019). Mixing things up: How blocking and mixing affect the processing of codemixed sentences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 584–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, G. (1995). English loanwords in Japanese. World Englishes, 14(1), 67–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods 42(3), 627–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuchinsky, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., Vaden Jr., K. I., Cute, S. L., Humes, L. E., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2013). Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology, 501, 23–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuitert, S. R. (2013). English Loanwords in Norwegian: A Loanword Processing Study in Young Speakers of Norwegian (Master’s thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim, Norway). Retrieved from: [URL]
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980a). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980b). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11(2), 99–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 3071, 161–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2011). Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 952–965.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Litcofsky, K. A., & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). Switching direction affects switching costs: Behavioral, ERP, and time-frequency analyses of intra-sentential codeswitching. Neuropsychologia, 971, 112–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Makowski, D. (2018). The Psycho Package: An Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(22), 470. Available from [URL].
Morales, A. (2009). Diccionario de anglicismos actuales: fotografía desde la Internet. Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, E. M., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching Languages, Switching Palabras (Words): An Electrophysiological Study of Code Switching. Brain and Language, 801, 188–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2013). Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 709–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling Languages. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, D., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español. Linguistics, 18(7/8), 581–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). What does the Nonce Borrowing Hypothesis hypothesize? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 644–648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Borrowing: Loanwords in the Speech Community and in the Grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Sankoff, M., & Miller, C. (1988). The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics, 261, 47–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
Samuels, E. R., & Szabadi, E. (2008). Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: its role in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part I: principles of functional organisation. Current Neuropharmacology, 61, 235–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., Poplack, S., & Vanniarajan, S. (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 21, 71–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H. J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 1171, 138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidtke, J. (2014). Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Pupillometry in Linguistic Research: An introduction and review for second language researchers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 401, 529–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuster, S., Himmelstoss, N. A., Hutzler, F., Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., & Hawelka, S. (2021). Cloze enough? Hemodynamic effects of predictive processing during natural reading. NeuroImage, 2281, 117–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segui, J., Mehler, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Morton, J. (1982). The word frequency effect and lexical access. Neuropsychologia, 20(6), 615–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sirois, S., & Brisson, J. (2014). Pupillometry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(6), 679–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stammers, J. R., & Deuchar, M. (2012). Testing the nonce borrowing hypothesis: Counter-evidence from English-origin verbs in Welsh. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 630–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamaoka, K. & Miyaoka, Y. (2003). The cognitive processing of Japanese loanwords in katakana. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(2), 69–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12530–12535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2015). Gauging convergence on the ground: Code-switching in the community. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 365–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Bilingualism in the Community: Codeswitching and grammars in contact. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, C. E., Torres Cacoullos, R., & Kidd, E. (2017). Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 283–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological science, 20(8), 923–927. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, R. & Muysken, P. (1994). Modeling lexical borrowability. Language Variation and Change, 61, 39–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rij, J., Hendriks, P., Van Rijn, H., Harald Baayen, R., & Wood, S. N. (2019). Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data. Trends in Hearing, 231, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & Van Rijn, H. (2017). itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs. R package version 2.3Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzel, N., Buttelmann, D., Schieler, A., & Widmann, A. (2016). Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(3), 382–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieling, M. (2018). Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 701, 86–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73(1), 3–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, S. N., Pya, N., & Saefken, B. (2016). Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1111, 1548–1575. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2003). Thin-plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 65(1), 95–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Bogunović, Irena, Bojana Ćoso & Dražen Domijan
2024. Lexical access to unadapted English loanwords in Croatian: Evidence from Croatian speakers with different levels of proficiency in English. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
López-Beltrán, Priscila & Paola E. Dussias
2024. Heritage speakers’ processing of the Spanish subjunctive. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:6 ► pp. 809 ff. DOI logo
Pavlinušić Vilus, Eva, Jasmina Jelčić Čolakovac, Irena Bogunović & Bojana Ćoso
2023. Jutuber, Jutjuber or Yutjuber. Journal for Foreign Languages 15:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Johns, Michael A. & Paola E. Dussias
2022. Comparing Single-Word Insertions and Multi-Word Alternations in Bilingual Speech: Insights from Pupillometry. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue