Cover not available

Article published In: Studies of Bilingual Processing Presented to Kenneth I. Forster
Edited by Nan Jiang
[Journal of Second Language Studies 4:2] 2021
► pp. 204–223

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Why do non-native English speakers show masked form priming when native speakers do not?

 | University of New South Wales, Australia, Australia
 | Zhejiang University City College, China, China
 | University of New South Wales, Australia, Australia
Published online: 6 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21007.taf
Abstract
Native English speakers do not show masked priming effects in lexical decision when a prime word is related to its target purely on the basis of orthographic form (e.g., pillow-PILL, protest-PROTECT). There is strong evidence, however, that non-native English speakers do show such form priming. This paper explores the possible cognitive mechanisms behind this difference between native and non-native speakers. Taft, M., & Li, J. (2020). A new type of masked form priming: Native versus nonnative English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar found that only non-native speakers (with Chinese as their first language) showed priming when the nonword prime ended in the same embedded word as the word target (e.g., plerough-THOROUGH), but a newly reported experiment goes on to show priming for native speakers as well when the shared letter-combination is not itself a word (e.g., celtoise-TORTOISE). This contrast in results leads to the interpretation that native speakers have a specific mechanism for activating embedded words that is important when recognizing polymorphemic words through their stems. It is suggested that non-native speakers, or at least those with Chinese as their first language, do not engage or are slow in engaging such a mechanism. The form priming that they demonstrate arises from facilitated processing of the repeated letters rather than the pre-activation of a lexical representation.
Article outline
  • Masked form priming for native speakers
  • Masked form priming for non-native speakers
  • Explaining L2 form priming
  • Embedded word processing
  • Taft and Li (2020)
  • The experiment
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2014). Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1054–1061. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2016). Embedded stem priming effects in prefixed and suffixed pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 220–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., & Grainger, J. (2017). Support from the morphological family when unembedding the stem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44(1), 135–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ciaccio, L. A., & Clahsen, H. (2020). Variability and consistency in first and second language processing: A masked morphological priming study on prefixation and suffixation. Language Learning, 701, 103–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 641, 344–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 371, 895–908. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finley, A., & Penningroth, S. (2015). Online versus in-lab: Pros and cons of an online prospective memory experiment. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research, vol. 113. pp. 135–162. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 41, 159–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foote, R., Qasem, M., & Trentman, E. (2020). Morphological decomposition in L2 Arabic: A masked priming study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 491, 291–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 101, 680–698.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 241, 498–514.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 671, pp. 285–317). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S. (2016). Masked morphological priming in German-speaking adults and children: Evidence from response time distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 929. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H. (2015). Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 543–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y., Wang, M., & Taft, M. (2015). Morphological decomposition in the recognition of prefixed and suffixed words: Evidence from Korean. Scientific Studies of Reading, 191, 183–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2014). LmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package, version 2.0-3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, J. & Taft, M. (2019). The processing of English prefixed words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, J., Taft, M., & Xu, J. (2017). The processing of English derived words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Language Learning, 671, 858–884. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, M., Jiang, N., & Gor, K. (2017). L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 201, 384–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 558–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 391, 1064–1074.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization. Cognition, 1581, 147–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 111, 245–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1987). Morphographic processing. The BOSS re-emerges. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII1. pp. 265–279. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In A. Pollatsek, & R. Treiman (Eds.) Handbook on Reading. pp. 99–113. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Li, J. (2020). A new type of masked form priming: Native versus nonnative English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., Li, S., & Beyersmann, E. (2018). What cross-morphemic letter transposition in derived nonwords tells us about lexical processing. Journal of Cognition, 11, 36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 921, 14–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 231, 761–775.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Gu, Lei & Wenrui Zhang
2025. The role of phonology in processing English suffixed words by Chinese–English bilinguals. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Koval, Natalie G.
2025. English derived word recognition by Chinese‐English bilinguals: Testing the nature and time course of the component processes. Language Acquisition 32:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Yue, Jinxing, Roelien Bastiaanse, David Howard & Kai Alter
2024. Representational level matters for tone-word recognition: Evidence from form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 77:5 ► pp. 1125 ff. DOI logo
Shen, Lexian, Xiaoguang Li, Shaojuan Huang, Yanhong Huang, Xinyu Gao, Ziqing You, Zirun Mao & Xuemei Tang
2022. Comprehending scientific metaphors in the bilingual brain: Evidence from event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue