Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.114–143
The impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy
A longitudinal classroom-based study of TBLT and PPP
Published online: 9 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20014.har
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20014.har
Abstract
Despite the increasing popularity of task-based language teaching (TBLT) among researchers and teachers, further
classroom-based empirical evidence is needed to support its use over more traditional teaching approaches such as
presentation practice production (PPP). The argument that TBLT is ‘legislation by hypothesis’ (Swan, M. (2005). Legislation
by hypothesis: The case of task based instruction. Applied
Linguistics, 26 (3), 376–401. ), is yet to be completely refuted ( (2018). Reflections
on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.). Four intact classes of Japanese university students
taking a one-year oral English course were randomly assigned to either a TBLT or PPP teaching condition. Speaking proficiency and
speaking self-efficacy were measured three times during the year to discover the differential impact of teaching approach on
growth. Student interviews provided insights into their views on the different approaches. Results showed that students in TBLT
and PPP classes experienced growth in both proficiency and self-efficacy, and there was no difference in final outcomes for the
two conditions. However, patterns of growth for the groups were different.
Keywords: TBLT, PPP, self-efficacy, classroom interaction, speaking
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1TBLT and PPP
- 2.2Teaching approach and language proficiency
- 2.3Self-efficacy
- 2.4Student beliefs
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Operationalization of TBLT and PPP for classroom-based research
- 4.3Measures
- 4.4Analyses
- 5.Results
- 5.1Growth in proficiency
- 5.2Growth in SE
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Proficiency and self-efficacy
- 6.2Students’ beliefs
- 7.Conclusion and limitations
References
References (68)
Anderson, J. (2017). A
potted history of PPP with the help of ELT Journal. ELT
Journal, 71 (2), 218–227.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying
the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human
sciences. Routledge.
Brown, H. D. & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching
by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (4th
ed.). Pearson Education.
Bryfonski, L. & McKay, T. H. (2017). TBLT
implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching
Research, 1–30.
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. H. (1978). The
Acquisition of English Negatives and Interrogatives by Native Spanish
Speakers. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second
Language
Acquisition (pp. 207–230). Newbury House.
Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting
the TBLT versus PPP debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language
Teaching 191, 49–66.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The
significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 51, 161–169.
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond
explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 19 (2), 195–221.
(Ed.). (2007). Practicing
in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive
psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The
psychology of the language learner. Individual differences in second language
acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
(2019). Towards
a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching
Research, 23 (4), 454–475.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Foster, P. (1998). A
Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning, Applied
Linguistics, 19 (1), 1–23.
Ganjouee, A. A., Ghonsooly, B., & Fatemi, A. H. (2018). The
impact of task-based instruction on the enhancement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ speaking skill and emotional
intelligence. Applied Research on English
Language 7(2), 195–214.
Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social
psychological aspect of second language acquisition. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language
and social
psychology (pp. 193–220). Basil Blackwell.
Graham, S. (2007). Learner
strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection. Language
Learning, 35 (1), 81–93.
Graham, S. J. and Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy
instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language
Learning, 58 (4), 747–783.
Graus, J., & Coppen, P. (2016). Student
teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching
Research 20(5), 571–599.
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying
student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin, (Eds.), Learner
strategies in language
learning (pp. 119–129). Prentice Hall.
Leeming, P. (2017). A longitudinal investigation into English speaking self-efficacy in a Japanese language classroom. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 2, (12), 1–18.
Linacre, J. M. (2007a). FACETS:
A computer program for the analysis of multi-faceted data [Computer
software]. MESA.
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (2007). WINSTEPS:
Multiple-choice, rating scale, and partial credit Rasch analysis [Computer
software]. MESA.
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second
language learner’s beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language
Journal 93(1), 91–104.
Long, M. (1985). A
role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language
teaching. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling
and Assessing Second Language
Acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.
(1991). Focus
on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, G. Kees; R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign
language research in cross-cultural
perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
(2016). In
defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
Madarsara, A. M., & Rahimy, R. (2015). Examining
the effect of task complexity and sequence on speaking ability of Iranian EFL
learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and
Literature 4(1), 247–254.
Manalo, E., Koyasu, M., Hashimoto, K., & Miyauchi, T. (2006). Factors
that impact the academic motivation of Japanese students in Japan and in New
Zealand. Psychologia, 491, 114–131.
Matsuura, H., Chiba, R., & Hilderbrandt, P. (2001). Beliefs
and learning and teaching communicative English in Japan. JALT
Journal 23 (1), 69–89.
Mills, N. (2014). Self-efficacy
in second language acquisition. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple
perspectives on the self in
SLA (pp. 6–19). Multilingual Matters.
Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A
reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening
proficiency. Foreign Language
Annals, 39 (2), 276–295.
Mosquera, L. H. (2012). A
research study on task-based language assessment. Revista de Lenguas
Modernas, 161, 215–227.
Nitta, R., & Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A
multifaceted approach to investigating pre-task planning effects on paired oral task
performance. Language
Testing, 31 (2), 147–175.
Norris, J. & L. Ortega. (2000). Effectiveness
of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language
Learning 501, 417–528.
Ockey, G. J., Koyama, D., & Setoguchi, E. (2013). Stakeholder
input and test design: A case study on changing the interlocutor familiarity facet of the group oral discussion
test. Language Assessment
Quarterly, 10 (3), 292–308.
Ooyoung Pyun, D. (2013). Attitudes
towards task-based language learning: A study of college Korean language learners. Foreign
Language
Annals, 46 (1), 108–121.
Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes
in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing
seminar. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational
dynamics in language
learning (pp. 164–194). Multilingual Matters.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How
big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language
Learning 64(4), 878–912.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches
and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination
theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sato, R. (2009). Suggestion
for creating approaches suitable to the Japanese EFL environment. The Language
Teacher, 33 (9), 11–14.
Sato, M., and Loewen, S. (2019). Toward
evidence-based second language pedagogy: Research proposals and pedagogical
recommendations. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based
second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition
studies (pp. 1–24), Routledge.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition
and second language
instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
Schommer, M. (1994). An
emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in
learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs
about text and instruction with
text (pp. 25–55). Erlbaum.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The
idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Multilingual Matters.
Shintani, N. (2015). The
incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for Young Beginner
Learners. TESOL
Quarterly, 49 (1), 115–140.
(2016). Input-based
tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins.
Simon, E., & Taverniers, M. (2011). Advanced
EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning and teaching: A comparison between grammar, pronunciation, and
vocabulary. English
Studies 92(8), 896–922.
Spada, N. & Y. Tomita. (2010). Interactions
between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language
Learning 60(2), 1–46.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation
by hypothesis: The case of task based instruction. Applied
Linguistics, 26 (3), 376–401.
Swanson, P. (2014). The
power of belief: Spanish teachers’ sense of efficacy and student performance on the national Spanish
exams. Hispania, 97 (1), 5–20.
The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A
Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. The Modern Language
Journal, 1001, 19–47.
Cited by (35)
Cited by 35 other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar & Sima Khezrlou
Harris, Justin
Isaacs, Talia & Hamish Chalmers
Leeming, Paul & Justin Harris
Leeming, Paul & Justin Harris
Li, Banban, Phil Hiver, Shiyao Ashlee Zhou & Janice Wu
Musa, Mohd Khirulnizam & Azwin Arif Abdul Rahim
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Quint & Richard M. Ryan
Róg, Tomasz
Róg, Tomasz
Róg, Tomasz
Róg, Tomasz
Wang, Yawen & Peijian Paul Sun
Xu, Jian, Xuyan Qiu & Lei Yang
Chang, Pengyun, Longyu Zhou & Lawrence Jun Zhang
Chen, Liping & Craig Lambert
2024. Focus on form in the uptake, stability and transfer of relative clause use across tasks. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 4:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Istek, Esra & Chinaza Solomon Ironsi
Li, Linghong, Martin Valcke, Linda Badan & Christoph Anderl
Syquia, John & Paul Leeming
Wei, Ran & Xiaoyan Zhao
Yamazaki, Joseph S. & Phil Hiver
Huynh , Truong Sang & Van Loi Nguyen
Jia, Shijiao & Madhubala Bava Harji
Kim, YouJin, Sanghee Kang, Meredith D’Arienzo & Naoko Taguchi
Madonsela, Stanley
Studer, Thomas
Wei, Lin, Xiaoxue Chen, Mingyue Zheng, Li He, Xiaotong Zhang, Yuan Gao, J. Xu, A. Windapo, M.H.A. Hassan & A. Hajiyev
Wen, Ju-May, Hai-Dung Do, Eric Zhi-Feng Liu, Chun-Hung Lin & Shihping Kevin Huang
Xu, Zhiqing, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
Liu, Lingjuan & Kalidoss Rajakani
Moore, Paul J.
Moore, Paul J.
Paul Sun, Peijian & Lawrence Jun Zhang
Rahimi, Siamak & Ehsan Rezvani
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
