Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2022) ► pp.86–113

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Crosslinguistic influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners

ORCiD logo with link | University of Wisconsin Madison
Published online: 6 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20004.cho
Abstract
This paper explores the extent to which L1-Korean L2-English speakers’ L1 influences the computation of conversational implicatures for the definite and demonstrative determiners the and that in English. Both the and that denote unique referents, but that carries implication of contrast (Roberts, C. (2002). Demonstratives as definites. In K. van Deemter & R. Kibble (Eds.) Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation (pp. 89–196). Standford, CA: CSLI Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). Following Submaxim 2 of the Gricean Quantity Maxim, using that instead of unmarked the implicates that the referent is being implicitly contrasted with other members of the same noun. Korean has no equivalent for the and the demonstrative ku ‘that’ is situated on the semantic scale between the and that. This partial overlap could influence L1-Korean L2-English speakers’ implicature computation even though ku also carries implication of contrast. Acceptability judgment data indicate that unlike native speakers, L2 speakers did not show sensitivity to infelicitous use of that, indicating difficulty computing implicatures. Results are discussed in terms of crosslinguistic influence at the semantics-pragmatics interface in L2 acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An implicature-based analysis of the definite and demonstrative determiners
  • 3.Two functions of Korean ku ‘that’: Anaphoric determiner and demonstrative determiner
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Research questions, predictions, and experimental design
    • 4.2Participants and procedures
  • 5.Results
  • 6.General discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Agebjörn, A. (2021). Swedish noun-phrase structure in Russian-speaking learners: An explorative study of L1 influence and input-frequency effects. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 5(1), 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahn, D. (2017). Definite and demonstrative descriptions: A micro-typology. In M. Yoshitaka Erlewine (Ed.), Proceedings of Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) in Asia 2017, 11, 33–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahn, D., & Davidson, K. (2018). Where pointing matters: English and Korean demonstratives. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), Vol. 481.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 435–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 241, 65–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge, Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation, linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 631, 68–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In S. Lowewn & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 224–245). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 251, 657–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, C. (2003). A study of the determiner phrase of Spanish, English and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, S. (1984). Cisiwa coung [Reference and anaphora, written in Korean]. Hangul, 1861, 115–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, S. J. (2009). Nominal structure and interpretation: On the syntax of the Korean Determiner Phrase. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, H. (1999). Interpretation and function of the Korean demonstrative ku. Studies in Modern Grammar, 181, 71–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, J. (2017). The acquisition of different types of definite noun phrases in L2-English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(3), 367–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawley, M. (2007). The R book. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Hoop, H. (2003). On the interpretation of stressed pronouns. In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7 (pp. 159–172). Konstanz, Germany: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Cheylus, A., Déprez, V., van der Henst, J., Jayez, J., Stepanov, R., & Reboul, A. (2019). Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(2), 314–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, K. (1971). Zwei formen des bestimmten artikels. In D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Probleme and fortsschritte der transformationsgrammatik (pp. 159–74). Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in syntax: Vol 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness. London, UK: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 405–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 463–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2012). That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 69–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isard, S. D. (1975). Changing the context In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 287–296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kameyama, M. (1999). Stressed and unstressed pronouns: Complementary preferences. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 306–321). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehler, A., & Ward, G. (2006). Referring expressions and conversational implicature. In B. Birner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 177–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0–33. Retrieved from [URL]
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, D., & Gleason, J. L. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by non-native speakers of English: An analysis of four non-generic uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclaran, R. (1982). The semantics and pragmatics of the English demonstratives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cornell University, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2016). Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. In A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martínez Sanz (Eds) Language acquisition beyond parameters. Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras (pp. 125–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakatani, C. (1993). Accenting on pronouns and proper names in spontaneous narrative. In D. House & P. Touati (Eds.), Proceedings of the European speech communication association workshop on prosody (pp. 164–167). Lund, Sweden: ESCA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (2002). Demonstratives as definites. In K. van Deemter & R. Kibble (Eds.) Information sharing: Reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation (pp. 89–196). Standford, CA: CSLI Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 261, 287–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, F. (2009). Two types of definites in natural language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusettes Amherst, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(10), 534–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120(10), 2444–2462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snape, N. (2008). Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–151). Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. (2019). Using judgments in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprouse, J., Caponigro, I., Greco, C., & Cecchetto, C. (2016). Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(1), 307–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wike, E. L., & Church, J. (1976). Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 151, 249–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Li, Peng & Chengjia Ye
2025. Facilitative L1-transfer in nonnative sound production of monolingual and bilingual learners. Journal of Second Language Studies 8:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yi & Kook-Hee Gil
2024. Second language acquisition of English plurals by Chinese learners. In Current Perspectives on Generative SLA – Processing, Influence, and Interfaces [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 70], ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Min-Joo
2023. Anaphoric definiteness marking in Korean: focusing on subject definites. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Lijuan, Yiyi Lu & Xiaodong Xu
2022. Understanding Temporal Relations in Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Investigation. Brain Sciences 12:4 ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue