Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 4:1 (2021) ► pp.1–18

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Examining L1 influence in L2 word recognition

A case for case

 | The University of Maryland, College Park
Published online: 16 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19039.jia
Abstract
The present study examined L1 influence in visual L2 word recognition in the area of letter case. Whether an English word is displayed in upper- or lower-case letters may be of little significance to English native speakers, but many ESL speakers from east Asia have found it more difficult to recognize words printed in upper-case letters. Two experiments were conducted to explore two questions: (a) whether there was indeed a case effect in L2 word recognition in that ESL speakers took longer in responding to upper-case words, and (b) whether this case effect only occurred for ESL speakers whose first languages employed a script other than the Roman alphabet. The participants included English native speakers, ESL speakers whose L1s employed the Roman alphabet (the Romance ESL group) and ESL speakers whose L1s did not. They were asked to perform a lexical decision task on English words displayed in either upper- or lower-case letters. In both experiments, a reliable case effect was found for the latter ESL group only. This L1-related case effect raised both theoretical and pedagogical issues to be explored in future research.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Experiment 1
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Stimuli
      • Procedures
    • Results and discussion
      • Reaction times
      • Error rates
  • Experiment 2
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Stimuli and design
      • Procedures
    • Results and discussion
      • Reaction times
      • Error rates
  • General discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (38)
References
Allen, P. A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 211, 914–934.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, J. S., & Hutchinson, B. J. (2000). Case-mixing effects on spelling recognition: The importance of test format. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 291, 433–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 102–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Compton, D. L. and Carlisle, J. F. (1994). Speed of word recognition as a distinguishing characteristic of reading disabilities. Educational Psychology Review, 61, 115–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, J. C., & Forster, K. I. (2003). DMDX: a Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language learning, 58(1), 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healy, A. F., & Cunningham, T. F. (1992). A developmental evaluation of the role of word shape in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 201, 141–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 131, 279–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H. (2015). Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 543–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (1999). Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked cross-language priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(1), 59–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Second Language Processing: An Introduction. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive process in second language reading: Transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 41, 133–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Effects of Ll orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 181, 201–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). The use of Ll reading strategies in 1.2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 121, 393–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 109–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 121–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, B. A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from Word Training to Reading in Context: Gains in Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20 (3), 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, B. A., Di Persio, R., Hollingshead, A. (1992). Fluent rereading, repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18(5), 957–971.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maryanne Wolf and Tami Katzir-Cohen. (2001). Reading Fluency and Its Intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 51, 211–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 221, 278–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moats, L. C. (2001). When older students can’t read. Educational Leadership, 58 (6), 36–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, Y. (1998). Effects of First Language and Phonological Accessibility on Kanji Recognition. The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 69–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muljani, D., Koda, K., & Moates, D. R. (1998). The Development of Word Recognition in a Second Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 99–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processingn skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 871, 261–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Geva, E. (1999). The Contribution of Phonological and Orthographic Processing Skills to Adult ESL Reading: Evidence From Native Speakers of Farsi. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(2), 241–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics, 641, 785–794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the Reader. In P. Hagoort & C. Brown (Eds.), Neurocognition of language processing (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 671, 461–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portin, M. & Laine, M. (2001). Processing cost associated with infl ectional morphology in bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 55–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Harrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2008). L1effects on the processing of infl ected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 1281, 452–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2007). Processing of infl ected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 135–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V. (2000). Speed does matter in reading. The Reading Teacher, 541, 146–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 11(2), 245–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vainio, S., Pajunen, A., & Hyönä, J. (2014). L1 and L2 word recognition in Finnish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 133–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wade-Woolley, L. (1999). First language influences on second language word reading: All roads lead to Rome. Language Learning, 49(3), 447–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55(1), 71–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and Nonalphabetic L1 Effects in English Word Identification: A Comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 Learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jia, Ruirui & Nan Jiang
2025. Examining strength of L2 form-meaning connection: A study of intralingual L2 semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xueni, Binghan Zheng & Yan Jing Wu
2025. Cross-language interactions during concurrent comprehension and production: evidence from simultaneous interpreters. Applied Psycholinguistics 46 DOI logo
Zhang, Yong, Ziqian Yu, Jieyang Yu, Qianyu Ye & Yan Jing Wu
2025. Within- and cross-language semantic effects on oral word translation with a word flanker paradigm. Language and Cognition 17 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue