Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 4:1 (2021) ► pp.96–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Developing “conceptual knowledge” descriptors for CEFR-based proficiency levels

 | University of Thessaly
Published online: 16 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19029.gal
Abstract
This article proposes a framework for the integration of “conceptual knowledge” descriptors’ into CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for languages)-based proficiency levels. Research on the difficulties faced by second language (L2) learners when learning an additional language has shown that apart from the pure linguistic and communicative errors, a further type of error, namely conceptual errors hinders communication in the target language. Conceptual errors are a manifestation of ill-developed conceptual knowledge, that is the ability to express oneself in an L2 while using the L2 conceptual system. Although there exists a number of studies linking conceptual knowledge and its constituent parts to native-like fluency, relatively little is present in the CEFR. Hence, the goal of this paper is twofold, first to introduce and clarify “conceptual knowledge” and second (and most importantly) to develop conceptual knowledge descriptors’ and sample activities for each CEFR level ranging from A2 to C2.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conceptual knowledge (and/or mastery)
  • 3.The CEFR and the conceptual knowledge
  • 4.Developing conceptual knowledge descriptors for the CEFR levels
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions and teaching implications
  • Note
  • References
References (71)
References
Allen, E., Bernhardt, E., Berry, M. T., & Demel, M. (1988). Comprehension and text genre: An analysis of secondary school foreign language readers. Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 163–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreou, G., & Galantomos, I. (2008). Designing a conceptual syllabus for teaching metaphors and idioms in a foreign language context. Porta Linguarum, 91, 69–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berardo, S. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F. (1999). Learning Vocabulary Through Metaphor Awareness. Études et Travaux, 31, 53–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesising about their origin. Prospect, 16(3), 35–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Applied Linguistics Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Variation in Conceptual Metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol, 18(4), 231–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Expanding Learners’ Vocabulary Through Metaphoric Awareness: What Expansion, What Learners, What Vocabulary? In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 211–232). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (2001). Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT Journal, 55(3), 255–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: rationale, proposals, and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & Fr. Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 305–355). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Cross-cultural Variation as a Variable in Comprehending and Remembering Figurative Idioms. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 375–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: more than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 111, 43–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambridge Essential English Dictionary (2011). (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B. (2015). Idiom Acquisition and Processing by Second/Foreign Language Learners. In R. H. Heredia & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual Figurative Language Processing (pp. 208–244). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (1995). Learning and teaching languages: the role of “conceptual fluency”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 3–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Second Language Teaching: A View from the Right Side of the Brain. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Conceptual Fluency in Second Language Teaching: An Overview of Problems, Issues, Research Findings, and Pedagogy. International journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(1), 145–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, M., & Grieve, K. (2010). Conceptual Error Theory and the Teaching of Italian. ITALICA, 87(1), 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill Acquisition Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 94–112). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denroche, Ch. (2015). Metonymy and Language. A New Theory of Linguistic Processing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & O’ Brien, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 361, 35–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérez Pérez, R. G. (2017). Teaching Conceptual Metaphors to EFL Learners in the European Space of Higher Education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(1), 87–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R. (1983). Recent research on metaphor. Semiotic Inquiry, 31, 35–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2000). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances in L2. Links & Letters, 71, 145–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I., & Papp, T. (2000). Metaphorical competence in trilingual language production. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 99–120). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). How to Demonstrate the Conceptual Effect of L2 on L1? Methods and Techniques. In V. Cook (Ed.), Effect of the Second Language on the First (pp. 247–265). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In M. Koponen & H. Riggenbach (Eds.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5–24). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 321, 145–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A Practical introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1986). The meanings of Literal. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1(4), 291–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The Contemporary Theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lattey, E. (1986). Pragmatic classification of idioms as an aid for the language learner. IRAL, 241, 217–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, G. (2003). Meanings and Metaphors. Activities to practice figurative language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levorato, M. C. (1993). The acquisition of idioms and the development of figurative competence. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation (pp. 101–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: the role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 191, 415–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The Effects of Different Tasks on the Comprehension and Production of Idioms in Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 601, 261–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liontas, J. (2015). Developing Idiomatic Competence in the ESOL Classroom: A Pragmatic Account. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 621–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Little, D., Devitt, S., & Singleton, D. (1989). Learning Foreign Languages from Authentic Texts: Theory and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric Competence: A Language Learning Strength of Students With a Holistic Cognitive Style? TESOL QUARTERLY, 35(3), 459–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006a). Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006b). Metaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., & Turner, S. (2014). An Investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, D. (2008). Idioms. Description, Comprehension, Acquisition, and Pedagogy. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2015). (6th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacArthur, F., & Littlemore, J. (2008). A discovery approach to figurative language learning with the use of corpora. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 159–188). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, L. (2003). Developing listening skills with authentic materials. ESL Magazine, 6(1), 16–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 171, 465–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (1996). Bilingualism and cognition: Concepts in the mental lexicon. In A. Pavlenko & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism) (pp. 49–85). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O. (2004). Contextual Strength: the Whens and Hows of Context Effects. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental Pragmatics (pp. 172–186). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollio, R. H., Barlow, J. M., Fine, H. J., & Pollio, M. R. (1977). Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy and education. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, M. R., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why Do People Use Figurative Language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, A. (2002). Teaching Adults (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 237–257). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valeva, G. (1996). On the Notion of Conceptual Fluency in a Second Language. In A. Pavlenko & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism) (pp. 22–38). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanpatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2015). Key Terms in Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yorio, C. A. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism Across the Lifespan. Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and loss (pp. 55–72). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Epsimari, Chrysi & Anna Mouti
2022. Conceptual metaphors, plurilingualism and second language acquisition: a refugee education case study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:8 ► pp. 2853 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue