Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2020) ► pp.55–81

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The role of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in second language listening comprehension

 | Columbia University
Published online: 10 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19012.vaf
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to examine the extent by which second language breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge (BVK and DVK, respectively) were predictors of successful listening comprehension. To this end, along with a standardized test of listening comprehension ability, aural measures of both BVK and DVK were administered to 262 English learners within a wide range of proficiency level. The data were subjected to structural equation modeling, and the results showed that BVK and DVK were not measured in a psychometrically distinct way in the current study. This did not allow any conclusions about the relative contribution of BVK and DVK to listening ability at the construct level. However, at the measured-variable level, the findings showed that the DVK test scores were better predictors of success in listening comprehension than the ones from the BVK test.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Measuring L2 vocabulary knowledge
    • 2.2The role of vocabulary knowledge in L2 listening
  • 3.The current study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instruments
      • 3.2.1Listening comprehension test
      • 3.2.2Vocabulary Knowledge Measures
        • 3.2.2.1Aural vocabulary size test (AVST)
        • 3.2.2.2Aural vocabulary depth test (AVDT)
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Reliability estimates and descriptive statistics
    • 4.2Correlation and confirmatory factor analyses
    • 4.3Regression analysis and structural equation modeling
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (41)
References
Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 27(1), 101–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International journal of listening, 14(1), 14–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henning, G. (1992). Dimensionality and construct validity of language tests. Language Testing, 9(1), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 181, 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D. (2015). The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 741–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1996a). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Competence and performance in language learning (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied, 11(2), 323–348.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 57–78). Eurosla Monographs Series, 21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, M. Torreblanca-López, & M. López-Jiménez (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, 55(4), 174–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 (2), 282–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language learning, 52(3), 513–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 211, 28–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in Language Assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language testing, 10(3), 355–371.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). 7. Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 241, 146–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. IJES, International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 105–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Teaching and researching: Listening. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language testing, 18(1), 55–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stæhr, L. S. (2007). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of reading, listening and writing. Language Learning Journal, 361, 139–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31 (04), 577–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swank, J. M., & Mullen, P. R. (2017). Evaluating evidence for conceptually related constructs using bivariate correlations. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 270–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., Gustafson, J. M., & Martin-Lof, P. (2014). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 81: 370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue