Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.71–92

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Lexical complexity of academic presentations

Similarities despite situational differences

 | Old Dominion University
Published online: 18 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.18003.zar
Abstract
The present study examined the lexical complexity profiles of academic presentations of three groups of university students (N = 93) – native English speaking, English as a second language, and English as a lingua franca users. It adopted a notion of lexical complexity which includes lexical diversity, lexical density, and lexical sophistication as main dimensions of the framework. The study aimed at finding out how the three academically similar groups of presenters compared on their lexical complexity choices, what the lexical complexity profiles of high quality students’ academic presentations looked like, and whether we can identify variables that contribute to the overall lexical complexity of presentations given by each group in a unique way. The findings revealed overwhelming similarities across the three groups of presenters and also suggested that the three dimensional framework provides a holistic picture of the lexical complexity for various groups of English for academic purposes presenters.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Perspectives on the EALF user
  • 3.Lexical complexity: Operationalization and measurement
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Data
    • 4.3Data analysis criteria
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
References (32)
References
Brown, D. H. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2002). Web VocabProfile (v. 3 Classic). <[URL]> (18 February 2018).
Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 197–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Education at a Glance. (2016). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. <[URL]> (18 February 2018).
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Institute of International Education (Open Doors, 2017). <[URL]> (18 February 2018).
Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Accommodating (to) ELF in the international university. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 926–936. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). English as a lingua franca in the international university: The politics of academic English language policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kao, S., & Wang, W. (2014). Lexical and organizational features in novice and experienced ELF presentations. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(1), 49–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N., & Ranta, E. (2010). English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes, 291,183–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, P. M. (2001). Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD) (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Memphis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 241, 459–488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 421, 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P. & Bell, H. (2001). ‘P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of teaching English as a second language trainees. System, 321, 75–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prodromou, L. (2008). English as a lingua franca: A corpus-based analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J., Parslow, P., & Williams, S. (2018). Back to basics: How measures of lexical diversity can help discriminate between CEFR levels. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 302–327.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register variation. In G. E. Perren & J. I. M. Trim (Eds.), Application of linguistics: Selected papers of the Second International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge (pp. 443–452). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermeer, A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 171, 65–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zareva, A. (2009a). Informational packaging, level of formality, and the use of circumstance adverbials in L1 and L2 student academic presentations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 81, 55–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Lexical composition of effective L1 and L2 student academic presentations. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 91–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Zhiyun Huang
2025. Investigating the impacts of task types on the CALF of L2 written production: the moderating role of L2 writing selves. Reading and Writing DOI logo
Jiang, Yuyu & Hua Chen
2025. Validating a Multi-Dimensional Rating Scale for Lexical Proficiency in L2 Academic Speech: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Sage Open 15:3 DOI logo
Wu, Jiayi, Hongzhong Chen & Lang Chen
2025. The impact of research paradigms on encoding and decoding difficulties of applied linguistics articles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Apridayani, Aisah, Abdul Kamaruddin, Nootchanat Sukkaew & Maheswaran S.
2024. Challenges and Issues in English Presentation Through Synchronous Online Conference Platforms in Higher Education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2024:1 DOI logo
Liu, Qiucheng
2023. Text Complexity Analysis of Chinese and foreign academic English writing via mobile devices based on neural network and deep learning. Library Hi Tech 41:5 ► pp. 1317 ff. DOI logo
Dinh, Hanh
2022. Synergic Concepts, Lexical Idiosyncrasies, and Lexical Complexities in Bilingual Students’ Translated Texts as Efforts to Resolve Conceptual Inequivalences. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Memari, Zainab
2021. 2021 Sustainable Leadership and Academic Excellence International Conference (SLAE), ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Zareva, Alla
2019. Providing feedback on the lexical use of ESP students’ academic presentations: teacher training considerations. In ESP teaching and teacher education: current theories and practices, ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Zareva, Alla
2020. Introduction: Why Looking into Student Academic Presentations?. In Speech Accommodation in Student Presentations, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zareva, Alla
2020. Lexical Profiles of Student Academic Presentations. In Speech Accommodation in Student Presentations, ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Zareva, Alla
2021. Oral Academic Genres and Features of Student Academic Presentations. In Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics [Springer Texts in Education, ], ► pp. 487 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue