Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.45–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Enacting voices

An analysis on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of heteroglossic speech

 | University of Minnesota
Published online: 18 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17027.las
Abstract
The present study supports the idea of heteroglossia and its contributions to language learning in second language acquisition (SLA) theory and bilingualism. Bakhtin’s (Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays, M. Holquist (Ed.). (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1934)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) theory of heteroglossia differs from variety and register in that when acquiring a language, one internalizes the voices of others. Viewing interlanguage through a heteroglossic lens, it is possible that these voices in heteroglossia may have an effect on second language (L2) users’ language production. By blending sociolinguistic and sociocultural frameworks, this study analyzed the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of two French-English bilinguals’ narratives. Findings demonstrate a clear shift in all three measures of the CAF framework when participants enacted the voice of a perceived interlocutor or perceived self, versus when they recounted a narrative. These findings support the notion that an individual may have variable linguistic systems, and raise other important theoretical and practical implications for SLA research and L2 instruction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Data collection
    • 2.3Data analysis
    • 2.4Measuring complexity
    • 2.5Measuring accuracy
    • 2.6Measuring fluency
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Accuracy
    • 3.2Fluency
    • 3.3Complexity
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays, M. Holquist (Ed.). (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1934)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Tarone, E. (2011). Variationist perspectives. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 41–56). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style-shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 301, 433–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 131, 145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broner, M. (2001). Impact of interlocutor and task on first and second language use in a Spanish immersion program. CARLA Working Paper, 181. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corder, S. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL, 5(4), 161–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 299–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G. (2016). Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 98–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Long, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorsuch, G., Meyers, C., Pickering, L., & Griffee, D. (2013). For ITAs: Techniques for improving discourse intonation. In English communication for international teaching assistants (2nd ed., pp. 167–74). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kvernbekk, T. (2003). On identifying narratives. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 221, 267–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Beckett, T. (2009). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42(4), 459–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., Thorne, S., & Poehner, M. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 207–26). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaScotte, D. (2016). ‘So please be nice in class!’: An analysis of the complexity, accuracy and fluency of two English learners’ language through a heteroglossic lens (Unpublished M.A. qualifying paper). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. <[URL]> (10 September 2018).
LaScotte, D., & Tarone, E. (2019). Heteroglossia and constructed dialogue in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 1031(Supplement 2019), 95–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 401, 387–417.
Long, M. (1998). SLA: Breaking the siege. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 171, 79–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathis, T., & Yule, G. (1994). Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 181, 63–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyers, C. (2013). Mirroring project update: Intelligible accented speakers as pronunciation models. TESOL Video News: The Newsletter of the Video and Digital Media Interest Sections. <[URL]>
Moreno, L. (2016). Channeling Charlie: Suprasegmental pronunciation in a second language learner’s performance of others’ voices (Unpublished M.A. qualifying paper). University of Minnesota. <[URL]> (10 September 2018).
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 101, 209–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selinker, L., & Douglas, D. (1985). Wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Applied Linguistics, 61, 190–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 491, 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning, 291, 181–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 41, 142–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000a). Still wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 201, 182–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Getting serious about language play: Language play, interlanguage variation and second language acquisition. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. Klee & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in SLA: Proceedings of the 1999 second language research forum (pp. 31–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E., & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation and SLA theory. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 107–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–88). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1984). Language production in foreign and native languages: Same or different? In H. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.) Second language productions (pp. 11–25). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1993). Reported discourse in contemporary English. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 26–27, 17–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

LaScotte, Darren K.
2022. L2 Voices and Materials as Tools in Pronunciation Pedagogy. In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
LASCOTTE, DARREN K. & ELAINE TARONE
2022. Channeling Voices to Improve L2 English Intelligibility. The Modern Language Journal 106:4 ► pp. 744 ff. DOI logo
LaScotte, Darren, Colleen Meyers & Elaine Tarone
2021. Voice and Mirroring in SLA: Top-Down Pedagogy for L2 Pronunciation Instruction. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
LaSCOTTE, DARREN & ELAINE TARONE
2019. Heteroglossia and Constructed Dialogue in SLA. The Modern Language Journal 103:S1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue