Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.79–105

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Effects of second language proficiency and working memory span on novel language learning

 | University of Arizona
 | University of Arizona
Published online: 7 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17025.zav
Abstract
In this paper we examine the effects of prior language learning experience and working memory capacity on learning a novel language. Participants with a range of proficiency in a second language were trained on a third language. They were presented with 20 Turkish words (to test word-learning) and their plural counterparts (to test rule-learning). After training, participants were asked to judge whether a given label correctly matched the pictured object (comprehension) and to verbally produce the correct label for a given object (production). The comprehension test took place immediately after training and again a week later. The production test was administered after the second comprehension test. We found that performance on the initial comprehension test was predicted by working memory span but not L2 proficiency; L2 proficiency predicted learning performance only for the delayed tests. This suggests that the two variables – L2 Proficiency and Working Memory – play different roles in L3 learning.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Bilingualism and L3 learning
  • Working memory and learning
  • Bilingualism and working memory
  • The present study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials and procedures
      • Measures of learner characteristics
        • Proficiency tests
        • Working memory test
      • Language learning task
        • Training
      • Language learning measures
        • Immediate comprehension test
        • Additional comprehension test
        • Delayed comprehension test
        • Production test
  • Results
    • Measures of learner characteristics
    • Correlations between learner characteristics and language learning tests
      • Number of trainings
      • Comprehension tests and production tests
      • Vocabulary learning
        • Immediate comprehension test
        • Delayed comprehension test
        • Production test
      • Rule learning
        • Immediate comprehension test
        • Delayed comprehension test
        • Production test
      • Session 1 vs. session 2
      • Singular and plural forms
  • Discussion
    • Word learning
  • Rule learning
  • Comprehension vs. production
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). Testing the interdependence hypothesis among native adult bilingual Russian-English students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4), 437–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., & Sanitsky, E. (2010). Advantages of bilinguals over monolinguals in learning a third language. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 33(2), 173–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akamatsu, N. (2008). The effects of training on automatization of word recognition in English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 175–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M. & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 683–695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 191, 537–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 586–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as language learning device. Psychological Review, 1051, 158–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 321, 1341–1354.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching¸46, 71–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 151, 195–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craik, F. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive abilities (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 351, 116–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gathercole, S., & Masoura, E. (2003). Contrasting contributions of phonological short-term memory and long-term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign language. Memory, 12(3–4), 422–429.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Thomas, E. M., Kennedy, I., Prys, C., Young, N., Viñas-Guasch, N., Roberts, E. J., Hughes, E. K., & Jones, L. (2014). Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(11), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., & Meschyan, G. (2006). Executive function is necessary to enhance lexical processing in a less proficient L2: Evidence from fMRI during picture naming. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 9(2), 177–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 625–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 705–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keshavarz, M. H. & Astaneh, H. (2004). The impact of bilinguality on the learning of English vocabulary as a foreign language (L3). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 295–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., Stafford, C., & Sanz, C. (2017). Two birds, one stone, or how learning a foreign language makes you a better language learner. Hispania, 100(3), 361–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2011). Working memory predicts the acquisition of explicit L2 knowledge. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism (pp. 101–114). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, K., & Ellis, N. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 379–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Novices and experts: An information processing approach to the “good language learner” problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 71, 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Language‐learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language learning, 40(2), 221–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive psychology, 66(2), 232–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48(1), 98–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papagno, G., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 331–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 253–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratiu, I. & Azuma, T. (2015). Working memory capacity: Is there a bilingual advantage? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 331, 217–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 211, 23–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45(1), 21–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soveri, A., Laine, M., Hamalainen, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2011). Bilingual advantage in attentional control: Evidence from the forced-attention dichotic listening paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 371–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 293–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stafford, C. (2011). Bilingualism and enhanced attention in early adulthood. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(1), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1988). The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9(3), 235–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallar, G. & Papagno, C. (2002). Neuropsychological impairments of verbal short-term memory. In A. D. Baddeley, M. D. Kopelman, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), The handbook of memory disorders (2nd ed.; pp. 249–270). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Candia Mahn, A. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experience and inexperienced learners. Language learning, 47(3), 507–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinbach, N., & Henik, A. (2012). Temporal orienting and alerting – same or different? Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1–3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2011). Working memory and SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427–441). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, H., Yang, S., Ceci, S., & Wang, Q. (2005). Effects of bilinguals’ controlled-attention on working memory and recognition. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 2401–2404). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue