Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 7:1 (2024) ► pp.44–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The role of complexity in the ability to notice incoherent uses of connectives for L2

 | University of Bern, Switzerland
 | University of Bern, Switzerland
 | University of Fribourg, Switzerland
Published online: 9 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00025.wet
Abstract
When learning a second language, some connectives are more difficult to acquire and to master than others. While previous research has assessed different factors responsible for this difficulty by using offline tasks, little is known about the extent to which L2-readers are sensitive to different connectives while reading. In our study, we compared self-paced reading times of native and non-native speakers of French for sentences that were correctly or incorrectly marked with either the infrequent connective cependant (‘however’) or the more frequent mais (‘but’). Results showed that incorrect uses only produced longer reading times when mais was used. Yet, in a sentence-evaluation-task using the same set of sentences, L2-speakers were able to discriminate incorrectly marked sentences with cependant from correctly marked ones. We conclude that a good theoretical understanding of connectives for L2 (Experiment 2) does not always warrant a quick activation of their meaning while reading (Experiment 1).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The mastery of connectives in a second language
  • 3.Spotting incorrect uses of connectives while reading in a second language
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1Experiment 1: Self-paced reading task
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Method and design
      • 4.1.3Results
        • 4.1.3.1Non-native readers
        • 4.1.3.2Native readers
      • 4.1.4Discussion
    • 4.2Experiment 2: Sentence evaluation task
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Method and design
      • 4.2.3Results
        • Supplementary measurements
      • 4.2.4Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Competing interests
  • Ethical statement
  • Notes
  • References
References (59)
References
Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agudo, J. de D. M. (2017). Native and Non-Native Teachers in English Language Classrooms: Professional Challenges and Teacher Education. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, B., & Tapper, M. (1998). The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In Learner English on Computer. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (2014). So, Transitions: Linking Adverbial Use of University ESL Students. CATESOL Journal, 26(1), 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. arXiv:1406.5823 [Stat]. [URL]
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers (Vol. 991). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benzitoun, C., Debaisieux, J.-M., & Deulofeu, H.-J. (2016). Le projet ORFÉO: Un corpus d’étude pour le français contemporain. Corpus, 151, Article 15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2013). Lextale_FR a fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 53(1), Article 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caron, J., Micko, H. C., & Thüring, M. (1988). Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentences. Journal of memory and language, 27(3), 309–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, P.-J. (2014). Learners’ Use of English Adverbial Connectors in Academic. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christofalos, A. L., Raney, G. E., Daniel, F., & Demos, A. P. (2020). Titles support the development of coherent situation models. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 417–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 564–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crewe, W. J. (1990). The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal, 44(4), 316–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crible, L., & Pickering, M. J. (2020). Compensating for processing difficulty in discourse: Effect of parallelism in contrastive relations. Discourse Processes, 57(10), 862–879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crible, L. (2021). Negation Cancels Discourse-Level Processing Differences: Evidence from Reading Times in Concession and Result Relations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crosson, A. C., Lesaux, N. K., & Martiniello, M. (2008). Factors that influence comprehension of connectives among language minority children from Spanish-speaking backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 603–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 151. 739–757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, L., & Hadermann, P. (2009). Structure narrative et connecteurs temporels en français langue seconde. In Eva Havu, Juhani Härmä, Mervi Helkkula, Meri Larjavaara et Ulla Tuomarla (eds). La langue en contexte. Actes du colloque « Représentations du sens linguistique IV », Helsinki 28–30 mai 2008. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 19–34
Ellis, R. (2006). Modelling Learning Difficulty and Second Language Proficiency: The Differential Contributions of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 431–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Implicit and Explicit Learning, Knowledge and Instruction. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, Y., & Yip, O. Y. L. M. (1992). A Comparison of Internal Conjunctive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English. RELC Journal, 23(1), 15–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1998). Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. In A. H. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse Markers. Description and Theory (pp. 301–326). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). An R Companion to Applied Regression. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15(1), 17–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ha, M. (2016). Linking Adverbials in First-Year Korean University EFL Learners’ Writing: A Corpus-Informed Analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning: An International Journal, 29(6), 1090–1101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartnett. (1986). Static and dynamic cohesion: Signals of thinking in writing. Functional Approaches to Writing. Research Perspectives, London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanno, Y. (1989). The Use of Connectives in English Academic Papers Written by Japanese Students. MITA Working Papers in Psycholinguistics, Volume 2, Volume 2. [URL]
Lambda-l Group (1975). Car, parce que, puisque. Revue Romane 101, 248–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leedham, M., & Cai, G. (2013). Besides … on the other hand: Using a corpus approach to explore the influence of teaching materials on Chinese students’ use of linking adverbials. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 374–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyu, S., Tu, J.-Y., & Lin, C.-J. C. (2020). Processing Plausibility in Concessive and Causal Relations: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Eye-Tracking. Discourse Processes, 57(4), 320–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin-Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 273–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. C. P., & Tsang, E. S.-C. (1993). A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohamed, N. (2016). Use of conjunctions in argumentative essay by ESL undergraduates. E-Academia Journal, 5(1), Article 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M., Schwarz, I., & Undlin, R. (1992). Use and Understanding of Adverbial Conjuncts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(1), 108–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 501–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Recio Fernández, I. M. (2020). The Impact of Procedural Meaning on Second Language Processing: A Study on Connectives [Dissertation].
Roze, C., Danlos, L., & Muller, P. (2012). LEXCONN: A French Lexicon of Discourse Connectives. Discours. Revue de Linguistique, Psycholinguistique et Informatique. A Journal of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics, 101, Article 10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreiber-Gregory, D. N. (2018). Ridge Regression and multicollinearity: An in-depth review. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 13(4), 359–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, J. (2017). A corpus-based study of contrastive/concessive linking adverbials in spoken English of Chinese EFL learners. Studies in Literature and Language, 14(2), 17–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spyridakis, J. H., & Standal, T. C. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 285–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tapper, M. (2005). Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners’ written English–preliminary results. The Department of English: Working Papers in English Linguistics, 51, 116–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P. (2019). Chapter 2. Automaticity, fluency and second language task performance. In Z. (Edward) Wen & M. J. Ahmadian (Eds.), Task-Based Language Teaching (Vol. 131, pp. 39–52). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. (2005). Connecteurs pragmatiques, inférences directionnelles et représentations mentales. Cahiers Chronos, 121, 35–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Silfhout, G. van, Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2014). Establishing coherence in schoolbook texts: How connectives and layout affect students’ text comprehension. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzel, M., Zufferey, S., & Gygax, P. (2020). Second Language Acquisition and the Mastery of Discourse Connectives: Assessing the Factors That Hinder L2-Learners from Mastering French Connectives. Languages, 5(3), Article 3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzel, M., Crible, L., & Zufferey, S. (2022). Processing clause-internal discourse relations in a second language: A case study of specifications in German and French. Journal of second language studies, 5(2), 206–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzel, M., Zufferey, S., & Gygax, P. (2022a). Do non-native readers rely on connectives? The processing of coherence relations in L2. In M.-J. Cuenca & L. Degand (Eds.), Discourse Markers in Interaction (pp. 89–119). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022b). How Robust Is Discourse Processing for Native Readers? The Role of Connectives and the Coherence Relations They Convey. Frontiers in Psychology, 131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzel, M., Tskhovrebova, E., Gygax, P. M., & Zufferey, S. (2023). Pragmatic and syntactic constraints on French causal connectives: An evaluation of native and non-native speakers’ sensitivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 2091, 89–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1983). Teaching those missing links in writing1. ELT Journal, 37(1), 22–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, S. (2014). Givenness, procedural meaning and connectives. The case of French puisque. Journal of Pragmatics, 621, 121–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, S., Mak, W., Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2015). Advanced learners’ comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. Second Language Research, 31(3), 389–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, S., & Gygax, P. M. (2017). Processing Connectives with a Complex Form-Function Mapping in L2: The Case of French “En Effet.” Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, S., & Gygax, P. (2020). “Roger Broke His Tooth. <However>, He Went to the Dentist”: Why Some Readers Struggle to Evaluate Wrong (and Right) Uses of Connectives. Discourse Processes, 57(2), 184–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wang, Tianyue, Lijie Liu & Xiaodong Xu
2025. A nurse should not be careless: processing presupposed meanings triggered by connectives. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 40:3 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue