Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 7:1 (2024) ► pp.129–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The detriment that error production creates is affected by non-L1 speakers’ linguistic group membership

 | University of the West of England, UK
 | University of the West of England, UK
 | University of the West of England, UK
 | University of the West of England, UK
Published online: 6 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00020.kir
Abstract
We present three studies that investigate the effect of group-level language ability expectations on language ability judgements. Study 1 identifies expected English-language ability levels that native English speakers’ have for a number of non-native English-speaker groups. Based on the results, two text-based written-guise studies were conducted investigating the level of detriment that grammatical and lexical/typographical errors created on English-language ability ratings for different author guises (Swedish, Chinese, English) in formal (Study 2) and informal contexts (Study 3). In both contexts, grammatical errors produced by the guise representing the lower-ability non-L1 group were overlooked, while the same errors produced by the other guises significantly lowered the ability ratings. Our results coincide with the idea of the ‘sympathetic native speaker’ and expand it, suggesting that expected language level based on linguistic group membership inversely affects the level of sympathy/tolerance demonstrated. We link this to possible pedagogical implications.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Errors
      • 1.1.1Native speakers
      • 1.1.2Non-L1 speakers
      • 1.1.3Errors in written texts
    • 1.2Personal names and group membership
    • 1.3Sympathetic Native Speaker
  • 2.The present study
    • 2.1On the selection of judges
  • 3.Study 1 – native speaker’s expectation of non-L1 speaker’s English language ability
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Results and discussion
  • 4.Study 2 – judgements of errors in a formal text
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Respondents (Judges)
      • 4.1.2Texts used
      • 4.1.3The Guises, i.e., the linguistic background of the writer of the text
      • 4.1.4Questionnaire
      • 4.1.5Procedure
      • 4.1.6Coding
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Study 3 – judgement of errors in an informal text
    • 5.1Method
      • 5.1.1Respondents (judges)
      • 5.1.2Materials
      • 5.1.3Coding
    • 5.2Results
  • 6.General discussion
    • 6.1Why the different error judgements for Swedish/English and Chinese speakers?
    • 6.2The effect of different error types
    • 6.3Detriment of errors in formal and informal texts
    • 6.4Implications of the current study in L2 pedagogical settings
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Ambridge, B., et al. (2020). The crosslinguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgements from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew, and K’iche’. Cognition, 2021, 104310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Appelman, A., & Schmierbach, M. (2018). Make no mistake? Exploring cognitive and perceptual effects of grammatical errors in news articles. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 951, 930–947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayhan, Ü. & Uğur Türkyılmaz, M. (2015). Key of language assessment: Rubrics and rubric design. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 21, 82–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication, 531, 33–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bender, E. M. (2005). On the boundaries of linguistic competence: Matched-guise experiments as evidence of knowledge of grammar. Lingua, 1151, 1579–1598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1986). Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child development, 571, 498–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birkelund, G. E., Rogstad, J., Heggebø, K., Aspøy, T. M. and Bjelland, H. F. (2014). ‘Diskriminering i arbeidslivet – Resultater fra randomiserte felteksperiment i Oslo, Stavanger, Bergen og Trondheim’, Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 221, 352–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandenburg, L. C. (2015). Testing the recognition and perception of errors in context. Business and Professional Communication, 781, 74–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cargile, A. C. (1997). Attitudes towards Chinese-accented speech: An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 161, 434–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpusor, A. G. & Loges, W. E. (2006). Rental discrimination and ethinicity in names. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 361, 934–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotton, J., O’Neill, B. S., & Griffin, A. (2008). The “Name Game”: Affective and hiring reactions to first names. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 231, 18–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework for Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 281, 604–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, E. E. (1983). Error evaluation: The importance of viewpoint. ELT Journal, 371, 304–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delamere, T. (1996). The importance of interlanguage errors with respect to stereotyping by native speakers in their judgements of second language learners’ performance. System, 241, 279–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. (2002). “They speaked and wrote real good”: Judgements on non-native and native grammar. Language Awareness, 111, 84–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Fasoli, F., Cramer, J., & Rakić, T. (2021). Toward a Century of Language Attitudes Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 401, 60–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A. C., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication monographs, 84(3), 385–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2020). English Language. Ethnologue: Languages of the World.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayer, J. M. & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 371, 313–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Figueredo, L. & Varnhagen, C. K. (2005). Didn’t you run the spell checker? Effects of type of spelling errors and use of a spell checker on perceptions of the author. Reading Psychology, 261, 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, J. (2007). Treebanks gone bad: Parser eveluation and retraining using a treebank of ungrammatical sentences. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 101, 129–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, V. (2010). Adult learners’ perspectives on the acquisition of L2 Russian pragmatic competence. Russian Language Journal/Русский язык, 601, 77-94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galloway, V. B. (1980). Perceptions of the Communicative Efforts of American Students of Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 641, 428–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, S., Song, H. & Tesser, A. (2010). Tained recommendations: The social comparison bias. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1131, 97–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 221, 211–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual defferences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 741, 1464–1480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hairston, M. (1984). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions repond to lapses in usage. College English, 431, 794–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kantz, M. & Yates, R. (1994). Whose judgments? A survey of faculty responses to common and highly irritating writing errors. In Partial Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar, 38–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klimanova, L. & Dembrovskaya, S. (2013). L2 identity, discourse and social networking in Russian. Language Learning and Technology, 171, 69–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreiner, D. S., Schnakenberg, S. D., Green, A. G., Costello, M. J. & and McClin, A. F. (2002). Effects of spelling errors on the perception of writers. Journal of General Psychology, 1291, 5–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 601, 44–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonard, D. J. & Gilsdorf, J. W. (1991). Language in change: Academics’ and executives’ perceptions of usage errors. The Journal of Business Communication, 271, 137–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levon, E., Sharma, D., Watt, D. J. L., Cardoso, A., & Ye, Y. (2021). Accent bias and perceptions of professional competence in England. Journal of English Linguistics, 491, 355–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirshahidi, S. (2016). I find you attractice but I don’t trust you: the case of language attitudes in Iran. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 381, 146–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mozafari, A., El-Alayli, A., Kunemund, A. & Fry, T. (2019). Impressions of businesses with language errors in print advertising: Do spelling and grammar influence the inclination to use a business? Current Psychology, 381, 1721–1727. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mumford, S. (2009). An analysis of spoken grammar: The case for production. ELT Journal, 631, 137–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 631, 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics ; National Records of Scotland ; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (2016). 2011 Census aggregate data. UK Data Service (Edition: June 2016). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Planken, B., van Meurs, F. & Maria, K. (2019). Do errors matter? The effects of actual and perceived L2 English errors in writing on native and non-native English speakers’ evaluations of the text, the writer and the persuasiveness of the text. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 61, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1981). The Ethnography of TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 151, 105–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queen, R. & Boland, J. E. (2015). I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates. Linguistics Vanguard, 11, 283–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, F. & Cimasko, T. (2008). Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors’ responses to second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 171, 125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, D. L., & Williams-James, M. (1997). The impact of writer nationality on mainstream teacher’s judgments of composition quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 61, 139–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santos, T. (1988). Professors’ reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 221, 69–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., Gilbers, S. & Nota, A. (2014). Ultimate attainment in late second language acquisition: Phonetic and grammatical challenges in advanced Dutch-English bilingualism. Second Language Research, 301, 129–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1993). Comparing native and nonnative teachers’ evaluations of error seriousness. Japanese Association of Language Teaching Journal, 151, 181–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spillner, B. (2017). Error analysis in the world. Frank and Timme GmbH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Key readings in social psychology. In John T. Jost & Jim Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings, Key readings in social psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2015). Performance descriptors for language learners. ACTFL Publishing, Alexandria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, R., Cartwright, K. B., Swords, R. (2012). Factoring AAVE into reading assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 651, 416–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, K. C., Yagelski, R., & Yu, F. (2014). The nature of error in adolescent student writing. Reading and Writing, 271, 1073–1094. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, S., Liu, D., & Li, Z. (2022). Testing the Bottleneck Hypothesis: Chinese EFL learners’ knowledge of morphology and syntax across proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 026765832211285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sun, Hui, Petar Čolović, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2024. L1 listeners’ evaluations of LX speech: the role of listener expectations and personality traits. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue