Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.1–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments

 | University of Alabama at Birmingham |
 | University of Florida |
Published online: 18 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00004.fle
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of input variation on the production and perception of English phonetic segments by native Spanish adults who had immigrated to the United States after the age of 16 years. The native Spanish (NS) participants were assigned to three groups of 20 each according to years of English input (years of U.S. residence multiplied by percent English use outside the home). Experiment 1 assessed the perceived relation between English and Spanish vowels. It yielded similar results for the NS groups designated “Low input” (M = 0.2 years of input), “Mid” (M = 1.2 years) and “High” (M = 3.0 years). Experiments 2–4 examined English vowel discrimination, vowel production and consonant discrimination. Apart from a modest improvement in vowel discrimination, these experiments showed little improvement as years of English input increased. One possible explanation for the essentially null finding of this study is that input matters little or not at all when an L2 is learned naturalistically following the closure of a critical period. Another possibility is that adequate native speaker input is crucial for L2 speech learning but the input differences evaluated here were insufficient to yield measurable improvements in performance. We conclude the article by illustrating a new technique that might be used to choose between these competing explanations.
Article outline
  • The present study
    • General methods
      • Participants
      • Procedures
  • Experiment 1.Cross language mapping
    • Method
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure
    • Results
      • Classification
      • Not Spanish
      • Goodness of fit
  • Experiment 2.The discrimination of English vowels
    • Method
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure
      • Results and discussion
  • Experiment 3.Production of English vowels
    • Method
    • Auditory evaluation
    • Result and discussion
  • Experiment 4.Consonant discrimination
    • Method
    • Results and discussion
  • General discussion
    • Learning English /p t k/
    • Evaluating the role of input in L2 speech learning
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (68)
References
Aslin, R., & Pisoni, D. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In G. Yeni-Komshian et al. (Eds.), Child phonology, Volume 2, Perception (pp. 67–96). New York, NY: Academic press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2008). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA. (pp. 191–206). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1835–1842.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Elman, J. (1996). Learning rediscovered. Science, 274(5294), 1849–1850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruer, J. (2001). A critical and sensitive period primer. In D. Bailey, J. Bruer, F. Symons, & J. Licthman (Eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 3–26). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, F. (1999). What’s within? Nativism reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1751, 526–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2004). Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3668–3678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalbor, J. (1980). Spanish pronunciation. Theory and practice. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 221, 499–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period mean? In J. Kroll & A. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism. Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A., & Francis, A. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 401, 55–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Docherty, G., Watt, D., Llamas, C., Hall, D., & Nycz, J. (2011). Variation in voice onset time along the Scottish-English border. In W. Lee (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII): August 17–21, 2011(pp. 591–594). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eguchi, S., & Hirsch, I. (1969). Development of speech sounds in children. Acta Otolyaryngologica, Supplement 157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (1979). Performance of children ages 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 661, 651–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliott, L., Busse, L., Partridge, R., Rupert, J., & DeGraaff, R. (1986). Adult and child discrimination of CV syllables differing in Voicing Onset Time. Child Development, 571, 628–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. & Hammond, R. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). A critical period for L2 learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 81, 162–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders. A review – 1988 (pp. 224–401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Differences in inventory size affects the location but not the precision of tongue positioning in vowel production. Language and Speech, 321, 123–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991a). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 891, 395–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991b). Orthographic evidence for the perceptual identification of vowels in Spanish and English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 431, 701–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In E. Fava & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 19–44). Padova: Uni Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Give input a chance! In T. Piske & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). It’s input that matters most, not age. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. -S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 437–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1986). Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 431, 155–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 151, 67–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 831, 729–740. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E., Walley, A., & Randazza, L. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 201, 155–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 527–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. (2011). What accounts for “age” effects on overall degree of foreign accent? In M. Wrembel, M. Kul & Dziubalska-Koɫaczyk, K. (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech. New Sounds 2010, Vol. 21 (pp. 65–82). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. (1994). The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 161, 381–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 3125–3134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 401, 467–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Schmidt, A. (1995). Native speakers of Spanish show rate-dependent processing of English stop consonants. Phonetica, 521, 90–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Schmidt, A., & Wharton, G. (1996). Age of learning affects rate-dependent processing of stops in a second language. Phonetica, 531, 143–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, R. A., Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 2540–2551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frieda, E., Walley, A., Flege, J. E., & Sloane, M. (1999). Adults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(3), 561–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, P., & Froud, K. (2018). Perception of American English vowels by sequential Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(1), 80–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. (2012). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (1999). The development of phoneme categorization in children aged 6 to 12 years. In J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 2493–2496). Berkeley, CA: Department of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). London: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2000). Children’s phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 431, 129–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koenig, L. (2001). Distributional characteristics of VOT in children’s voiceless aspirated stops and interpretation of developmental trends. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 441, 1058–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S., Potamianos, A., & Narayanan, S. (1999). Acoustics of children’s speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1051, 1455–1468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V. (2007). Cross-language perceptual assimilation and discrimination of southern British English vowels by Greek and Japanese learners of English. In W. Barry & J. Trouvain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1641 to 1644). Saarbrücken: Saarland University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constrains on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 251–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 581, 103–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGarrigle, R., Munro, K., Dawes, P., Stewart, A., Moore, D., Barry, J., & Amitay, S. (2014). Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? International Journal of Audiology, 53(7) 433–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2008). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159–174). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M. (2008). Input matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (2005). The ‘Language Instinct’ debate. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., & Flege, J. E. (1995). Effects of speaking rate changes on native and nonnative production. Phonetica, 521, 41–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Speaking rate effects on stops produced by Spanish and English monolinguals and Spanish/English bilinguals. Phonetica, 531, 162–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scholes, R. (1967). Phonemic categorization of synthetic vocalic stimuli by speakers of Japanese, Spanish, Persian and American English. Language and Speech, 101, 46–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2014). Effects of age of learning on voice onset time: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. Language and Speech, 57(4), 425–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Alphen, P., & Smits, R. (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 321, 455–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Alphen, P., & McQueen, J. (2006). The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 178–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whiteside, S., & Dobbin, R. H. (2003). Patterns of variability in voice onset time: A developmental study of motor speech skills in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 347(1), 29–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2002). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Hanulíková, Adriana & Helena Levy
2025. Quantifying Experience with Accented Speech to Study Monolingual and Bilingual School-Aged Children’s Speech Processing. Languages 10:4 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
MacWhinney, Brian & Zhe Gao
2025. Six advances in research on bilingualism. Brain and Language 268 ► pp. 105614 ff. DOI logo
Turner, James
2025. The role of L2 input in developing a novel L2 contrast phonetically and phonologically: Production evidence from a residence abroad context. Second Language Research 41:1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Bäumler, Linda
2024. Loanword Phonology of Spanish Anglicisms: New Insights from Corpus Data. Languages 9:9 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo
Dimitriou, Dimitra
2024. Greek-Cypriot learners’ perception and production of L2 English vowels. Lingua 310 ► pp. 103805 ff. DOI logo
Ng, Bee Kee & Poh Shin Chiew
2024. Phonetic variation of initial stop consonants in Malaysian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 45:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Ng, Bee Kee & Poh Shin Chiew
2024. L1 Influence on Stop Consonant Production: A Case Study of Malaysian Mandarin-English Bilinguals. Asian Englishes 26:2 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Syed, Nasir Abbas & Shah Bibi
2024. VOT for plosives in the indigenous languages of Balochistan. Journal of Second Language Studies 7:1 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Fenqi, Delin Deng, Kevin Tang & Ratree Wayland
2024. The Effect of Pitch Accent on the Perception of English Lexical Stress: Evidence from English and Mandarin Chinese Listeners. Languages 9:3 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Bäumler, Linda & Frederik Hartmann
2023. Sociogeographical differences in the pronunciation of Anglicisms in Spanish. In Corpus Dialectology [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 110], ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine L. & Brian MacWhinney
2023. Age effects in second language acquisition: Expanding the emergentist account. Brain and Language 241 ► pp. 105269 ff. DOI logo
Leppik, Katrin, Pärtel Lippus & Eva Liina Asu
2023. The perception and production of Estonian vowels and vocalic quantity contrasts by Spanish L1 learners. Ampersand 11 ► pp. 100147 ff. DOI logo
Yumo, Ci, Cristina Flores & Diana Moreira de Oliveira
2023. Perceção das consoantes fricativas do português língua segunda por aprendentes chineses. Diacrítica 36:2 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Magdalena Kachlicka, Yui Suzukida, Katya Petrova, Bradford J. Lee & Adam Tierney
2022. Auditory precision hypothesis-L2: Dimension-specific relationships between auditory processing and second language segmental learning. Cognition 229 ► pp. 105236 ff. DOI logo
Flege, James Emil
2021. New Methods for Second Language (L2) Speech Research. In Second Language Speech Learning, ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Flege, James Emil & Ocke-Schwen Bohn
2021. The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Second Language Speech Learning, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Fouz-González, Jonás & Jose A. Mompean
2021. EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF PHONETIC SYMBOLS AND KEYWORDS AS LABELS FOR PERCEPTUAL TRAINING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Setter, Jane & Takehiko Makino
2021. Pronunciation Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics, ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Voeten, Cesko C.
2021. Individual Differences in the Adoption of Sound Change. Language and Speech 64:3 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Casillas, Joseph V.
2020. The Longitudinal Development of Fine‐Phonetic Detail: Stop Production in a Domestic Immersion Program. Language Learning 70:3 ► pp. 768 ff. DOI logo
Casillas, Joseph V.
2024. The Speech Production of Bilingual Adults. In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology, ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xinchun & Jidong Chen
2020. The Acquisition of Mandarin Consonants by English Learners: The Relationship between Perception and Production. Languages 5:2 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Kartushina, Natalia & Clara D. Martin
2019. Third-language learning affects bilinguals’ production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2 and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics 77 ► pp. 100920 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue