Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp.167–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech

 |  | Universitat de Barcelona |
 |  |
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.01lud
This study investigated the relationship between processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech as a function of an L1- match between speaker and listener and non-native listeners’ proficiency. Instructed L2-English learners differing in L1 (Catalan, German) and L2-proficiency (Low, High), and native-English listeners performed speeded speech processing tasks with English word and sentence stimuli spoken by L1-Catalan, L1-German and native English speakers, and rated the sentence stimuli for comprehensibility. The results showed significant moderate correlations between processing times and comprehensibility judgments mediated by an interaction between listeners’ L1 and their L2 proficiency. Non-native English was processed faster and judged to be more comprehensible by non-native listeners if produced by L1-matched speakers. When non-native English was produced by L1-matched speakers, low-proficiency listeners found it easier to process and understand than native English, whereas high-proficiency listeners showed a processing advantage over native English listeners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Factors affecting the comprehensibility of non-native speech
    • 1.2Processing time and comprehensibility judgments of non-native speech
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
      • 2.1.1Speakers
      • 2.1.2Listeners
    • 2.2Speech materials
    • 2.3Perception tasks
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Effects of Listener’s L1 and Proficiency on the processing time of words and sentences
    • 3.2Effects of listeners’ L1 and proficiency on comprehensibility ratings
    • 3.3How does processing time relate to perceived comprehensibility?
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (40)
References
Adank, P., Evans, B., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 520–529.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broersma, M., & Scharenborg, O. (2010). Native and non-native listeners’ perception of English consonants in different types of noise. Speech Communication, 52(11), 980–995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 193–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015a). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T. (2015b). Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 814–837. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 481, 393–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1994). The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 381–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goslin, J., Duffy, H., & Floccia, C. (2012). An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and language, 122(2), 92–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. (2008). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for NSs of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 361, 664–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 231, 83–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 459–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2012). The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 508–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 245–270). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I. (2016). Tools for researching vocabulary. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 451, 285–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 381, 289–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M., Derwing, T., & Morton, S. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 281, 111–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 631, 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortmeyer, C., & Boyle, J. (1985). The effect of accent differences on comprehension. RELC Journal, 16(2), 48–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinet, M., Iverson, P., & Huckvale, M. (2011). Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: The role of L2 experience and acoustic similarity in the talker-listener accent interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(3), 1653–1662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2015a). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 191, 597–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 644–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. Kroll & A. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stibbard, R., & Lee, J. (2006). Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1201, 433–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Wijngaarden, S. J., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T. (2002). Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for NNLs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1906–1916. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., Broersma, M., & Aoyagi, M. (2011). Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 479–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Jeong, Hyeseung & Stephanie Lindemann
2025. Beyond ideologies of nativeness in the intelligibility principle for L2 English pronunciation: A corpus-supported review. System 129 ► pp. 103599 ff. DOI logo
Pietraszek, Mateusz
2025. Intelligibility benefits and attitudinal disadvantages? The listener’s mother tongue and level as variables affecting the pronunciation ratings of Spanish speakers’ English. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Sasaki, Miyuki, Yui Suzukida, Kotaro Takizawa & Kazuya Saito
2024. What influences the comprehensibility of L2 writers' opinion texts by L2 readers? Interactions between textual characteristics and readers’ profiles. System 123 ► pp. 103352 ff. DOI logo
Gallant, Jordan
2023. , DOI logo
Gallant, Jordan
2023. Typed transcription as a simultaneous measure of foreign-accent comprehensibility and intelligibility: An online replication study. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 100055 ff. DOI logo
GOKGOZ-KURT, Burcu
2023. Intercultural Communicative Competence and Attitudes towards English Accents: Exploring the Nexus among EFL speakers. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 9:2 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Mora, Joan C., Sapna Sehgal & Raquel Serrano
2023. Oral fluency measures in study abroad research. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Verbeke, Gil & Ellen Simon
2023. Listening to accents: Comprehensibility, accentedness and intelligibility of native and non-native English speech. Lingua 292 ► pp. 103572 ff. DOI logo
Dokovova, Marie, James M. Scobbie & Robin Lickley
2022. Matched-accent processing: Bulgarian-English bilinguals do not have a processing advantage with Bulgarian-accented English over native English speech. Laboratory Phonology 13:1 DOI logo
Mora, Joan C.
2022. Accentedness and Comprehensibility in Non-native Listeners’ Perception of L2 Speech. In Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya & Yuwei Liu
2022. Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research 38:3 ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Uchihara, Takumi
2022. Is it possible to measure word-level comprehensibility and accentedness as independent constructs of pronunciation knowledge?. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 100011 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya
2020. Multi‐ or Single‐Word Units? The Role of Collocation Use in Comprehensible and Contextually Appropriate Second Language Speech. Language Learning 70:2 ► pp. 548 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Pavel Trofimovich, Mariko Abe & Yo In'nami
2020. Dunning-Kruger effect in second language speech learning: How does self perception align with other perception over time?. Learning and Individual Differences 79 ► pp. 101849 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Mai Tran, Yui Suzukida, Hui Sun, Viktoria Magne & Meltem Ilkan
2019. HOW DO SECOND LANGUAGE LISTENERS PERCEIVE THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF FOREIGN-ACCENTED SPEECH?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5 ► pp. 1133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue