Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp.9–33
Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian
Published online: 14 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.01hac
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.01hac
Previous research has shown that English-speaking learners of Russian, even those with advanced proficiency, often have not acquired the contrast between palatalized and unpalatalized consonants, which is a central feature of the Russian consonant system. The present study examined whether training utilizing electropalatography (EPG) could help a group of Russian learners achieve more native-like productions of this contrast. Although not all subjects showed significant improvements, on average, the Russian learners showed an increase from pre- to post-training in the second formant frequency of vowels preceding palatalized consonants, thus enhancing their contrast between palatalized and unpalatalized consonants. To determine whether these acoustic differences were associated with increased identification accuracy, three native Russian speakers listened to all pre- and post-training productions. A modest increase in identification accuracy was observed. These results suggest that even short-term EPG training can be an effective intervention with adult L2 learners.
Keywords: Russian, electropalatography, palatalization, training study, consonants
References (40)
Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 81, 215–220.
Babel, M., & Johnson, K. (2007). Cross-linguistic differences in the perception of palatalization. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program, version 5.3.23]. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Bolanos, L. (2013). Perception and production in non-native speech: Russian palatalization. Proceedings of
Meetings on Acoustics. Acoustical Society of America
, 191, 1–7.
Bryzgunova, E. A. (1963). Praktičeskaja fonetika i intonacija russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo moskovskogo universiteta.
Cleland, J., Timmins, C., Wood, S. E., Hardcastle, W. J., & Wishart, J. G. (2009). Electropalatographic therapy for children and young people with Down’s syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 231, 926–939.
Demenko, G., Wagner, A., & Cylwik, N. (2010). The use of speech technology in foreign language pronunciation training. Archives of Acoustics, 351, 309–329.
Diehm, E. E. (1998). Gestures and linguistic function in learning Russian: Production and perception studies of Russian palatalized consonants. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 98339681).
Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 251, 37–64.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124.
Fujiwara, Y. (2007). Electropalatography home training using a portable training unit for Japanese children with cleft palate. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 91, 65–72.
Gibbon, F. (1990). Lingual activity in two speech-disordered children’s attempts to produce velar and alveolar stop consonants: Evidence from electropalatographic (EPG) data. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 251, 329–340.
Gibbon, F. E., & Wood, S. E. (2003). Using electropalatography (EPG) to diagnose and treat articulation disorders associated with mild cerebral palsy: a case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 171, 365–374.
Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, W. J., & Suzuki, H. (1991). An electropalatographic study of the /r/, /1/ distinction for Japanese learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 41, 153–171.
Gierut, J. A., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1986). On word-initial voicing: Converging sources of evidence in phonologically disordered speech. Language and Speech, 291, 97–114.
Hacking, J. (2011). The production of palatalized and unpalatalized consonants in Russian by American learners. In Magdalena Wrembel, Małgorzata Kul, & Katarzyna Dziubalska- Kołaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds (pp. 93–101). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hacking, J., Smith, B., Nissen, S., & Allen, H. (2016). Russian palatalized and unpalatalized coda consonants: An electropalatographic and acoustic analysis of native speaker and L2 learner productions. Journal of Phonetics, 541, 98–108.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
Hardy, J. E. (1993). Phonological learning and retention in second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckman (Ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech pathology (pp. 235–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1381, 817–832.
Kavitskaya, D. (2006). Perceptual salience and palatalization in Russian. Laboratory phonology 81, 589–610.
Kavitskaya, D., Iskarous, K., Noiray, A., & Proctor, M. (2009). Trills and palatalization: Consequences for sound change. Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 171, 97–110.
Lohmander, A., Henriksson, C., & Havstam, C. (2010). Electropalatography in home training of retracted articulation in a Swedish child with cleft palate: Effect on articulation pattern and speech. International journal of speech-language pathology, 121, 483–496.
Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Hula, S. N. A., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 171, 277–298.
Machovikov, A., Stolyarov, K., Chernov, M., Sinclair, I., & Machovikova, I. (2002). Computer-based training system for Russian word pronunciation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 151, 201–214.
Massaro, D. W., Liu, Y., Chen, T. H., & Perfetti, C. (2006). A multilingual embodied conversational agent for tutoring speech and language learning. Proceedings of
Interspeech
20061 (pp. 825–828).
McAuliffe, M. J., & Cornwell, P. L. (2008). Intervention for lateral/s/using electropalatography (EPG) biofeedback and an intensive motor learning approach: a case report. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 431, 219–229.
Nordberg, A., Carlsson, G., & Lohmander, A. (2011). Electropalatography in the description and treatment of speech disorders in five children with cerebral palsy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 251, 831–852.
Ordin, M. (2010). Palatalization and temporal organization of CVC clusters in Russian. Russian Linguistics, 341, 57–65.
Patten, I., & Edmonds, L. A. (2015). Effect of training Japanese L1 speakers in the production of American English /r/ using spectrographic visual feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 281, 241–259.
Purcell, E.T. (1979). Formant frequency patterns in Russian VCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 661, 1691–1702.
Ruellot, V. (2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French /u/ and /y/ at the intermediate level. In Proceedings of the
2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference
(pp. 199–213).
Schmidt, A. M. (2012). Effects of EPG treatment for English consonant contrasts on L2 perception and production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 261, 909–925.
Schmidt, A. M., & Beamer, J. (1998). Electropalatography treatment for training Thai speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 121, 389–403.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Fouz-González, Jonás
2024. Using technology to facilitate the integration of pronunciation into the classroom. In La integración de la pronunciación en el aula de ELE [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 42], ► pp. 207 ff.
Fouz-González, Jonás & Joan C. Mora
2024. Exploring the potential of textually‑enhanced captioned video to
direct learners’ attention to challenging sound contrasts. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
Nissen, Shawn L., Rachel Kemmey & K. James Hartshorn
Steele, Jeffrey
Woo, Seong Tak
Levis, John
2021. L2 pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Roon, Kevin D., Jaekoo Kang & D.H. Whalen
Levis, John M.
Levis, John M.
2018. Technology and second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Levis, John M.
Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
