Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 11:3 (2025) ► pp.363–393
Hul’q’umi’num’ listening quizzes
Speech perception in a language revitalization classroom context
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Oxford.
Published online: 3 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.25001.per
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.25001.per
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss a set of 60 listening quizzes, created to support adult learners of Hul’q’umi’num’
(Coast Salish) in fine-tuning their listening and speaking skills. Hul’q’umi’num’ has a rich consonant inventory, including many
sounds not found in learners’ L1 (English). The goal of the quizzes was twofold: provide learners with opportunities to practice
hearing these sounds and, at the same time, inform us about the features of Hul’q’umi’num’ L2 speech perception. Findings showed
which sounds were particularly easy or challenging, laying the foundation for creating more targeted resources to better aid sound
acquisition among Hul’q’umi’num’ learners. Evidence of improvement in perceptual ability after taking the quizzes was also found.
This work contributes to diversifying scientific approaches to second language acquisition by showing how speech perception
research and pedagogy can be combined in an Indigenous language revitalization context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Hul’q’umi’num’ context
- 1.2Listening training for speech production and perception
- 2.Listening quizzes for Hul’q’umi’num’ learners
- 2.1Creation process
- 2.2Organization, format, and types
- 2.2.1Organization
- 2.2.2Format
- 2.2.3Types
- 2.3Linguistic sets
- 3.Perceptual training experiment
- 3.1Methodology
- 3.1.1Participants
- 3.1.2Materials
- 3.1.3Procedure
- 3.2Analysis
- 3.2.1Difficult contrasts
- 3.2.2Improvement over the training phase
- 3.2.3Improvement from pre- to posttest
- 3.2.4Qualitative analysis: Student feedback
- 3.1Methodology
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Interpretation of results
- 4.2Usability for pedagogy
- 4.3Best practices for quiz creation in a revitalization context
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (54)
Abel, J., Allen, B., Burton, S., Kazama, M., Kim, B., Noguchi, M., Tsuda, A., Yamane, N., & Gick, B. (2015). Ultrasound-enhanced
multimodal approaches to pronunciation teaching and learning. Canadian
Acoustics, 43(3).
Baese-Berk, M. M., Kapnoula, E. C., & Samuel, A. G. (2024). The
relationship of speech perception and speech production: It’s complicated. Psychonomic Bulletin
&
Review, 32(1), 226–242.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative
and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In:
In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language
experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil
Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.
Bird, S., Leonard, J. & Nolan, T. (2022). Pronunciation
patterns among L2 Hul’q’umi’num’ learners: Preliminary findings and future
directions. In J. Levis & A. Guskaroska (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 12th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Conference, held June
2021 virtually at Brock University, St. Catharines, ON.
Bird, S., Claxton, R., & Percival, M. (2023). Seeing Speech: Using Praat to Visualize Hul’q’umi’num’ Sounds. Language Documentation & Conservation, 171, 297–324.
Bird, S., & Miyashita, M. (2018). Teaching
phonetics in the context of Indigenous language
revitalization. In Proceedings of ISAPh 2018 International Symposium
on Applied
Phonetics (pp. 39–44).
Bird, S., Gerdts, D., & Leonard, J. (2016). The
realisation of coronal obstruents across Hul’q’umi’num’ speakers. Canadian
Acoustics, 44(3), 134–135.
Bliss, H., Burton, S., & Gick, B. (2016). Ultrasound
Overlay Videos and Their Application in Indigenous Language Learning and
Revitalization. Canadian
Acoustics, 44(3).
Bliss, H., Bird, S., Cooper, A. P., Burton, S., & Gick, B. (2018). Seeing
speech: Ultrasound-based multimedia resources for pronunciation learning in Indigenous
languages. Language Documentation &
Conservation, 121, 315–338.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat:
doing phonetics by computer (version 6.3.20) (Retrieved November 15, 2023, from [URL]).
Brant, T. J. (2023). Tó:
nya’teká:yen tsi Entewà:ronke’ — Onkwehonwe’néha Documentation for Advanced Adult Kanyen’kéha
Learning. [Doctorial Dissertation, University of Victoria]. UVicSpace Institutional Repository. [URL]
Burton, S., Sonja, T., & Schellenberg, M. (2025). A Self-Paced Halq’eméylem Sound Course as a Scalable Model for Teaching Sounds of Under-Resourced Languages of Canada. Presentation at ICSNL 60. Chilliwack BC, July 22nd.
Chan, R., Chen, V., Kumashiro, A., Leung, B., & Percival, M. (2013). The
perception of Hul’q’umi’num’ ejective stops by native speakers of English [unpublished
manuscript].
Cohn, M. (2019). Change
mean intensity of all files [Praat script]. [URL]
Czaykowska-Higgins, E. (2018). Reflections
on ethics: Re-humanizing linguistics, building relationships across
difference. In B. McDonnell, A. Berez-Kroeker, & G. Holton (Eds.), Language
Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 15: Reflections on Language Documentation 20 Years after Himmelmann
1998: 110–121.
de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych:
A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research
Methods, 471, 1–12.
Filevich, E. (2024, June 16). “Worker
and study link
types”. JATOS. Retrieved June 23, 2024, from [URL]
Flege, J. E. (1995a). Second
language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech
perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language
research (pp. 229–273). York Press.
(1995b). Two
procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 161, 425–442.
(2003). Assessing
constraints on second-language segmental production and
perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics
and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and
similarities (pp. 319–355). Mouton de Gruyter.
Gardner, E., & Ciotti, S. (2018). An
Overview of Where Are Your Keys? In L. Hinton, L. Huss, & G. Roche (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Language
Revitalization (pp. 137–145). Routledge.
Gerdts, D. B., & Hinkson, M. Q. (1996). Hul’q’umi’num’
Phonics. Chemainus, Nanaimo, Nanoose First Nations, First Nations Education Services &
School District 681. [URL]
Gerdts, D. B., & Penrowley, C. (1999). Halkomelem
Talking Dictionary. Nanaimo First Nations and Nanaimo School District No.
68.
Gessner, S., Herbert, T., & Parker, A. (2022). Report
on the Status of B.C. First Nations Languages (Fourth
Edition). First Peoples’ Cultural Council. [URL]
Giannakopoulou, A., Brown, H., Clayards, M., & Wonnacott, E. (2017). High
or low? Comparing high and low-variability phonetic training in adult and child second language
learners. PeerJ, 51, e3209.
Herd, W., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2013). Perceptual
and production training of intervocalic /d, ɾ, r/ in American English learners of
Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 1331, 4274–4255.
HP5
Group. (2024). HP5. Retrieved June 28, 2024, from [URL]
Howson, P., & Bird, S. (2021). Coronal
fricatives among L1 and L2 Hul’q’umi’num’ speakers. Canadian
Acoustics, 39(3), 30–31.
Hulʼqʼumiʼnumʼ Online
Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved July, 2021, from [URL]
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning
English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: II. Auditory training for native Spanish and German
speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 1261, 866–877.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous
methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Lange, K., Kühn, S., & Filevich, E. (2015). “Just
Another Tool for Online Studies” (JATOS): An Easy Solution for Setup and Management of Web Servers Supporting Online
Studies. PloS
one, 10(6), e0130834.
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The
Effectiveness of Second Language Pronunciation Instruction: A Meta-Analysis. Applied
Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.
Lenth, R. V. (2024, July 1). Package
‘emmeans’ [R package]. Retrieved July 11, 2024, from [URL]
Leonard, W. Y. (2018). Reflections
on (de)colonialism in language documentation. In B. McDonnell, A. Berez-Kroeker, & G. Holton (Eds.), Language
Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 15: Reflections on Language Documentation 20 Years after Himmelmann
1998 (pp. 55–65).
Mellesmoen, G. & Babel, M. (2020). Acoustically
distinct and perceptually ambiguous: ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Salish) fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of
America, 1471, 2959–2973.
Munro, M. (2018). How
Well Can We Predict Second Language Learners’ Pronunciation Difficulties?. The CATESOL
Journal, 301, 267–281.
Noahedits (2019). Map of Coast Salish linguistic distribution in the early to mid 1800s. Retrieved from [URL]
Percival, M. (2024). Production
and perception of ejective stops across languages. [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations
& Theses Global.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can
perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A metaanalytic review of 25 years of perception
training research. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2024). afex:
Analysis of Factorial Experiments [R package]. Retrieved July 8, 2024, from [URL]
Tatul’ut tthu
Hul’q’umi’num’. (2008). Lessons. Retrieved June 29, 2024, from [URL]
ta’ulthun sqwal. (2016). Learning the
Sounds. Retrieved June 29,
2024, from [URL]
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic
analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in
psychology, 2(17–37), 25.
Thomson, R. & Derwing, T. (2015). The
Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review. Applied
Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344.
Tripp, A., Munson, B. (2022). Perceiving
gender while perceiving language: Integrating psycholinguistics and gender theory. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive
Science, 13(2), e1583.
Trofimovich, P. (2023, August 7–11). Beyond
accent, attitudes, and native speakers: What might socially responsible second language speech research look
like? [Conference plenary
address]. 2023 International Congress of the Phonetic
Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of
Canada. (2015). What we have learned: Principles of truth and
reconciliation.
Uchihara, T., Karas, M., & Thomson, R. (2021, June). High
Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT): A meta-analysis. Paper presented
at Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching (PSLLT)
conference [Online].
Vitevitch, M. S., & Aljasser, F. M. (2021). Phonotactics
in Spoken-Word Recognition. In Pardo, J. S., Nygaard, L. C., Remez, R. E. and Pisoni, D. B. (Eds.), The
Handbook of Speech Perception. Wiley.
Whalen, D. H., DiCanio, C., & Dockum, R. (2022). Phonetic
Documentation in Three Collections: Topics and Evolution Journal of the International Phonetic
Association. 52(1), 95–121.
