Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 10:2 (2024) ► pp.204–231

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The influence of linguistic and cognitive background on word stress processing in an unknown language

ORCiD logo with link | University of Fribourg | University of Bern
 | University of Fribourg
 | University of Fribourg | Gymnasium Interlaken
 | University of Fribourg
 | University of Fribourg | Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
 | University of Fribourg
 | University of Fribourg
Published online: 28 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23028.sch
Abstract
Individual differences in working memory and musical aptitude, as well as task complexity are crucial in predicting the performance of word stress perception in a second language (L2). The present study investigated the interactive effects of these factors with the listeners’ first language. French and German listeners, both without knowledge of Spanish, performed stress-related tasks in Spanish, as well as musical and working memory tests in their L1. Besides confirming the impact of L1, our findings better define the influence of working memory and musical aptitude on L2 stress perception by specifically tapping into the central executive component of working memory, objectively assessing musical aptitude, and considering task complexity as a moderating factor in the relationship between the inter-individual factors and L2 stress perception. Our findings are also the first to demonstrate task-specific performance differences between French and German listeners, possibly reflecting differential cognitive and perceptual mechanisms depending on L1.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1First language (L1)
    • 1.2Working memory
    • 1.3Musical aptitude
    • 1.4The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Working memory capacity
    • 2.3Musical aptitude
    • 2.4Stress-related tasks
      • 2.4.1Identification
        • Material
        • Acoustic description and perceptual evaluation of the stimuli
        • Procedure
      • 2.4.2Odd-One-Out
        • Material and design
        • Acoustic description and perceptual evaluation of the stimuli
        • Procedure
    • 2.5Data analysis
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Data availability
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. INTERSPEECH 2005 – Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4–8 2005, 397–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aliaga-García, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E. (2011). L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 47(1), 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avanzi, M., Schwab, S., Dubosson, P. & Goldman, J.-P. (2012). La prosodie de quelques variétés de français parlées en Suisse romande. In A. C. Simon (Ed.), La variation prosodique régionale en français (pp. 89–118). Bruxelles: De Boeck/ Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 417–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 8 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 1051, 158–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Software]. [URL]
Chang, C. B., & Kwon, S. (2020). The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartrand, J. P., & Belin, P. (2006). Superior voice timbre processing in musicians. Neuroscience letters, 405(3), 164–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crespo, M. (2011). The effects of task complexity on L2 oral production as mediated by differences in working memory capacity. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Barcelona.
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 401, 63–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degrave, P. (2020). Music training and the use of songs or rhythm: Do they help for lexical stress processing? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(3), 799–824. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1938). L’accent final en français: accent d’intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. The French Review, 121, 141–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 71, 294–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: a lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5):843–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dogil, G., & Williams, B. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp. 273–334). Berlin, New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing ‘deafness’ in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), 406–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish, Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egeland, J. (2015). Measuring working memory with digit span and the Letter-Number Sequencing subtests from the WAIS-IV: Too low manipulation load and risk for underestimating modality effects, Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22 (6), 445–451, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In: B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 44 (pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance. In T. Piske, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garde, P. (1968). L’accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, E. (1989). Advanced measures of music audition. Chicago: GIA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., & Csépe, V. (2019). Cognitive components of foreign word stress processing difficulty in speakers of a native language with non-contrastive stress. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 366–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2012). Stress and rhythm. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 153–171). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2019). Individual differences in L2 speech perception: The role of phonological memory and lipreading ability. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 782–799. [URL].
Ivanova, M., Neubert, C. M., Schmied, J., & Benedixen, A. (2023). ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English. Frontiers in Psychology, 141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, N., Harding, E., Loerts, H., Başkent, D., & Lowie, W. (2022). The relation between musical ability and sentence-level intonation perception: A meta-analysis comparing L1 and non-native listening. Proc. Speech Prosody 2022, 713–717, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jessen, M., Marasek, K., Schneider, K., & Clahssen, K. (1995). Acoustic correlates of word stress and the tense/lax opposition in the vowel system of German. Proc. Int. Congress Phonetic Sci, 131, 428–431.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knight, R. A., & Hawkins, S. (2013). Research methods in speech perception. In M. J. Jones & R. A. Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics (pp. 21–38). London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolinsky, R., Cuvelier, H., Goetry, V., Peretz, I., & Morais, J. (2009). Music training facilitates lexical stress processing. Music Perception, 26(3), 235–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F. (1999). La prosodie du français. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Léon, P. (2007). Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Ríos, A., & Schwab, S. (2014). El acento en contexto: datos acústicos. In Y. Congosto Martín, M. L. Montero Curiel, & A. Salvador Plans (Eds.), Fonética experimental, educación superior e investigación Vol. I (Experimental phonetics, superior education and investigation) (pp. 357–376). Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llompart, M. (2021). Lexical and phonetic influences on the phonolexical encoding of difficult second-language contrasts: Insights from nonword rejection. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, 659852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 581, 103–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marques, C., Moreno, S., Luís Castro, S., & Besson, M. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1453–1463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielicki, M. K., Koppel, R. H., Valencia, G., & Wiley, J. (2018). Measuring working memory capacity with the letter–number sequencing task: Advantages of visual administration. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 321, 805–814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mooshammer, C., & Geng, C. (2008). Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 381, 117–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntendam, A., van Rijswijk, R., Severijnen, G. & Dijkstra, T. (2022). The role of stress position in bilingual auditory word recognition: Cognate processing in Turkish and Dutch. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 251, 679–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, R., Pelzer, B., & te Grotenhuis, M. (2012). Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal, 4(2). URL [URL]
Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P. (2009). Perception of word stress in Castilian Spanish: The effects of sentence intonation and vowel type. In M. Vigário, S. Frota, & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology. Interactions and interrelations (pp. 35–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English Speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 411, 186–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortín, R., & Simonet, M. (2023). Perceptual sensitivity to stress in native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 14(1), 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas (2nd ed.). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 221, 27–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1979). Le français, langue sans accent. Studia Phonetica, 151, 13–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Satori, M. (2021). Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(5), 1313–1340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwab, S., & Calpini, N. (2018). Expertise musicale et perception de variations de F0 en L1 et en L2. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 23(1), 15–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwab, S., & Dellwo, V. (2017). Intonation and talker variability in the discrimination of Spanish lexical stress contrasts by Spanish, German and French listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1421, 2419–2429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Music and L2 prosody: the role of musical aptitude on the discrimination of stress contrasts. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, August 5–9, 2019, Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwab, S., Kamber, J., Etter, F., Mouthon, M., Rogenmoser, L., Jost, L. B., & Annoni, Jean-Marie. (accepted). Swiss French and Swiss German speakers learning word stress in Spanish: An experimental study. In E. Glaser, J. Kabatek, & B. Sonnenhauser (Eds.), Sprachräume der Schweiz / Espaces linguistiques suisses / Language spaces in Switzerland / Spazi linguistici della Svizzera. Tübingen: Narr/Francke.
Suzukida, Y. (2021). The contribution of individual differences to L2 pronunciation learning: Insights from research and pedagogical implications. RELC Journal, 52(1), 48–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 131, 35–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., Zeng, Y., Kim, H., Lee, J., & Shin, S. (2021). Dutch listeners’ perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149 (6), 3703–3714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale – Fourth Edition (WAIS – IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 365–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xie, X., & Myers, E. (2015). The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), 419–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Cheng, B., Zou, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Cognitive factors in nonnative phonetic learning: Impacts of inhibitory control and working memory on the benefits and costs of talker variability. Journal of Phonetics, 1001, 101266, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue