Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 9:2 (2023) ► pp.167–191

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Effects of orthography and cognate status on second language Spanish lexical encoding

 | University of North Carolina Wilmington
ORCiD logo with link | University of North Carolina Wilmington
Published online: 17 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22036.far
Abstract
This study examined the accuracy of English-speaking learners of Spanish in storing L2 sounds within cognates and noncognates, specifically in words containing 〈g〉 and 〈h〉, which have differing cross-linguistic phoneme-grapheme correspondences. In the first task, participants heard Spanish words with target-like pronunciations of 〈g〉 and 〈h〉 or inaccurate pronunciations with an English-like phonemic substitution for these graphemes, and they decided whether or not they were words. The second task had participants decide between the two pronunciations of each Spanish word and select the accurate pronunciation. The findings in both tasks showed that for L2 learners, 〈h〉 cognate words had less accurate phonological representations compared to all other conditions, possibly due to the greater consistency in phoneme-grapheme correspondence for 〈h〉 in English. These results show that cognate status and orthographic (in)congruity interact to influence the accuracy of L2 lexical encoding.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Research questions & predictions
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials
      • 4.2.1Stimuli for lexical tasks
      • 4.2.2Standard Lexical Decision (SLD) task
      • 4.2.3Forced Choice Lexical Decision (FCLD) task
      • 4.2.4Headphone check
      • 4.2.5Background questionnaire
    • 4.3Procedure
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Standard Lexical Decision task
    • 5.2Forced Choice Lexical Decision task
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Data availability statement
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Amengual, M. (2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 517–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The perception of language-specific phonetic categories does not guarantee accurate phonological representations in the lexicon of early bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1221–1251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual mental lexicon: Evidence of cognate effects in the phonetic production and processing of a vowel contrast. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, Article 617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrios, S., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2021). L2 processing of words containing English /æ/-/ɛ/ and /l/-/ɹ/ contrasts, and the uses and limits of the auditory lexical decision task for understanding the locus of difficulty. Frontiers in Communication, 61, Article 689470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2017). Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 43(11), 1835–1842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassetti, B., Masterson, J., Cerni, T., & Mairano, P. (2021). Orthographic forms affect speech perception in a second language: Consonant and vowel length in L2 English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(12), 1583–1603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, E. & Harper, D. (2009). Phonological evidence of interlingual exemplar connections. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2(2), 257–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 74–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Amengual, M., & Gries, S. T. (2021). Cross-language effects of phonological and orthographic similarity in cognate word recognition: The role of language dominance. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(3), 389–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, S. V., Pandža, N. B., Lancaster, A. K., & Gor, K. (2016). Fuzzy nonnative phonolexical representations lead to fuzzy form-to-meaning mappings. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, Article 1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daidone, D. (2020). How learners remember words in their second language: The impact of individual differences in perception, cognitive abilities, and vocabulary size (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2014). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 384–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gor, K., Cook, S., Bordag, D., Chrabaszcz, A., & Opitz, A. (2021). Fuzzy lexical representations in adult second language speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, Article 732030. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 54(3), 297–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53(3), 367–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassambara, A. (2019). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.3.1. Retrieved from [URL]
Mair, P. (2019). WRS2: A collection of robust statistical methods. R package version 1.0-0. Retrieved from [URL]
Melnik, G. A., & Peperkamp, S. (2019). Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(1), EL13–EL18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12(6), 445–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rafat, Y. (2016). Orthography-induced transfer in the production of English-speaking learners of Spanish. The Language Learning Journal, 44(2), 197–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Peperkamp, S., Christophe, A., Jacquemot, C., Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2010). A psycholinguistic perspective on the acquisition of phonology. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. d’Imperio, & N. Vallée (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10: Variation, phonetic detail and phonological representation (pp. 311–340). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schepens, J., Dijkstra, T., Grootjen, F., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2013). Cross-language distributions of high frequency and phonetically similar cognates. PLoS ONE, 8(5), Article e63006. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Showalter, C. E. (2018). Impact of Cyrillic on native English speakers’ phono-lexical acquisition of Russian. Language and Speech, 61(4), 565–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 23–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, E., Chambless, D., & Alves, U. K. (2010). Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32(3), 380–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. (2012). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Petrova, A., & Ferrand, L. (2008). Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 643–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue