Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 8:2 (2022) ► pp.161–167
Rethinking pronunciation posttesting
Published online: 19 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22019.nag
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22019.nag
Abstract
Pronunciation training studies shed light on the training paradigms and features that are most likely to promote learning and lead to optimal instructional outcomes. Yet, delayed posttesting is surprisingly rare in experimental work. As such, although several research syntheses have shown that pronunciation instruction is effective for promoting short-term gains, the long-term impact of instruction remains largely unknown. In this editorial, I address the need for delayed measures in experimental pronunciation research and make the case for rethinking the number, timing, and scope of such measures.
Keywords: research methods, experimental studies, delayed measures, posttesting
References (23)
Casillas, J. V. (2020). The longitudinal development of fine-phonetic detail: Stop production in a domestic immersion program. Language Learning, 70(3), 768–806.
Cunnings, I., & Finlayson, I. (2015). Mixed effects modeling and longitudinal data analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research (pp. 159–181). Routledge.
Derwing, T. M. (2010). Utopian goals for pronunciation teaching. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 24–37). Iowa State University.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185.
Kennedy, S. & Trofimovich, P. (2010). Language awareness and second language pronunciation: A classroom study. Language Awareness, 19(3), 171–185.
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185–207.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
McAndrews, M. (2019). Short periods of instruction improve learners’ phonological categories for L2 suprasegmental features. System, 821, 151–160.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502.
Nagle, C. (2018). Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 1–19.
Nagle, C. L. (2019). A longitudinal study of voice onset time development in L2 Spanish stops. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 86–107.
Offerman, H. M., & Olson, D. J. (2016). Visual feedback and second language segmental production: The generalizability of pronunciation gains. System, 591, 45–60.
Rato, A., & Oliveira, D. (in press). Assessing the robustness of L2 perceptual training: A closer look at generalization and retention of learning. In U. Alves & J. Albuquerque (Eds.), L2 pronunciation teaching and training: Different approaches. de Gruyter Mouton.
Saito, K., Dewaele, J.-M., Abe, M., & In’nami, Y. (2018). Motivation, emotion, learning experience, and second language comprehensibility development in classroom settings: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(3), 709–743.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /r/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.
Saito, K., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2020). Domain-general auditory processing determines success in second language pronunciation learning in adulthood: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(5), 1083–1112.
Saito, K., Suzuki, S., Oyama, T., & Akiyama, Y. (2021). How does longitudinal interaction promote second language speech learning? Roles of learner experience and proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 37(4), 547–571.
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.
Sardegna, V. G., Lee, J., & Kusey, C. (2018). Self-efficacy, attitudes, and choice of strategies for English pronunciation learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 83–114.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hirschi, Kevin, Okim Kang, Mu Yang, John H. L. Hansen & Kyle Beloin
Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.