Editorial published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.141–153
Editorial
L2 pronunciation research and teaching
The importance of many languages
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 21 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21037.lev
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21037.lev
Abstract
Research on L2 pronunciation needs to occur in a much wider range of languages in order to ensure that findings are not just applicable to dominant languages. This paper argues that research on a wider variety of languages will be valuable for understanding different contexts of learning/instruction, different types and combinations of phonological features, and different instructional approaches. The field especially needs two parallel and interrelated threads of research and teaching-oriented publications. The first is descriptions of and materials for teaching pronunciation in particular languages. The second is research that is built around questions of practical interest and theoretically-motivated models of L2 speech perception and production.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Differences in contexts of learning and instruction
- Differences in phonological features
- Differences in instructional approaches
- What do we need going forward?
- This issue
- Full-length articles
- Productive phonological bootstrapping in early EFL of 4th-graders in German primary schools (Kieseier)
- Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: The techniques teachers use and why (Couper)
- Speech language pathologists’ beliefs and knowledge-base for providing pronunciation instruction: A critical survey (Foote & Thomson)
- Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research: Trends and future directions (Nagle)
- Punching through the barrier: Using gesture to activate productive oral vocabulary (Mister, Baker, Chen)
- Reviews
References
References (32)
Babashahi, S., Hansen, P., & Sullivan, T. (2021). Creating a priority list of non-communicable diseases to support health research funding decision-making. Health Policy, 125(2), 221–228.
Best, R. K. (2012). Disease politics and medical research funding: Three ways advocacy shapes policy. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 780–803.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4–64). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Bird, S. (2020). Pronunciation among adult Indigenous language learners: The case of SENĆOŦEN /t’/. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(2), 148–179.
Cruz-Ferreira, M. M. F. (1983). Non-native comprehension of intonation patterns in Portuguese and in English. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester.
Derwing, T. M. (2010). Utopian goals for pronunciation teaching. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Iowa State University, Sept. 2009. (pp. 24–37), Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fonseca, B. D. P., Albuquerque, P. C., & Zicker, F. (2020). Neglected tropical diseases in Brazil: lack of correlation between disease burden, research funding and output. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 25(11), 1373–1384.
Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., & Johnson, E. M. (2017). Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 9–33.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
Hirata, Y. (2004). Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3–4), 357–376.
Isbell, D. R., Park, O. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Learning Korean pronunciation: Effects of instruction, proficiency, and L1. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 13–48.
Levis, J. (2020). Revisiting the intelligibility and nativeness principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(3), 310–328.
Levis, J. M., & Levis, G. M. (2018). Teaching high-value pronunciation features: Contrastive stress for intermediate learners. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 139.
Liu, D. (2021). Prosody transfer failure despite cross-language similarities: Evidence in favor of a complex dynamic system approach in pronunciation teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(1), 38–61.
Mirin, A. A. (2020). Gender disparity in the funding of diseases by the US National Institutes of Health. Journal of Women’s Health.
Moyer, A. (2014). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418–440.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.
O’Brien, M. G., & Fagan, S. M. (2016). German phonetics and phonology: Theory and practice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pennington, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2000). Cantonese speakers’ memory for English sentences with prosodic cues. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 372–389.
Rao, R. (Ed.). (2019). Key issues in the teaching of Spanish pronunciation: From description to pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Prudêncio, M., & Costa, J. C. (2020). Research funding after COVID-19. Nature Microbiology, 5(8), 986–986.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of/ɹ/by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.
Tergujeff, E. (2012). English pronunciation teaching: Four case studies from Finland. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(4), 599–607.
Tergujeff, E., & Kautonen, M. (2019). Suullinen kielitaito: Opi, opeta, arvioi. Helsingissä: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava.
Thorén, B., & Jeong, H. (2020). Evaluating two ways for marking Swedish phonological length in written text: A production study. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(2), 180–208.
Van Leussen, J. W., & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 1–12.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Chau, Tuc & Amanda Huensch
Crowther, Dustin, Daniel Richard Isbell, Yoonseo Kim & Jieun Kim
Crowther, Dustin & Shawn Loewen
Koreman, Jacques
Squizzero, Robert
Crowther, Dustin & Daniel R. Isbell
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
