Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.240–264

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Speech language pathologists’ beliefs and knowledge-base for providing pronunciation instruction

A critical survey

ORCiD logo with link | University of Alberta
 | Brock University
Published online: 4 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20031.foo
Abstract
A number of studies have investigated the degree to which language instructors are prepared to offer pronunciation instruction (PI), but little research has addressed the readiness of another group of professionals, speech-language pathologists (SLPs), who are increasingly offering pronunciation instruction under the term foreign accent modification (FAM). To address this gap, the study reported here investigates the extent to which SLPs who offer PI are equipped to do so. We surveyed 54 SLPs who offer PI in North America, focusing on their beliefs, and the extent to which they are able to critically evaluate a range of statements and materials obtained from pronunciation resources. Results indicated that while survey respondents may have transferrable knowledge with respect to the articulation of speech sounds, many of their beliefs and practices are not grounded in a comprehensive understanding of the field. We recommend that SLPs offering PI should first receive specialized training in this area.
Article outline
  • 1.Terminology
  • 2.Ongoing debate over who should provide PI
  • 3.A medical approach to PI
  • 4.PI research by SLPs
  • 5.Preparedness of SLPs to offer PI
  • 6.The current study
  • 7.Method
    • 7.1Instrument
    • 7.2Participants
  • 8.Results
    • 8.1Beliefs about qualifications and the efficacy of pronunciation instruction
    • 8.2Beliefs about accents and the goals of pronunciation instruction
    • 8.3Beliefs about the nature of English pronunciation
    • 8.4Beliefs about pedagogical principles in pronunciation instruction
    • 8.5Beliefs about specific strategies and instructional techniques in pronunciation instruction
  • 9.Discussion
    • 9.1Beliefs about preparedness of SLPs to provide PI
    • 9.2Beliefs about PI
  • 10.Future directions
  • 11.Limitations and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (59)
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (1975). Meeting the needs of children and adults with disorders of language: The role of the speech pathologist or audiologist, ASHA, 171, 273–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1983). Social dialects [Position Statement]. Available from [URL]
. (2007). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of Practice]. Available from [URL]. Index terms: scope of practice
. (n.d.). Accent modification (Practice Portal). Retrieved September, 1, 2020, from [URL]
Behrman, A. (2014). Segmental and prosodic approaches to accent management. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 546–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A., & Gierut, J. A. (2002). Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(1), 57–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, H. L., & McLeod, S. (2019). Speech-language pathologists’ support for multilingual speakers’ English intelligibility and participation informed by the ICF. Journal of communication disorders, 771, 56–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(04), 447–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2001). Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 51–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2006). Integrating research and professional development on pronunciation teaching in a national adult ESL program. TESL Reporter, 391, 34–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buss, L. (2015). Beliefs and practices of Brazilian EFL teachers regarding pronunciation. Language Teaching Research, Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T. (2014). Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davila, A., Bohara, A., & Sanz, R. (1993). Accent penalties and the earnings of Mexican Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 741, 902–916.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from 4 L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 421, 476–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feinstein-Whittaker, M. (March, 2012). A growing niche in corporate America. The ASHA Leader, 171, 28–31. Retrieved from [URL]
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foote, J. A., Holtby, A., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). Survey of pronunciation teaching in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal, 29, (1), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, A., & McDaniel, L. (2016). Exploring a phonological process approach to adult pronunciation training. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(2), 172–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, A. D., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2014). Using multiple measures to document change in English vowels produced by Japanese, Korean, and Spanish speakers: The case for goodness and intelligibility. American Journal of Speech-language pathology, 23(4), 625–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fritz, D. R., & Sikorski, L. D. (2013). Efficacy in accent modification services: Quantitative and qualitative outcomes for Korean speakers of American English. SIG 14 Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Populations, 20(3), 118–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1980). Speech therapy and teaching English to speakers of other languages. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 451, 133–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ha, S., Johnson, C. J., & Kuehn, D. P. (2009). Characteristics of Korean phonology: Review, tutorial, and case studies of Korean children speaking English. Journal of communication disorders, 42(3), 163–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, A., Frost, D., Tergujeff, E., Kautzsch, A., Murphy, D., Kirkova-Naskova, A. & Curnick, L. (2012). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: selected results. Research in Language, 10(1), 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(01), 73–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuster, J. M. (April, 2010). Accent modification cited as ‘Best-Kept Secret.’ The ASHA Leader. Retreived from [URL]
Lee, S. A. S., & Sancibrian, S. (2013). Effectiveness of two different approaches to accent modification services for non-native English speakers of Korean background. Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Populations, 20(3), 127–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Cinderella no more: Leaving victimhood behind. Speak Out, 601, 7–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. (2002). Pronunciation:Views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect, 171, 3–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, N., Ball, M. J., & Guendouzi, J. (2000). Accent reduction programmes: Not a role for speech-language pathologists? Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 119–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2003). A primer on accent discrimination in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal, 20(2), 38–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, J. (2014). Myth 7: Teacher training programs provide adequate preparation in how to teach pronunciation. In L. Grant (Ed.) Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 188–224). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pendakur, K., & Pendakur, R. (1997). Speak and ye shall receive: Language knowledge as human capital (WP 97-10). Vancouver, BC: Research on Immigration and Integration in the Metropolis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, T. W. (2000). Commentaries: The turn of the scrooge: One Yank’s perspective on accent reduction. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 2(2), 145–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitz, J., & Sklar, S. (1997). Culture, race, and the economic assimilation of immigrants. Sociological Forum, 121, 233–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2015). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–24. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sardegna, V. G. (2011). Pronunciation learning strategies that improve ESL learners’ linking. In Pronunciation and intelligibility: Issues in research and practice. Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 105–121). Iowa State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. M., & Sullivan, S. (2003). Clinical training in foreign accent modification: A national survey. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 301, 127–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 201, 213–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sikorski, L. D. (2005a). Foreign accents: suggested competencies for improving communicative pronunciation. In Seminars in Speech and Language (Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 126–130). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Regional accents: A rationale for intervening and competencies required. Seminars in Speech and Language, 261, 118–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speech-Language and Audiology Canada (SAC) (2014). Scope of practice for speech-language pathology. Retrieved from [URL]
Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 281, 744–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Myth 6: Accent reduction and pronunciation instruction are the same thing. In L. Grant (Ed.) Pronunciation Myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 160–187). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Does training to perceive L2 English vowels in one phonetic context transfer to other phonetic contexts?. Canadian Acoustics, 44, (3) 198–199. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Acoustics Association.
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I., & Isaacs, T. (2009). Within-category variation in L2 English vowel learning. Canadian Acoustics, 37, (3), 138–139. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Acoustics Association.
Winkworth, A. (2000). Commentaries: Promoting Intelligibility Not Terminology: The Role of Speech-Language Pathologists in Accent Reduction Programmes. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 2(2), 139–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Kathleen F. & Bryan Pilkington
2024. Professionalism in the context of providing elective services: reflecting on bias. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 17:4 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Ramjattan, Vijay A.
2024. Accent modification and workplace accentism: the institutionalization of linguistic profiling and its career implications. Career Development International 29:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Trofimovich, Pavel, Anamaria Bodea, Thao-Nguyen Nina Le, Mary Grantham O’Brien, Masako Shimada & Cesar Teló
2024. What do students in human resource management know about accent bias?. Language Awareness 33:3 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Tsunemoto, Aki & Pavel Trofimovich
2023. Pre- and in-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments. System 118 ► pp. 103125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue