Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:3 (2021) ► pp.343–369

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on the prosody of L2 speech acts

ORCiD logo with link | Northern Arizona University
 | California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
 | Northern Arizona University
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20024.kan
Abstract
Adopting Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar prosodic framework, this study examined whether proficiency and study abroad experience impact second language (L2) English learners’ spoken production of speech acts. Twenty-four native English speakers and 64 Japanese learners of L2 English participated in the study. The L2 learner group was divided into three sub-groups: (1) high proficiency learners with study abroad (SA) experience (2) low proficiency learners with no SA experience, and (3) high proficiency learners without SA experience. Participants completed an oral discourse completion task that assessed their ability to produce two speech acts (requests and opinions) in high- and low-imposition situations. Prosodic features including intonation, pitch range, and sentence prominence were analyzed via PRAAT. The findings revealed a complex interplay between proficiency and SA experience on pragma-prosodic production. Implications suggest that SA may have the added benefit of providing the backdrop for authentic contextual functions of prosody in high- and low- imposition situations.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Effects of proficiency and study abroad on pragmatic competence
    • Prosody and pragmatics
    • Prosody and pragmatics in L2 speech production
    • The present study
  • Methods
    • Participants and research site
    • Instrument: Spoken discourse completion task
    • Data collection
    • Data analyses
      • Prosodic analyses
      • Statistical analyses
  • Results
    • Analysis of intonation patterns by situation type
    • Analysis of pitch patterns by situation type
    • Analysis of prominence by situation type
  • Discussion
  • Implications and future directions
  • Note
  • References
References (53)
References
Aijmer, K. (1996). Apologies. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity (pp. 80–123). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (2010). Prosody in interaction (Vol. 231). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.11) [Software]. Available from [URL]
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for listening: Teaching the stream of speech. Birmingham, UK: Speech in Action.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2008). A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation: The Hong Kong corpus of spoken English (prosodic) (Vol. 321). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Can I help you? The use of rise and rise-fall tones in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 85–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Prosody. In S. D’hondt, J. Östman, J., & J. Verschueren, J. (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, vol. 4) (pp. 174–189). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Pragmatics and prosody: Prosody as social action. In W. Bublitz & N. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics (pp. 491–510). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. E. (Eds.). (2004). Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (Vol. 621). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of nonnative speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 251–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 381, 201–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O., & Johnson, D. (2018). Contribution of suprasegmental to English speaking proficiency: Human rater and automated scoring system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O. & Kermad, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 78–92). England: Routledge – Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018). Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English, Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kermad, A. (2021). “From the Sound, it Look Like He Said it from the Deep in his Heart”: How do English Learners Make Judgments of Pragma-Prosodic Meaning? Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 25(1). [URL]
Knowles, G. (2016). Patterns of spoken English: An introduction to English phonetics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonation prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 241, 465–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perez-Vidal, C. & Shively, R. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Discourse Intonation: A discourse-pragmatic approach to teaching the pronunciation of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, L., Hu, G., & Baker, A. (2012). The pragmatic function of intonation: Cueing agreement and disagreement in spoken English discourse and implications for ELT. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL Pragmatics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2012). Pragmatics and prosody in English language teaching. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M. (1992). Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(4), 315–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shively, R., Menke, M., & Manzón-Omundson, S. (2008). Perception of irony by L2 learners of Spanish. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16(2). 101–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2007). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–1059. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Macmillan International Higher Education. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012a). A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 67–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Prosody in conversation: Implications for teaching English pronunciation. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011a). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 611, 904–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act Production?: Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 491, 265–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, 411, 109–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Findings and implications of study abroad research. Language Teaching, 511, 124–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Gomez-Laich, P. M., & Arrufat-Marqués, M. J. (2016). Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 491, 677–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, N. (2019). Prosodic patterns in English conversation. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of nonnative speakers. Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 399–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Discourse intonation in Second Language Acquisition: Three genre-based studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle: WA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2005). Please-from courtesy to appeal: the role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency, learning context and pragmatic development. Unpublished dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, U.S.A.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, W., Case, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2009). Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System, 371, 205–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Chen, Mo, Shuai Li, Naoko Taguchi, Yunhuai Zhang, Hengchen Guo & Chunyin Li
2025. Prosody in Pragmatic Competence: Proficiency Impact on Pitch and Fluency Features in Request‐Making in Second Language Chinese. Language Learning 75:S1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Hirschi, Kevin & Maria Kostromitina
2025. The Differential Impact of Data Collection Methods and Language Background on English Tone Choice Patterns. Languages 10:8 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Okim & Shelley Staples
2025. Transdisciplinary Intersections in Second Language Pronunciation Learning and Teaching. Language Learning 75:S1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Fengming
2025. Interpreting verbal irony in Mandarin Chinese: The role of prosody and proficiency among L2 learners of Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 249 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Kostromitina, Maria
2024. An exploratory study of intonational variation in L1 and L2 English speakers’ pragmatic production of high imposition requests and refusals. Applied Pragmatics 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Kostromitina, Maria & Alyssa Kermad
2023. Prosody and Pragmatics in Applied Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nightingale, Richard & Eva Alcón-Soler
2023. Investigating pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2023. Collecting and AnalyzingL2Pragmatics Data. In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko, Kevin Hirschi & Okim Kang
2022. LONGITUDINAL L2 DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROSODIC MARKING OF PRAGMATIC MEANING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:3 ► pp. 843 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko & Soo Jung Youn
2022. Pragmatics. In Research methods in instructed second language acquisition [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue