Article published In: 25 years of Intelligibility, Comprehensibility and Accentedness
Edited by John M. Levis, Tracey M. Derwing and Murray J. Munro
[Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3] 2020
► pp. 352–379
Comprehensibility and everyday English use
An exploration of individual trajectories over time
Published online: 4 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20011.zie
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20011.zie
Abstract
In this longitudinal study we tracked change in comprehensibility and English use over a 10-month period in 14 L2
English learners (8 beginner, 6 intermediate) settling in Australia. They were interviewed 4 times during the 10 months as part of
a larger longitudinal study. English use was reported at each interview using a language map and excerpts from recordings of
Interviews 1 and 4 were rated for comprehensibility. Intermediate participants tended to be more comprehensible and maintain a
higher level of English use over time than the beginners. Exploration of individual variation revealed a range of
comprehensibility outcomes, the variable and non-linear nature of English use trajectories, and a possible relationship between
comprehensibility change and English use for some participants. Important methodological implications for future studies relate to
the measurement of comprehensibility and English use, the speech samples used for comprehensibility ratings, and the importance of
individual variation.
Keywords: longitudinal, comprehensibility, English use, individual variation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Measuring English use over time
- 1.2Speech samples used for comprehensibility ratings
- 1.3Comprehensibility and English proficiency
- 1.4The importance of individual variation
- 1.5Study design and research question
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Speech samples
- 2.3Reported English use
- 2.4Raters
- 2.5Rating procedure
- 2.6Interrater reliability
- 3.Results
- 3.1Change in comprehensibility over time
- 3.2Change in English use over time
- 3.3The relationship between change in comprehensibility and English use
- 3.4Contexts of English use
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Comprehensibility ratings
- 4.2Measuring English use
- 4.3The relationship between English proficiency and comprehensibility
- 4.4Speech samples
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (39)
Australian Council of TESOL Associations. (2019). Submission to the evaluation of the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) “new business model”. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cerreta, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2018). Engaging the senses: A sensory-based approach to L2 pronunciation instruction for actors. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 46–72.
Crowther, D. (2020). Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks. What is the effect of speaking task type? Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(1), 96–121.
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16.
(2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490.
(2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7‐year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679.
Dewey, D. P. (2017). Measuring social interaction during study abroad: Quantitative methods and challenges. System, 711, 49–59.
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115–142.
Isaacs, T., & Thomson, R. I. (2013). Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 135–159.
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505.
Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., & Foote, J. A. (2018). Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing, 35(2), 193–216.
Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., Yu, G., & Chereau, B. M. (2015). Examining the linguistic aspects of speech that most efficiently discriminate between upper levels of the revised IELTS pronunciation scale. IELTS Research Report Series, 41. Retrieved from [URL]
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315.
Kennedy, S., Foote, J. A., & Buss, L. K. (2015). Second language speakers at university: Longitudinal development and rater behaviour. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 199–209.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213.
Munro, M. J. (2018). Dimensions of pronunciation. In O. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation. (pp. 413–431). New York: Routledge.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.
(1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182.
(2015). A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century. A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42.
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131.
Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A. (2019). Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 647–672.
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 251, 26–45.
Ranta, L., & Meckelborg, A. (2013). How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 1–33.
Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y. (2017). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43–74.
Saito, K., Dewaele, J. M., & Hanzawa, K. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 60(4), 614–632.
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240.
(2017). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462.
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Lexical profiles of comprehensible second language speech. The role of appropriateness, fluency, variation, sophistication, abstractness, and sense relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 677–701.
The State of Victoria Department of Premier and Cabinet. (2018). Population diversity in Victoria: 2016 census. Local government areas. Retrieved from: [URL]
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344.
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Playsted, Skye & Damon P. Thomas
Levis, John M.
2024. Key issues in L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Thomson, Ron I., Tracey M. Derwing & Murray J. Munro
Zawadzki, Zoë & John Levis
2024. Measuring language use for pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Herrero de Haro, Alfredo & Manuel Delicado Cantero
Nagle, Charles L.
2021. Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
