Article published In: Creoles and Typology
Edited by Parth Bhatt and Tonjes Veenstra
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26:1] 2011
► pp. 111–154
The Gulf of Guinea Creoles
Genetic and typological relations
Published online: 17 February 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag
Especially since Ferraz (1974, 1975, 1979), it has been generally accepted that the four Gulf of Guinea creoles (GGCs) — Santome (ST), Angolar (ANG), Lung’ie (LU), and Fa d’Ambô (FA)2 — are closely related languages based on historical and linguistic data. Ferraz shares his view on the type of genetic relation between these creoles in the following quote:
To take the GG [Gulf of Guinea] case, it would not be plausible to assume that the contact language which developed in the town of São Tomé and the surrounding areas was the same as that which gave rise to Ang[olar], Pr[incipense], and Pag[alu]4. There are enough differences between each of these languages to rule out such a possibility. It would be closer to the truth to say that the four contact languages show many resemblances because, to a large extent, they grew up together, with slaves and settlers introduced through the central administration in São Tomé. (…). Hence different languages developed in the archipelago rather than dialects of one contact language. (Ferraz 1987: 348)
This paper will reassess the linguistic relation between the GGCs and the typological contribution of the African strata. It will be argued that there is substantial linguistic evidence that the GGCs are to a significant extent the result of a common ancestor, which throughout the paper will be labelled the proto-Gulf of Guinea creole (proto-GGC), and that this common ancestor derived most of its features from its Nigerian substrate rather than from western Bantu.
Cited by (31)
Cited by 31 other publications
Ciccarella, Marta, Romain Laurent, Zachary A Szpiech, Etienne Patin, Françoise Dessarps-Freichey, José Utgé, Laure Lémée, Armando Semo, Jorge Rocha, Paul Verdu & Andrey Rzhetsky
Nakano, Raiki & Hisashi Ohtsuki
Agostinho, Ana Lívia
Agostinho, Ana Lívia
Balduino, Amanda Macedo & Manuele Bandeira
Bandeira, Manuele & Gabriel Antunes de Araujo
Bandeira, Manuele, Gabriel Antunes de Araujo & Thomas Finbow
Bartens, Angela & Ilpo Kempas
Sands, Bonny
Agostinho, Ana Lívia & Larry M. Hyman
Agostinho, Ana Lívia & Larry M. Hyman
Almeida, João, Anne-Maria Fehn, Margarida Ferreira, Teresa Machado, Tjerk Hagemeijer, Jorge Rocha & Magdalena Gayà-Vidal
Cardoso, Hugo C.
Jacobs, Bart & Mikael Parkvall
2020. Chavacano (Philippine Creole Spanish). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Jacobs, Bart & Mikael Parkvall
2021. How ‘Portuguese’ are Palenquero and Chabacano really?. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 56:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Agostinho, Ana Lívia, Gabriel Antunes de Araujo & Eduardo Ferreira dos Santos
Bouchard, Marie-Eve
Bouchard, Marie-Eve
Bouchard, Marie-Eve
Hagemeijer, Tjerk & Jorge Rocha
Kihm, Alain
2018. Negation and negative concord in Guinea-Bissau Kriyol (in comparison with Portuguese, substrate-adstrate languages and other Portuguese Creoles). In Negation and Negative Concord [Contact Language Library, 55], ► pp. 225 ff.
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
Parkvall, Mikael & Bart Jacobs
Parkvall, Mikael & Bart Jacobs
Sippola, Eeva
2017. Similarities and differences among Iberian creoles. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 241 ff.
Hagemeijer, Tjerk & Armando Zamora
Hagemeijer, Tjerk
2015. The Gulf of Guinea creoles. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 293 ff.
Hagemeijer, Tjerk
2018. From creoles to Portuguese. In The Portuguese Language Continuum in Africa and Brazil [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 20], ► pp. 169 ff.
Mazzoli, Maria
2015. Complexity in gradience. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 231 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.